Thank you for reporting this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better.
Can you explain why this is actually a problem please? Won't timesyncd
suffice on a desktop that uses NetworkManager now? Is the time on your
system actually falling out of sync, or is the problem just the noise of
the error messa
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1042275 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1042275
** Tags removed: needs-upstream-report
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
** Changed in: openvpn (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs
** Description changed:
+ [Workaround]
+
+ ssh -O exit hostname # this will kill all ssh connection to that host
+ ssh-copy-id username@hostname # now it works because it's the first connection
+ # continue using ssh as normal.
+
+ Thanks to Ruben Laguna (ecerulm) in comment 7.
+
+ [Original De
Laurent,
Thank you for your reply.
> I guess that Ubuntu systems with ntp installed would boot a little
faster if ntp was not doing useless work by getting started before the
network is fully up.
That's reasonable, though then this bug should be of low importance I
think, as the impact to users
** Also affects: fedora via
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=103401
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Summary changed:
- cups: 127.0.0.1:631 - Address already in use.
+ rpcbind grabs ports used by other daemons such as cupsd
--
You received this bug notification bec
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
Confirmed - I have followed your reproduction steps and hit the same
issue.
The underlying reason however is not in the python3.4 nor mod-wsgi
packages. The issue is that the Docker "ubuntu:trusty" image seems to
It seems that I can't create a generic Ubuntu task since other Ubuntu
tasks already exist, so I'll leave this with the docker.io package for
now so we don't lose it.
I think we need a Launchpad project for cloud images if we don't already
have one.
** Also affects: docker.io (Ubuntu)
Importanc
** Summary changed:
- Ubuntu Docker images incorrectly include packages from trusty-proposed
+ Ubuntu Docker images include packages deleted from trusty-updates
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3.4 in Ubu
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 01:30:57PM -, Sam Bull wrote:
> I would like to be able to send a notification to the user after a set
> amount of time. Additionally, I would like the user to be able to
> respond to the notification with a couple of buttons (e.g. Yes/No or
> similar).
+1. I had though
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1300367 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1300367
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1300367
rsync 3.1.0 and 3.0.9 incompatibility
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subs
@Christopher
Why did you mark this Incomplete? It does not look Incomplete. As far as
I can tell, all information requested has been provided.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seed
This should have been fixed by:
init-system-helpers (1.22ubuntu7) vivid; urgency=medium
* Declare Breaks/Replaces against both upstart and upstart-bin since
/lib/init/apparmor-profile-load briefly appeared in both packages
(LP: #1439988).
-- Robie Basak Tue, 07 Apr 2015 16:21:23
21:53 pitti: see bug 1458630. We deliberately moved apparmor-
profile-load into init-system-helpers because it isn't necessarily
upstart-specific. So I'm not sure why you say "Temporarily"? In any case
the Breaks/Replaces needs to continue to be present.
** Changed in: init-system-helpers (Ubuntu
The biosdevname mechanism is being proposed to be changed. Please see
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2015-June/038777.html.
Feedback appreciated.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in U
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
Which upstream releases are affected, please? Is it just 2.4.40, and
thus just Wily? Or are 2.4.28 and/or 2.4.31 affected as well?
** Summary changed:
- Requesting ITS#8003 inclusion in 2.4.40 package
+ off-by-on
Marking Importance: Wishlist based on the corresponding Debian bug. If
there are specific issues causing real problems for users, then please
use separate bugs to help us track the actual issues and assess their
importance individually and objectively. "It's buggy" isn't particularly
helpful on its
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
Since it seems likely to me that this is a local configuration problem,
rather than a bug in Ubuntu, I'm marking this bug as Incomplete. I've
tested slapd from trusty-updates and it does appear to install
correctly
I don't really understand the bug task on bind9 packaging here. If you
install the bind9 package, then surely you expect it to listen on IPv6
ports by default? If you don't want this, then presumably you need to
reconfigure bind9?
Setting the bind9 package task Incomplete because as far as I can s
** Also affects: openldap (Ubuntu Utopic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: openldap (Ubuntu Vivid)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openld
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
Since it seems likely to me that this is a local configuration problem,
rather than a bug in Ubuntu, I'm marking this bug as Incomplete.
If indeed this is a local configuration problem, you can find pointers
to ge
** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467281
Title:
rsync ignores -x for dmsetup managed mountpoin
** Also affects: openssh via
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2365
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Description changed:
This is a regression from the version of the client in 14.04 compared to
13.10. I'm connecting to 12.04.4 for a server.
Expected behavio
Public bug reported:
Reliably reproducible on my phone. Steps to reproduce:
1. Make sure orientation lock is turned off.
2. Browse to http://www.ubuntu.com.
3. Rotate screen sideways and wait for the browser to re-orientate.
4. Long press on Ubuntu logo.
Expected behaviour: context menu appears
Public bug reported:
Any attempt to run "ubuntu-bug" seems to fail on my phone (Aquaris 4.5
running r23). This includes running it against "webbrowser-app",
"/usr/bin/webbrowser-app" and "apport". Whichever way it refuses telling
me that "This is not an official Ubuntu package. Please remove any t
09:58 rbasak, how are you logged in ... ?
