On 2018-04-26, Alan Gauld via Tutor wrote:
> OTOH its definitely not good OOP, ther are no methods and we
> are just using the class as a record. (A named tuple might
> actually be a better option on reflection.)
namedtuple is great in lots of cases, but sometimes it transpires
I wish to make alt
On 26/04/18 14:48, Mats Wichmann wrote:
>>> However personally I'd use a class to define your data structure and
>>> just have a top level dictionary holding instances of the class.
>>
>> You are right (again). I haven't thougt of using classes, but that's exactly
>> what they were invented for. T
On 04/25/2018 12:46 PM, Kai Bojens wrote:
> On 25/04/2018 –– 18:35:30PM +0100, Alan Gauld via Tutor wrote:
>>> ...
>>> for line in logfile:
>>> result = pattern.search(line)
>
>> Doesn't this overwrite your data structure?
>> I would strongly advise using another name.
>
> You are of
On 25/04/2018 –– 18:35:30PM +0100, Alan Gauld via Tutor wrote:
> > ...
> > for line in logfile:
> > result = pattern.search(line)
> Doesn't this overwrite your data structure?
> I would strongly advise using another name.
You are of course right. I accidentally shortened this name as
On 25/04/18 14:22, Kai Bojens wrote:
> The structure I'd like to have:
>
> result = {
> 'f...@bar.de': {
> 'Countries': [DE,DK,UK]
> 'IP': ['192.168.1.1','172.10.10.10']
> 'Count': [12]
> }
> }
> ...
> for line in logfile:
>
