[Touch-packages] [Bug 2060431] Re: error message during gdebi-core installation

2024-04-26 Thread fprietog
Same problem here, during upgrade from mantic 23.10.1 to noble 24.04: Configurando gdebi-core (0.9.5.7+nmu7) ... /usr/share/gdebi/GDebi/GDebiCli.py:159: SyntaxWarning: invalid escape sequence '\S' c = findall("[[(](\S+)/\S+[])]", msg)[0].lower() In my case gdebi-core isn't the only package wit

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1978738] [NEW] systemd-oomd and zram-config services: "Swap is currently not detected; memory pressure usage will be degraded"

2022-06-14 Thread fprietog
Public bug reported: Problem summary: I've installed the zram-config package. By default it creates a zram swap device with half the physical memory size of the system. For instance, in an 8GB RAM system: # swapon NAME TYPE SIZE USED PRIO /dev/zram0 partition 3,8G

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1978738] Re: systemd-oomd and zram-config services: "Swap is currently not detected; memory pressure usage will be degraded"

2022-06-14 Thread fprietog
As a workaround you can include in the "[Service]" section of the file "/etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/zram-config.service" this line: ExecStartPost=/usr/bin/systemctl restart systemd-oomd.service It causes systemd-oomd.service to be restarted after zram-config.service start. -- Yo

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2042866] [NEW] Warning: Permissions for /etc/netplan/01-use-network-manager.yaml are too open. Netplan configuration should NOT be accessible by others.

2023-11-06 Thread fprietog
Public bug reported: This warning is shown in the system journal (during boot): nov 06 17:15:23 fpgrpi generate[840]: Permissions for /etc/netplan/01-use-network-manager.yaml are too open. Netplan configuration should NOT be accessible by others. The file /etc/netplan/01-use-network-manager.yaml

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2017209] [NEW] systemd-oomd fails with "ConditionControlGroupController=memory was not met"

2023-04-21 Thread fprietog
Public bug reported: PROBLEM SUMMARY: Just upgraded to Ubuntu 23.04 (lunar) from Ubuntu 22.10 (kinetic). systemd-oomd fails with "ConditionControlGroupController=memory was not met" during boot. If you manually started it after boot it starts but after a few minutes it fails wi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2017209] Re: systemd-oomd fails with "ConditionControlGroupController=memory was not met"

2023-04-21 Thread fprietog
I see that memory cgroup is not enabled: # cat /proc/cgroups | grep y #subsys_name hierarchy num_cgroups enabled memory 0 121 0 So a workaround is to enable it adding "cgroup_enable=memory" to "/boot/firmware/cmdline.txt" kernel parameters file for Raspberr

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2017209] Re: systemd-oomd fails with "ConditionControlGroupController=memory was not met"

2023-04-21 Thread fprietog
** Tags added: linux-raspi raspberry-pi -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2017209 Title: systemd-oomd fails with "ConditionControlGroupController=memory was

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2017209] Re: [Raspberry Pi/lunar] systemd-oomd fails with "ConditionControlGroupController=memory was not met"

2023-04-21 Thread fprietog
** Summary changed: - systemd-oomd fails with "ConditionControlGroupController=memory was not met" + [Raspberry Pi/lunar] systemd-oomd fails with "ConditionControlGroupController=memory was not met" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2017209] Re: [Raspberry Pi/lunar] systemd-oomd fails with "ConditionControlGroupController=memory was not met"

2023-05-11 Thread fprietog
There may be a problem with the proposed repo. The .deb files version in lunar-proposed repo is 6.2.0-1005.7 but inside the file http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/dists/lunar- proposed/main/binary-arm64/Packages.gz there is also a non-existent version 6.2.0.1005.8 that causes conflict. Notice t

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2017209] Re: [Raspberry Pi/lunar] systemd-oomd fails with "ConditionControlGroupController=memory was not met"

2023-05-11 Thread fprietog
Just installed and tested the proposed kernel: memory cgroup is enabled by default and problem is solved. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-lunar ** Tags added: verification-done-lunar -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is sub

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2017209] Re: [Raspberry Pi/lunar] systemd-oomd fails with "ConditionControlGroupController=memory was not met"

2023-05-12 Thread fprietog
The file /etc/apt/preferences.d/proposed-updates didn't exists in my system. I've created it with your content and proposed updates now are working. But, AFAIK, I've never needed to pin proposed updates repo to make it work until now (?) -- You received this bug notification because you are a me

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923267] [NEW] indicator-multiload app broken after upgrading libglib2.0-0 2.67.5-2 to 2.68.0-1

2021-04-09 Thread fprietog
Public bug reported: Problem tested in two different environments: - Ubuntu 21.04 Beta amd64 - Ubuntu 21.04 Beta arm64 (Raspberry Pi 4B 8GB) After upgrading these packages: libglib2.0-02.67.5-2 to 2.68.0-1 libglib2.0-bin 2.67.5-2 to 2.68.0-1 libglib2.0-data 2.67.5-2 to 2.68.0-1 The app in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1921696] Re: Failed to start Load/Save RF Kill Switch Status

