** Tags removed: ftbfs rls-nn-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Also affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: High
Status: Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattende
Public bug reported:
Like the other Chrome binaries, Keybase also needs a profile:
abi ,
/opt/keybase/Keybase flags=(unconfined) {
allow userns create,
}
Keybase is heavily used for security and boot engineering for cross-vendor
communication and broken without it
** Affects: apparmor (U
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: High
Status: Confirmed
** Also affects: python3-defaults (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are
** Tags removed: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1995790
Title:
regression: ?garbage does not work correctly in install commands
Status in apt
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
S
Proposed fix in:
https://salsa.debian.org/apt-
team/apt/-/merge_requests/327/diffs?commit_id=483e3b5c49762306c0a9f54117fd70cff43af4be
The corner case with kept back packages not due to phasing ends up with
a notice before the prompt:
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Calculati
Noble)
Importance: Critical
Assignee: Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
Status: Fix Committed
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Mantic)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Fixed in apt git.
** Summary changed:
- apt cannot upgrade packages if the current security version is same as updates
+ apt cannot upgrade phased updates if the current security version is same as
updates
** Description changed:
- When I finished installation with Jammy 22.04.3, I noticed tha
Also cherry-picked to the ubuntu/mantic and 2.4.y branches for mantic
and jammy.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051181
Title:
apt cannot upgrade phased update
SRUs uploaded. Setting to Fix committed for internal tooling tracking
needs (I understand normally SRUs should be In Progress, but then the
tool reopens the task...)
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Mantic)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Triaged
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Mantic)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Description changed:
- The awesome apt has a some wonderful tips on their EXAMPLES section
- (printed below). The choice of name to "garbage" might
2.7.11 is in proposed now.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1988819
Title:
When apt keep
This failed to build due to missing update-maintainer, I'm adding this and
uploading it but wondering how it was tested:
dpkg-source: info: using source format '3.0 (quilt)'
dpkg-source: error: Version number suggests Ubuntu changes, but Maintainer:
does not have Ubuntu address
E: Failed to pack
: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
You received this bug notification because you
Public bug reported:
The following failure can sometimes be observed on arm64 in noble, for
example, with gnupg2 and sensible-utils:
360s === FAILURES
===
360s __ T.test_core_dump_packaged
__
** No longer affects: tracker-miners (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054319
Title:
System installed from jammy point release iso cannot upgrad
Public bug reported:
With the new changes I'm uploading, taken from Helmut's patches on
Debian bug tracker, base-files will own the /lib64 symlink, and /lib64
in libc6 will move to /usr/lib64.
Special care has been taken to not break upgrades: You can upgrade the
two in any order.
However, deboo
** Tags added: block-proposed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054719
Title:
base-files, glibc lockstep migration blocking bug
Status in base-files pack
apt and bzip2 have migrated, so we are ready to land them in the next
britney run.
** Tags removed: block-proposed
** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification becaus
gpg-wks-server is not a new dependency so upgrading will of course pull
in a newer version until you remove it. The images will be fixed
eventually when they get rebuilt from scratch.
For upgrades, we can quirk this to avoid upgrading it only for it to
become auto removable later.
** Changed in:
Steve - it is a server package for hosting a web key server, it's
entirely reasonable for it to depend on a mail transport agent. A WKS
server, upon uploading a key, sends confirmation emails to the UIDs in
the key, before publishing it, so that it only published keys with
consent.
It's problemati
Let me move this to debootstrap tasks instead, I guess we should fix the
LTS debootstraps.
** Changed in: debootstrap (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: debootstrap (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
Steve I'm sorry but I cannot reproduce this. I have verified this
countless of times during working on this and I am also unable to verify
this here:
# apt policy debootstrap
debootstrap:
Installed: 1.0.134ubuntu1
Candidate: 1.0.134ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 1.0.134ubuntu1 500
500
I wrote instead but of course it's in addition, I think that's probably
the easier outcome than trying to workaround it in the base-files
preinst. Consulting with helmut
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-fil
I forgot we can't rely on preinst in bootstrap so backporting the
debootstrap change it will have to be.
** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed t
As a workaround, --no-merged-usr probably should work fine in old
releases. It might be easier to add this to the script as a special case
for > noble than backporting new logic we don't need anymore.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
Remind me to add negative Recommends to apt at some point.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054908
Title:
gpg-wks-server pulls in postfix
Status in Auto Packag
** Description changed:
- The last couple of days, I have been unable to run a successful
- debootstrap for Noble Numbat.
+ [Impact]
+ The last couple of days, I have been unable to run a successful debootstrap
for Noble Numbat.
Apparently this is caused by the addition of symlinks (/bin, /l
** Changed in: debootstrap (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054925
Title:
Debootstrap fails for Nobl
** Description changed:
[Impact]
The last couple of days, I have been unable to run a successful debootstrap
for Noble Numbat.
Apparently this is caused by the addition of symlinks (/bin, /lib,
/lib64 and /sbin) in base-files 13ubuntu7. According to debootstrap.log,
it fails to extra
** Changed in: debootstrap (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054925
Title:
Debootstrap fails for Nobl
** Description changed:
[Impact]
The last couple of days, I have been unable to run a successful debootstrap
for Noble Numbat.
Apparently this is caused by the addition of symlinks (/bin, /lib,
/lib64 and /sbin) in base-files 13ubuntu7. According to debootstrap.log,
it fails to extra
Slrry I can make this clearer too by adding a mantic task and marking it
as fix released.
** Also affects: base-files (Ubuntu Mantic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: debootstrap (Ubuntu Mantic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: debootstrap (U
** Changed in: dash (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: dash (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dash in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Public bug reported:
I don't know if this will land before the feature freeze but I'm filing
this in any case:
Our goal for 24.04 is to reject 1024-bit RSA repository signing keys.
Work is ongoing in Launchpad to allow dual-signing PPAs and then resign
all PPAs with a 4096-bit key.
This needs th
** Changed in: gnupg2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054908
Title:
gpg-wks-server pulls in postfix
Status in A
** Changed in: gnupg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Package changed: gnupg (Ubuntu) => gnupg2 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055193
T
I must have forgotten to actually move this into the correct pulse to
fix it, so it's in the 2 weeks starting the week after next now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs
I agree with Nick, regular cleaning *and* cleaning at /boot is best
behavior.
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Wishlist
Status: Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Deferring tracking to the other bugs
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: policykit-1 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
--
You receiv
The regression in debuerreotype is expected due to the included change
from the previous SRU (LP: #1990856), packages are now extracted in a
different order for the test case, hence some time stamps shifted.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded pac
On
root@known-seal:~# apt policy debootstrap
debootstrap:
Installed: 1.0.126+nmu1ubuntu0.7
Candidate: 1.0.126+nmu1ubuntu0.7
Version table:
*** 1.0.126+nmu1ubuntu0.7 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-proposed/main amd64 Packages
500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubu
You probably have /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/20auto-upgrades or another file
later in the search order that overrides the setting, 20auto-upgrades is
what unattended-upgrades configures.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a me
Hi there,
the bug tracker is not the right place for user support. APT does not
suddenly pick different proxies when running as a service. It does
respect your http_proxy and no_proxy variables. Please note that while
http_proxy does not override Acquire::http::proxy, no_proxy does. It
sounds like
There are occasionally permission issues in APT like this, but sadly we
never managed to reproduce them so we never have been able to figure out
where it skips setting the right permission. If you can find a clean
reproducer we can investigate further, but otherwise it's sadly not
actionable.
** P
Apologies, I saw the same issue locally fixed it but must have forgotten
to build a new .dsc:/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054925
Title:
Debootstrap
I mean that's good to know that systemd does not load system-wide
environment variables but it's their design choice and not a bug in apt
(or systemd).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bug
** Tags removed: update-excuse
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nettle in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1885646
Title:
RM ring FTBFS
Status in nettle package in Ubuntu:
Incomplete
Status in ring
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2053228 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053228
Please do not delete files, certainly not ubuntu.sources, or you will no
longer get updates.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscri
While the patch makes the application run it also breaks the
functionality it's patching for deb822 sources by just ignoring them.