09:58 ogra_: ssh
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467830
Title:
"ubuntu-bug" does not work on Aquaris 4.5
Status
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
This report should probably be verified upstream and then sent there, as
it doesn't make sense for Ubuntu to diverge from other distributions on
this.
** Tags added: needs-upstream-report
** Changed in: iproute2
** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ryan Harper (raharper)
** Also affects: rsync (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status: New =>
Ah, "apt-cache show" can probably see it because it's installed locally
maybe? I don't see the updates pocket in /var/lib/apt/lists/:
phablet@ubuntu-phablet:/var/lib/apt/lists$ ls
lock
partial
ports.ubuntu.com_ubuntu-ports_dists_vivid_Release
ports.ubuntu.com_ubuntu-ports_dists_vivid_Release.gpg
p
(oh, and sources.list does also have "deb http://ports.ubuntu.com
/ubuntu-ports/ vivid-updates main restricted")
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467830
Title:
Thanks.
> This is likely because the packages come from the ci-train overlay-
ppa.
This seems to be the case for webbrowser-app but not for apport, and
ubuntu-bug still doesn't let me file a bug against apport, in case this
helps you understand this issue better. Is this because
2.17.2-0ubuntu1.1
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
I presume you're using Network Manager to manage the connection to your
phone over Bluetooth? Assuming this is so, I think this needs to be
looked at from the perspective of Network Manager in the first instance.
Thank you for your report. This package failure looks like being caused
by system corruption. Try "sudo apt-get clean" and then try again, in
order to re-download the corrupt file.
Since this looks like local disk corruption or a hardware problem,
rather than a bug in Ubuntu, I'm marking this bug
>From log
dpkg: error processing archive
/var/cache/apt/archives/python-six_1.9.0-3_all.deb (--unpack):
cannot access archive: No such file or directory
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to six in Ubuntu.
https:/
** Tags added: apparmor
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1472639
Title:
apparmor profile
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
I appreciate the existence of crouton, but from an Ubuntu perspective we
have no steps to reproduce on Ubuntu without crouton so I'm marking this
bug as Incomplete for Ubuntu. Please explain what action needs to be
> Does this mean there will be no fix? I and others did NOT change our
configuration. It's that this new update is failing.
It seems more likely to me that some subset of users had some kind of
local configuration problem that would have failed on _any_ update of
openssh (ie. any run of the postin
@Martin
Note that this is bug a regression - previously, before the (I presume)
dh_installinit change, /etc/init.d/foo was a symlink to /lib/init
/upstart-job so a user running /etc/init.d/foo by hand was redirected to
upstart anyway. So while I appreciate that a user might now be getting
desired
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
This sounds reasonable. ssh-copy-id should not be making any assumptions
about the user's default shell on the remote machine. It might be better
for it to call sh explicitly, since sh (compatibility) is more
unive
I have a UX request when setting the timer. In addition to setting the
time remaining until it expires (as you'd expect), I'd like to also
switch to the ability to setting the clock time that I want it to
expire. This would be very similar to setting an alarm of course, but
the alarm setting UI is
> 13:47 Hi guys, anybody from Bug Control here can please switch
bug 1132736 xorg-lts-trusty from Confirmed to Won't Fix? Please see last
comment for rationale. Thanks!
Users may still want to upgrade from an EOL release to a supported
release though. Surely we should encourage this!
I think the
Public bug reported:
As reported in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=878107
The patch, as Ondřej says, clearly shouldn't be able to make anything
worse, appears likely to fix the current mariadb-10.1 dep8 failure on
s390x and ppc64el, and likely may fix other latent bugs on those
> This update also applies other safe-looking options, which are
currently also already applied via sysctls shipped in other packages
SRUs are supposed to be minimal to minimise regression risk. Do you have
an SRU justification for this set of changes, please? Are they related
to this bug, and if
What about server use cases that do not have networkd installed? There
are complex network setups out there, such as HA with
corosync/pacemaker, OpenStack Neutron, and that kind of thing. If this
fix were SRU'd, will all of these things in the wild cope with this
sysctl change?
Can networkd be mad
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 01:22:23AM -, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > Can networkd be made to work without relying on this sysctl tweak? If
>
> No, as the alternative is what isc-dhcp /sbin/dhcp-client does that is
> flush current dhcp lease IP and add a new IP, meaning that networking
> is dro
** Tags added: kernel-autoremove
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1637797
Title:
kernel referred to by /*.old autoremoved
Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
New
** Tags added: kernel-autoremove
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615381
Title:
apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel
Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
I was just looking for kernel-related apt bugs and came across this
report.
