[Touch-packages] [Bug 1552939] Re: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #794326 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794326 ** Also affects: openssl via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794326 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Tags added: xenial -- You received this bug notifica

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1552939] Re: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be

** Patch added: "debian-arm64-aarch64_asm.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/openssl/+bug/1552939/+attachment/4587974/+files/debian-arm64-aarch64_asm.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1552939] Re: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be

** Tags added: arm64 patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1552939 Title: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be Status in OpenS

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1552939] Re: arm64 build doesn't use asm and is 4x-16x slower than it could be

Verified the new xenial-proposed openssl and libssl debs, both AES and SHA performance have been significantly improved. We tested the following packages from xenial-proposed on arm64 (aarch64 with fp asimd evtstrm aes pmull sha1 sha2 crc32) and the performance result is as expected: libssl1.0.0_