2021-04-10 Thread fprietog
Same problem here in different architecture: O.S. Ubuntu 21.04 Beta arm64 (Raspberry Pi 4B 8Gb). Fails during boot: # systemctl status systemd-rfkill.service ● systemd-rfkill.service - Load/Save RF Kill Switch Status Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/systemd-rfkill.service; static) Ac

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1445595] Re: Empty trash from Launcher results in Nautilus window opening

2015-08-28 Thread fprietog
Amr Ibrahim (amribrahim1987) wrote on 2015-08-26: Is this related? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1040158 --- It's related but not the same. The report you pointed seems to be quite old and states that nautilus takes focus only whe

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1867537] Re: 10-link-restrictions.conf missing - removed by postinst

2020-05-02 Thread fprietog
Problem persist in Ubuntu 20.04 LTS stable release: root@fpglinux:/var/cache# lsb_release -d Description:Ubuntu 20.04 LTS root@fpglinux:/var/cache# apt policy procps procps: Instalados: 2:3.3.16-1ubuntu2 Candidato: 2:3.3.16-1ubuntu2 Tabla de versión: *** 2:3.3.16-1ubuntu2 500

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1580537] Re: LibreOffice with ambiance theme and breeze icon style is unusable

2016-08-07 Thread fprietog
@Björn Michaelsen; the fixed pic you posted looks very nice. Hope the fix reach the repo soon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-themes in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1580537 Title: LibreOff

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1445595] Re: Empty Trash Results in File Windows Opening

2015-08-17 Thread fprietog
IMHO this is an important bug; well, it doesn't break any important OS feature but it affects the general image of Unity & Ubuntu the users should have because it happens with a usually frequent task execution. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2084376] [NEW] [Ubuntu 24.10 Oracular; systemd-sysctl service] File /etc/sysctl.conf is not processed

2024-10-13 Thread fprietog
Public bug reported: Problem summary: After upgrading from Noble to Oracular the kernel parameters enclosed in the file /etc/sysctl.conf are not being loaded by systemd-sysctl service. The problem is that Oracular systemd package (systemd_256.5-2ubuntu3_amd64.deb) lacks the file

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2084376] Re: [Ubuntu 24.10 Oracular; systemd-sysctl service] File /etc/sysctl.conf is not processed

2024-10-16 Thread fprietog
I'm sorry but I don't understand your answer. I don't see the relevancy of the origin or the contents of the /etc/sysctl.conf file; if that file exists in the system it must be loaded. Otherwise, it's an error. Apart from Ubuntu installers there are lot's of configuration scripts, installers, appl

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2115956] Re: [Plucky] Ubuntu's Remote Desktop Sharing error after upgrading Mesa to "25.0.7-0ubuntu0.25.04.1"

2025-07-07 Thread fprietog
Tested new 25.0.6-0ubuntu0.3 build from ppa:tjaalton/test3. Same problem: gnome-remote-de[2227]: [RDP.CLIPRDR] Client capabilities: long format names gnome-remote-de[2227]: [RDP.RDPGFX] CapsAdvertise: Accepting capability set with version RDPGFX_CAPVERSION_107, Client cap flags: H264 (AVC444): fa

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2115956] Re: [Plucky] Ubuntu's Remote Desktop Sharing error after upgrading Mesa to "25.0.7-0ubuntu0.25.04.1"

2025-07-06 Thread fprietog
1st/ 25.0.4 ppa:tjaalton/test Same error on Remote Desktop Sharing connection: gnome-remote-de[2237]: [RDP.CLIPRDR] Client capabilities: long format names gnome-remote-de[2237]: [RDP.RDPGFX] CapsAdvertise: Accepting capability set with version RDPGFX_CAPVERSION_107, Client cap flags: H264 (AVC44

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2115956] Re: [Plucky] Ubuntu's Remote Desktop Sharing error after upgrading Mesa to "25.0.7-0ubuntu0.25.04.1"

2025-07-06 Thread fprietog
2nd/ 25.0.5 ppa:tjaalton/test2 Same error on Remote Desktop Sharing connection: gnome-remote-de[2228]: [RDP.CLIPRDR] Client capabilities: long format names gnome-remote-de[2228]: [RDP.RDPGFX] CapsAdvertise: Accepting capability set with version RDPGFX_CAPVERSION_107, Client cap flags: H264 (AVC4

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2115956] Re: [Plucky] Ubuntu's Remote Desktop Sharing error after upgrading Mesa to "25.0.7-0ubuntu0.25.04.1"

2025-07-06 Thread fprietog
3rd/ 25.0.6 ppa:tjaalton/test3 Same error on Remote Desktop Sharing connection: gnome-remote-de[2224]: [RDP.CLIPRDR] Client capabilities: long format names gnome-remote-de[2224]: [RDP.RDPGFX] CapsAdvertise: Accepting capability set with version RDPGFX_CAPVERSION_107, Client cap flags: H264 (AVC4

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2115956] Re: [Plucky] Ubuntu's Remote Desktop Sharing error after upgrading Mesa to "25.0.7-0ubuntu0.25.04.1"

2025-07-06 Thread fprietog
I think that probably these messages are not enough to locate the problem. I just copy them from the messages emitted during the failed RDP connection using "journalctl -f", and no mesa direct errors are issued. If you want more info, please, give me the instructions to extract it. Thank you very