It seems likely to me, given that it's had only one affected user in
this time, that this was caused by filesystem corruption or a hardwa
Incidentally I noticed this on an EOL installation in a VM, but I have
no reason to think that anything has changed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1723562
Title
Actually let's let someone else confirm this.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1723562
Title:
Kernels
Public bug reported:
I use unattended-upgrades to install new kernels (I think probably from
the security pocket). I believe this is the default. I also don't run
autoremove automatically, which I believe is also the default.
I just recovered a system that had been stuck in a disk full state for
Public bug reported:
unattended-upgrades 0.93.1ubuntu6
"Description: automatic installation of security upgrades"
This is now wrong for Ubuntu, since the default behaviour of the package
is not restricted to security upgrades.
** Affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undeci
Hi Eric,
Sorry for the delay in getting back to this. As it has been a while I
have reviewed everything again from the beginning.
Can I confirm that by "with expected result" you mean that on
Trusty->Xenial upgrade, in both cases (isc-client-dhcp installed and
isc-client-dhcp-noddns installed) yo
Hello Rodney, or anyone else affected,
Accepted isc-dhcp into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-
dhcp/4.2.4-7ubuntu12.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
ht
Hello Rodney, or anyone else affected,
Accepted isc-dhcp into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-
dhcp/4.3.3-5ubuntu12.7 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
htt
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 07:20:18AM -, Abhijith Gururaj wrote:
> @juliank I have configured the updater to use the main server.
> Downloading updates from the main server shouldn't cause such errors,
> right?
Some ISPs intercept their clients' downloads. The error is telling you
that the downlo
I'm wrong. It is.
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692315
Title:
(except in the development release, I suppose, but that wasn't the
reason I filed this bug)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692315
Title:
Packa
The first I knew of it was an apport/whoopsie GUI popup, which then sent
me to this bug IIRC. I installed this machine fresh from an Artful
daily. The only relevant change I think I made was to add an apt proxy
in /etc/apt.conf.d/. I don't have any other information and didn't save
my traceback, as
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1689495
Title:
unattended-upg
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-17.10
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1697730
Title:
Long boot time due to systemd-networkd-wa
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better.
Since there isn't enough information in your report to differentiate between a
local configuration problem and a bug in Ubuntu, I'm marking this bug as
Incomplete.
If indeed this is a local configuration prob
** Also affects: ntp (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1593907
Title:
ntpdate startup routine prevents
10:29 bdmurray: opinion on bug 1562308 please? It seems to me
that comment 17 is referring to some other bug, with no steps to
reproduce provided. OTOH cosmos-door has a reproducer and confirmed it
broken without and fixed with proposed, so I think this is OK to
release. Do you agree?
6:07 rbasa
The verification of the Stable Release Update for less has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a reg
** Tags added: server-next
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1672941
Title:
FTBFS with older versions of OpenSSL
Status in cyrus-sasl2 package in Ubuntu:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1639776 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1639776
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
We think this is the same issue as tracked in bug 1639776, so I'll mark
this as a duplicate.
** This bug has been marked
Unsubscribing ~ubuntu-sponsors pending a response to Laney's review
comments in https://code.launchpad.net/~flexiondotorg/ubuntu-themes
/ubuntu-themes-gtktoolbutton-lp1641915-xenial/+merge/310889.
Once this is believed to be ready for upload again, please resubscribe
~ubuntu-sponsors.
--
You rec
Mario, thank you for the detailed analysis. This is really helpful.
I wonder though if the right fix would be to have cups-pk-helper run as
lpadmin, rather than root? I'm not familiar with the details though, so
I don't know if that would work or is possible. If the goal in having
lpadmin is to re
> by just making something run as root
Well it's rather than inverse of course.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/934291
Title:
Deleting or stopping print jobs
Unsubscribing ~ubuntu-sponsors for now, as I don't think this is ready
for an upload to Ubuntu without either Till's opinion or an opinion from
Debian or a fix in Debian. Please resubscribe ~ubuntu-sponsors if you
disagree or an upload is otherwise ready to go in.
--
You received this bug notific
00:27 smb: is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1648143/comments/26
correct? Wrong bug?
00:28 yeah, looked odd to me to, I don't see the link between that
security fix and this bug
00:29 Let's reopen for now. If it's wrong, smb can re-close it
perhaps?
** Changed in:
@cue
Please run "sudo apt-get update" and then report the output of "apt-
cache policy cups". I don't know why your apt is seeing
2.1.3-4ubuntu0.2, so I'd like to know what does see.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscrib
@Till
It seems to me that there are three inter-related issues, which I
propose to track in three separate bugs.
