Tony Cappellini wrote:
I have a program which currently passes 6 lists as arguments to zip(),
but this could easily change to a larger number of arguments.
Would someone suggest a way to pass a variable number of lists to zip() ?
well, I would have said "apply(zip, (l1, l2, l3, ...))" but apply
Brilliant, thanks Sean.
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:37:14 -0800, Sean Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Liam Clarke wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is a SQL query for the advanced db gurus among you (I'm looking at
> > Kent...)
> >
> > After I've run an insert statement, should I get the new primary ke
Liam Clarke wrote:
Hi,
This is a SQL query for the advanced db gurus among you (I'm looking at Kent...)
After I've run an insert statement, should I get the new primary key
(it's autoincrementing) by using PySQLite's cursor.lastrowid in a
select statement, or is there a more SQLish way to do this
I have a program which currently passes 6 lists as arguments to zip(), but
this could easily change to a larger number of arguments.
Would someone suggest a way to pass a variable number of lists to zip() ?
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
http:
Hi,
This is a SQL query for the advanced db gurus among you (I'm looking at Kent...)
After I've run an insert statement, should I get the new primary key
(it's autoincrementing) by using PySQLite's cursor.lastrowid in a
select statement, or is there a more SQLish way to do this?
In the SQL book
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 02:45 -0500, Brian van den Broek wrote:
> Colin Corr said unto the world upon 2005-03-16 01:38:
> > Greetings Tutors,
> >
> > I am having some difficulties with the concept of functions which can
> > accept an unnamed number of arguments. Specifically, when trying to
> > writ
Kent Johnson wrote:
As Liam suggested, you can walk the dir yourself and modify sys.path.
The walk code could be in a site-customize.py file in site-packages so
it will be run automatically every time Python starts up.
Oops, as Brian correctly pointed out, the correct file name is sitecustomize.p
You can create a .pth file in site-packages. See these links for details:
http://docs.python.org/inst/search-path.html#SECTION00041
http://bob.pythonmac.org/archives/2005/02/06/using-pth-files-for-python-development/
As Liam suggested, you can walk the dir yourself and modify sys.pa
> Is there a convention to be considered for deciding if import
> statements should be included in a function body?
The convention is for all imports to be at the top of a module.
> def specialFunction():
> import foo_special
> doSomethingSpecial()
BUt I copnfess I do o
Marcus Goldfish wrote:
Is there a convention to be considered for deciding if import
statements should be included in a function body? For example, which
of these two module layouts would be preferable:
imports are cached. So once it is imported, it stays imported.
The reason I consider the secon
Marcus Goldfish said unto the world upon 2005-03-21 17:06:
Is there a special startup script the command-line python IDE and/or
IDLE use? As per Liam's response to my previous post, I would like to
use os.walk() to automatically set my sys.path() variable...
Marcus
Is there a special startup script the command-line python IDE and/or
IDLE use? As per Liam's response to my previous post, I would like to
use os.walk() to automatically set my sys.path() variable...
Marcus
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
http:/
No automatic method, afaik, but why not just do an os.walk() in
conjunction with sys.append()?
Regards,
Liam Clarke
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 16:33:20 -0500, Marcus Goldfish
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using Python 2.4/IDLE on WinXP. I organize my sourcefiles in a
> directory tree, similar to
Is there a convention to be considered for deciding if import
statements should be included in a function body? For example, which
of these two module layouts would be preferable:
# --- MyModule1.py -
import foo1, foo2, foo3
import foo_special
# several coherent funct
I am using Python 2.4/IDLE on WinXP. I organize my sourcefiles in a
directory tree, similar to the convention used in Java. When I create
a new subdirectory, though, I have to either (i) manually edit my
PYTHONPATH environment variable, or (ii) do a sys.append() in IDLE for
the new scripts to be
> You can get full control of the output by using sys.stdout.write()
instead of print. Note the
> arguments to write() must be strings:
>
> import sys
> sys.stdout.write(str(1))
> sys.stdout.write(str(2))
> sys.stdout.write(str(3))
> sys.stdout.write('\n')
>
> Or you can accumulate the values into
> Thanks for the thoughts. I noticed that you didn't post directly to
the
> PythonCard users list, so you might not be reading the discussion
Nope, I just replied to a message on Tutor...
> followed. It sounds like MDI applications are deprecated under
Windows,
Under XP thats true, in earlier v
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 11:57:21 +, Matt Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> Thanks for the help with the previous problem - now all solved!
>
> I have a question about accessing lists. I'm trying to do something to
> each item in a list, and then assign it back into the list, ov
hi,
I hav been working on python in developing pyshell... I am using
python readline module to for the command line.. Can u help me with
how to replace or erase the current readline line-buffer.. the
readline module just provides a insert_text func which is appending
the text to the line-buff
On Mar 21, 2005, at 12:57, Matt Williams wrote:
for i in range(len(y)):
y[i]="z"
print y
Surely there must be a better way than this ?
Sounds like a job for... list comprehensions! (cue cheesy superhero
music)
y = ["z" for i in y]
-- Max
maxnoel_fr at yahoo dot fr -- ICQ #85274019
"Look
Dear List,
Thanks for the help with the previous problem - now all solved!
I have a question about accessing lists. I'm trying to do something to
each item in a list, and then assign it back into the list, overwriting
the old value. However, the first loop here doesn't work, whereas the
second lo
Shitiz Bansal wrote:
Now this is so basic, i am feeling sheepish asking
about it.
I am outputting to the terminal, how do i use a print
command without making it jump no newline after
execution, which is the default behaviour in python.
To clarify:
print 1
print 2
print 3
I want output to be
123
22 matches
Mail list logo