More work is needed and I do have it scheduled for this pulse
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
Sorry Łukasz, this has landed in 2.7.13 in proposed back in February,
with the caveat that it is a warning for now. This will essentially
close the bug and we should probably consider the FFe to be switching
that to an error once everything landed. Arguably some consider any of
that work a bug fix
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python-apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047447
Title:
No valid source.list found while upg
The comment one is fixed in noble, I'm not sure what Xavier's
ubuntu.sources is about though, there's probably subtle errors in there
that get lost in the comment. So...
Suffice it to say, this is a rather niche issue as 23.10 did not
actually ship with ubuntu.sources, so it affects a few people w
If it gets stuck maybe look at top to see if it spends CPU anywhere do
do a ps faux or something to see the process tree. I wonder if it's a
debconf frontend socket being stuck or something
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054716
Title:
package polkitd 124-1 failed to install/upgrade: installed polkitd
package
The regressions on mantic have cleared up and the tests of apt have
passed so this is verified there.
Still clearing out a regression from update-manager:i386 on jammy-
** Tags removed: verification-needed-mantic
** Tags added: verification-done-mantic
--
You received this bug notification beca
The regressions on mantic have cleared up and the tests of apt have
passed so this is verified there.
Still clearing out a regression from update-manager:i386 on jammy-
** Tags removed: verification-needed-mantic
** Tags added: verification-done-mantic
--
You received this bug notification beca
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053228
Title:
software-prop
jammy is green too now
** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy
** Tags added: verification-done-jammy
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to a
jammy is green too now
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
Subscribing Canonical desktop team to get their input.
Basically the ask is to ship this file:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/systemd/blob/f39/f/10-map-count.conf
I believe if we do it should be shipped in procps; or possibly, gamemode
should set that option?
** Also affects: procps (Ubuntu
I'm agreeing with desktop in following Fedora to bump to 1048576, the
precedence makes this safe, and this I consider this a bug fix for
crashing software and not a feature request.
** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Con
Uploaded procps with the file; leaving gamemode task open because maybe
dynamic enhancements there still make some sense in 24.10
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
You may have heard about the xz-utils backdoor, compromised binaries
have been removed and replaced with older ones, and a partial amd64
rebuild is ongoing.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch se
Geekley I personally agree and would go a lot further and hide even most
dependencies (you don't really care which libraries you are installing,
just about choices made, e.g. if there's an a | b dependency it should
tell you that it picked a).
So if you want to think about it that terse mode would
Thanks for the bug report, unfortunately this has become quite
convoluted and I've identified at least 3 different strands of
discussion in here that are not related.
Some stuff, like "runuser" in a cron job is clearly never going to work,
but I don't know how the other two instances - sessions wi
Public bug reported:
(This bumps the apt version to 2.8.0. APT uses the odd/even number
system, with 2.7.x being the development series for 2.8, and this is the
only change left for the 2.8 release)
(This will be uploaded after the beta and may be released before noble
release, as a zero day SRU
** Description changed:
(This bumps the apt version to 2.8.0. APT uses the odd/even number
system, with 2.7.x being the development series for 2.8, and this is the
only change left for the 2.8 release)
(This will be uploaded after the beta and may be released before noble
release, as
Sponsored, thanks
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059550
Title:
autopkgtest failures on 1:5.0.
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060581
Title:
stop shipping debian-installer package hook
Status in apport package in Ubun
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060311
Title:
Setting "optional: true" to overcome he time
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.04
** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.04
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
To
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951491
Title:
Can't run snaps: .slice/session-1.scope is not a snap cgroup
Status in X2Go
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2060578 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060578
This was fixed in u-r-u in bug 2060578
** No longer affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subsc
** Tags added: block-proposed block-proposed-noble
** Tags removed: block-proposed-noble
** Description changed:
+ ⚠️ Only land this in the release pocket after PPAs have been resigned
+
(This bumps the apt version to 2.8.0. APT uses the odd/even number
system, with 2.7.x being the developm
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Noble)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in
Please attach a tarball of your /etc/apt/sources.list and
/etc/apt/sources.list.d
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-propertie
Public bug reported:
APT is currently overriden from required to important, this is causing
it not to be installed by default when bootstrapping with mmdebstrap.