(1) The actual maintainer script failure itself (not fixed)
(2) The "regression" introduced by landing 2.1.3-4ubuntu0.2 which was
supposed to fix (1) but didn't. This was resolved by
@ophion
Thank you, this is useful. Based on your results, can you also tell me
what "apt-cache policy libcups2" gives you please?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
(and the command you're using to attempt to downgrade it please)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1676621
Title:
cups : Depends: libcups2 (= 2.1.3-4) but 2.1.3-
@ophion
Please paste the output of "apt-cache policy libcups2" as well as the
output of your attempt to downgrade it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1676621
Ti
** Also affects: logrotate (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: logrotate (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: logrotate (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: logrotate (Ubuntu T
I can no longer reproduce the original problem on current Zesty. I also
tried downgrading to what I think would have been active at the time of
my original report (tor and kernel versions known; I hadn't noted the
apparmor version though). This is as below, but I still cannot
reproduce.
root@test:
14:45 slashd: I'm sure I asked you this before, and you
answered, but I can't find your answer anywhere, sorry. Are you
proposing your debdiff in commit 40 as ready for upload to Trusty? Or is
it still in progress? And do you have a debdiff for the transitional
package in Xenial please? That needs
It looks like 13.10.0+14.04.20170403-0ubuntu1 still needs verifying from
trusty-proposed.
09:41 [SRU] could someone glance at bug 1506427 please? I'm not
sure how it ended up in trusty-proposed. I see no message about it (plus
it doesn't appear to have been verified in trusty, but that's a separa
The verification of the Stable Release Update for dnsmasq has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
IMHO (wearing my ~ubuntu-sru hat), we can and should bundle this with
some other iproute2 update. But users also get frustrated with the
number of updates they receive, so I don't think it's worth doing this
one on its own.
Let's see if any other ~ubuntu-sru comes by and disagrees. Otherwise, I
pr
Rejecting from the Xenial queue due to the lack of response.
If this still needs fixing in Xenial, please see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates and follow
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
T
Thank you for your report.
This looks like a local configuration problem, rather than a bug in
Ubuntu.
You can find pointers to get help for this sort of problem here:
http://www.ubuntu.com/support/community
Since we use this bug tracker to track bugs in Ubuntu, rather than
configuration problem
>From log:
Removing openssh-client (1:6.6p1-2ubuntu2.8) ...
Purging configuration files for openssh-client (1:6.6p1-2ubuntu2.8) ...
rmdir: failed to remove ‘/etc/ssh’: No such file or directory
dpkg: error processing package openssh-client (--purge):
subprocess installed post-removal script retur
** Also affects: krb5 (Ubuntu Zesty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu Zesty)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.la
I sync this yesterday but it's stuck in proposed. Two failing dep8
tests. Both look intermittent so I've retried them.
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is sub
So it looks like this was a regression caused by the fix for bug 1644498
landing in Xenial?
** Tags added: regression-update
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
The verification of the Stable Release Update for appstream has
completed successfully and the package has now been released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gtk+3.0 has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
I see dep8 failures in software-properties 0.96.20.6. But a recent test
against 0.96.20.5 succeeded, which suggests to me that it is a
regression caused by 0.96.20.6. I don't see anything obvious in the diff
that could cause this, but I think it warrants further investigation.
Please could you take
This bug was fixed in the package krb5 - 1.15-2
Sponsored for ChristianEhrhardt (paelzer)
---
krb5 (1.15-2) experimental; urgency=medium
* Upstream patches to fix startup if getaddrinfo() returns a wildcard v6
address, and to fix handling of explicitly specified v4 wildcard
Please reconsider the Importance of this bug, as it makes the phone
unusable for it's basic function (reliably receiving calls).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
> However, we may want to consider changing the default ntp
configuration to use 'server' rather than 'pool' for ntp.ubuntu.com, to
ensure that it is included in the configuration at least once.
Why is this necessary? AIUI, ntp.ubuntu.com exists as a backup in case
pool.ntp.org (an externally mana
Thank you for the test case. Unfortunately Ryan is no longer available
to work on this, so I'll unassign him.
Fixing this is non-trivial. I think any fix has a high risk of
regression, particularly with the permutations of rsync versions that
must interoperate. The full matrix needs to be consider
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 05:00:09AM -, Haw Loeung wrote:
> rsync shipped in Xenial builds with the included zlib (--with-included-
> zlib=yes and -Izlib). Couldn't we SRU a fix doing the same thing as per
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/rsync/+bug/1300367/comments/6?
I am -1 on any SRU that does n
> ** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu Xenial)
>
>Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
No, it's not.
** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification beca
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to resolvconf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1649931
Title:
systemd-networkd needs to ensur
601 - 700 of 1261 matches
Mail list logo
