Hello @Łukasz Zemczak
I understand your concern about breaking existing behaviour.
I would like to clarify 2 things:
1) The change introduced here only ensures that user-requested timeouts are
never exceeded. That means that if something is currently accepting DHCP offers
after the specified t
A [ Regression potential ] section was added to the description.
@Łukasz Zemczak let me know if there are other details you would like.
Thank you!
** Description changed:
-
[Impact]
In some cases, ipconfig can take a longer time than the user-specified
timeouts, causing unexpected delays.
Public bug reported:
See
https://canonical.lightning.force.com/lightning/r/Case/5004K09qFamQAE/view
for more info
** Affects: linux-oracle (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Affects: linux-oracle (Ubuntu Hirsute)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Af
Public bug reported:
CVE-2021-22600
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Linux
Kernel. Affected is the function packet_set_ring of the file
net/packet/af_packet.c. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to
a memory corruption vulnerability. This is going to have a
Public bug reported:
See https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2022-March/128565.html
NOTE: This config is enabled in other gcp kernels and in non-gcp
kernels.
** Affects: linux-gcp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Khaled El Mously (kmously)
Status: New
Public bug reported:
In some cases, ipconfig can take longer than the user-specified
timeouts, causing unexpected delays.
in main.c, in function loop(), the process can go into
process_timeout_event() (or process_receive_event() ) and if it
encounters an error situation, will set an attempt to "t
** Description changed:
In some cases, ipconfig can take longer than the user-specified
timeouts, causing unexpected delays.
in main.c, in function loop(), the process can go into
process_timeout_event() (or process_receive_event() ) and if it
encounters an error situation, will set a
Adding a debdiff of the patch as well. I am not sure if I generated it
correctly though..
** Patch added: "Suggested patch that fixes the problem"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klibc/+bug/1947099/+attachment/5532730/+files/honour-user-requested-timeouts-in-all-cases.patch
--
You
For some background info, this issue is affecting one of the instance
types of a cloud partner. The instance has 18 physical ethernet
interfaces (bonded), but only one of which has a media connection. On
boot-up, ipconfig is called to do DHCP for all 18 devices. 17 of them
fail to send a DHCP reque
Hi @Eric - thanks for the follow-up and sorry for the delayed reply.
> I don't see this piece of code in the klibc upstream project[0]
Are you referring to the piece of code that I am suggesting as a fix? If
so, it makes sense that it doesn't exist elsewhere, which is why I am
suggesting it be in
Hello @Eric.
> What make Bionic more susceptible to this particular problem ? Bionic
kernel version in use ? else ?
I believe klibc/ipconfig itself is susceptible to the problem in Bionic
and Focal and elsewhere. However, Focal (which uses klibc 2.0.7) uses
dhclient for networking initialization
(updated the bug description with further details according to the SRU
template, including reproduction steps)
** Description changed:
** SRU TEMPLATE DRAFT **
[Impact]
+ In some cases, ipconfig can take a longer time than the user-specified
timeouts, causing unexpected delays.
+
+ [Test
Patch proposed upstream:
https://lists.zytor.com/archives/klibc/2021-December/004629.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to klibc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947099
Title:
ipconfig does not ho
5ab296 gve: Use dev_info/err instead of netif_info/err.
613ed2d16246f gve: Add stats for gve.
250d220740d21 gve: Get and set Rx copybreak via ethtool
** Affects: linux-gcp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Khaled El Mously (kmously)
Status: In Progress
** Affects: linux-g
** Also affects: network-manager (Ubuntu Cosmic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Cosmic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: network-manager (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: linux (Ubu
Public bug reported:
Testing failed on:
amd64:
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-bionic/bionic/amd64/s/systemd/20181123_064313_f146e@/log.gz
** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** T
There's a new test in this version of adt, "TEST-22-TMPFILES". It looks
like this test fails because there's a permission problem on the test
script itself "test.sh"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in U
Public bug reported:
Testing failed on:
amd64:
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-disco/disco/amd64/s/systemd/20191009_032712_a8451@/log.gz
** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tag
** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815172
Title:
[bionic] drm/i915: softpin broke
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Cosmic)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to kmod in Ubuntu.
htt
Marking this as invalid for Xenial based on Aaron Ma's comment in
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2018-December/097439.html
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: Won't Fix => Invalid
--
You re
Public bug reported:
Testing failed on:
ppc64el:
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-disco/disco/ppc64el/n/network-manager/20200124_174131_d1990@/log.gz
** Affects: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Thanks Sebastien. This is from Disco actually.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860956
Title:
network-manager 1.16.0-0ubuntu2 ADT test failure with
** Patch added: "proposed-patch-1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+bug/1771783/+attachment/5156893/+files/proposed-patch-1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubu
Proposed fix for lp #1771764 and lp #1771783
** Patch added: "proposed-fix-1771764-1771783.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+bug/1771764/+attachment/5158998/+files/proposed-fix-1771764-1771783.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
Proposed fix for lp #1771764 and lp #1771783
Please ignore the first proposal.
** Patch added: "proposed-fix-1771764-1771783.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+bug/1771783/+attachment/5159000/+files/proposed-fix-1771764-1771783.debdiff
--
You received this bug noti
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves
the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the
results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-
zesty' to 'verification-done-zesty'. If the problem still exists, change
the tag 'verificati
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves
the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the
results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-
xenial' to 'verification-done-xenial'. If the problem still exists,
change the tag 'verifica
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves
the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the
results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-
artful' to 'verification-done-artful'. If the problem still exists,
change the tag 'verifica
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Artful)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubun
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu Artful)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1746463
Title:
apparmor profile load in s
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rtkit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875665
Title:
rtkit-daemon[*]: Failed to make o
** Changed in: linux-azure (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: linux-gcp (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: linux-kvm (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: linux-oracle (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => F
33 matches
Mail list logo
