Am 17.03.2010 17:19, schrieb Cédric Krier:
> On 17/03/10 09:15 -0700, Ian Wilson wrote:
>> I don't know much about this, but I thought repeating sending the
>> username and password was frowned upon. Why is this a better approach
>> than the session/login approach?
>
> It is a standard method and
On 17/03/10 11:33 -0500, Gustavo Andrés Angulo wrote:
> Hi, when using HTTP authentication on every request the user and password
> are sent in the HTTP protocol in the section "credentials", I think this
> is wrong way, for to use HTTP authentication protocol I use HTTP + SSL (HTTPS)
> and if I
Hi, when using HTTP authentication on every request the user and password
are sent in the HTTP protocol in the section "credentials", I think this
is wrong way, for to use HTTP authentication protocol I use HTTP + SSL (HTTPS)
and if I want use HTTP the best way is to use a token something like
h
On 17/03/10 09:15 -0700, Ian Wilson wrote:
> I don't know much about this, but I thought repeating sending the
> username and password was frowned upon. Why is this a better approach
> than the session/login approach?
It is a standard method and later we could implement authentication for HTTP
1.
I don't know much about this, but I thought repeating sending the
username and password was frowned upon. Why is this a better approach
than the session/login approach?
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Cédric Krier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I propose to change the authentication mechanism used in XML-RPC