** Affects: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Ubuntu Package Archive Administrators (ubuntu-archive)
Stat
The last comment made me realize we are talking about the Qt frontend
here, and yes, sure, we only ever implemented deb822 for the Gtk
frontend and the Dbus backend.
The Qt frontend needs to gain a deb822 entry editor dialog, possibly
some rendering fixes for deb822 source entries, and swap on deb
I'm unsubscribing as I only did a no-change rebuild. I'd generally
advise against using LC_ALL=C in any setting however, it's generally a
bad idea and you should use LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 instead.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is su
Yeah sorry folks this was a bit awkward, to avoid respinning other
images we temporarily spun out software-properties-qt into its own
package (0.99.48.1) and fixed it there, and hence there was no bug
closure or anything. This will fold back into the main package in a
zero-day SRU in 0.99.49.
** A
I don't recommend running with pcscd, it's much more stable to run with
direct access, but I do not know why it doesn't seem to work for you, it
certainly does for me.
It failing with pcscd is nice, it not telling us why and how to fix it
is bad UX though.
** Changed in: gnupg2 (Ubuntu)
St
Hi Gary,
how do you invoke debootstrap so it uses packages from the the updates
pocket? I wasn't able to with --extra-suites=focal-updates, but I might
have missed something.
But then I guess we should actually release that fix too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
My goal would be to switch to deb822 sources for this with the key
embedded in the .sources file.
We're still missing the ability to edit those files graphically however,
that needs to be implemented first.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded pac
There is no specific handling in apt for this, so where are you seeing
this? Is it possible you see this in a graphical update tool like
update-manager?
Your apt-get log looks correct.
What does apt-cache policy snapd say?
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You re
Thanks. I think this is a corner case I did not handle correctly in the
phased updates support.
https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/phased-updates-in-apt-in-21-04/20345
I think if you set
APT::Get::Never-Include-Phased-Updates
In the meantime, this should workaround the issue.
** Changed in: apt (U
What happens here is that that version of snapd is not phased for you,
and it hence pins it down to 1. But you already had it pinned to -1 and
that got overridden, sorry. It should only downgrade pin priority to 1
if it's phased as not for you.
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974456
Ti
Set the verification done tags based on my the confirmation in #11 and
#12 of what I see in my pre-upload testing, and also double checked as
described - with mmdebstrap with proposed enabled, it installed apt
2.0.9 successfully
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
Well you figured out the versions we stopped shipping it, so you could
have just read the changelog to find out why that happened.
But anyway, we no longer protect the last installed kernel.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1978871
Title:
apt package missing apt-auto-removal
Status in a
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Akbarkhon Variskhanov (kbar) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, wh
You also do not have the latest docker installed. Be aware that if the
host system is older than the guest, various things can fail due to
seccomp issues, the latest docker should always be used.
So please check with all updates installed in the host, the official
ubuntu:jammy image, and using a c
Please actually follow the error message and check that the keyring
permissions are correct.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://
This is being fixed in https://salsa.debian.org/apt-
team/apt/-/merge_requests/248
** Package changed: systemd (Ubuntu) => apt (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode
Verified. I hacked around the Packages files locally to simulate the
situation:
0. Pinned snapd to -1 and removed it
1. Modified packages file to add Depends: snapd to an update in proposed
(netplan.io), and set
Phased-Update-Percentage: 0 on snapd
Before:
root@jammy:~# apt policy snapd
snap
For impish, please remove the update, it is not necessary to release an
SRU 3 days before EOL that improves the situation for further SRUs.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
** Tags added: rls-jj-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970449
Title:
GPG keys are not shown in Software and Updates
Status in software
I do not believe there is a bug in apt here. APT literally is too strict
now, it fails to install packages. It will get more relaxed in the
coming weeks.
Anyway, if you find out where those get upgraded, please reopen the bug
and reassign to the correct package.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
For concrete details:
1) Which command would install these updates
2) Please attached `apt policy ...names of affected packages...` output
3) Attach your sources.list and sources.list.d files
4) Attach your preferences and preferences.d files
Maybe just throw all the files into a tarball.
--
Yo
1 - 100 of 2680 matches
Mail list logo
