[Touch-packages] [Bug 1959646] [NEW] dhcrelay does not obey -i interface option

2022-01-31 Thread Jens Elkner
Public bug reported: If one starts dhcrelay with explicitly specifying the interfaces to listen,it silently ignores these options and still listens on all interfaces. This is neither what the man page says (it says, only if no interface is given, it listen on all interfaces), nor what is needed. I

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1917187] Re: lxc cgroup2: containers unbootable

2022-02-02 Thread Jens Elkner
Hmmm, that's an old one. IIRC the real root cause was, that some files possibly included via /usr/share/lxc/config/ubuntu.common.conf still used lxc.cgroup.devices.* instead of lxc.cgroup2.devices.* (the machine was upgraded from bionic to focal). -- You received this bug notification because you

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1917187] [NEW] lxc cgroup2: containers unbootable

2021-02-27 Thread Jens Elkner
Public bug reported: Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS Release:20.04 Codename: focal If one sets in /etc/default/grub (as e.g. desired by facebook oomd): GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="systemd.unified_cgroup_hierarchy=1 swapaccount=1 ..." lxc is not able to start any c

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1917192] [NEW] lxc-stop -r does not work

2021-02-27 Thread Jens Elkner
Public bug reported: Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS Release:20.04 Codename: focal lxc-stop -r -n $zone Stops the container, but does not reboot it anymore, as in bionic. ** Affects: lxc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You re

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1810458] [NEW] do-release-upgrade fails with "No such file or directory: 'gpg'"

2019-01-03 Thread Jens Elkner
Public bug reported: > + do-release-upgrade Checking for a new Ubuntu release Get:1 Upgrade tool signature [819 B] Get:2 Upgrade tool [1,263 kB] Fetched 1,264 kB in 0s (0 B/s)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1811051] [NEW] lxc-templates: too many senseless dependencies

2019-01-08 Thread Jens Elkner
Public bug reported: # apt install lxc-templates Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following additional packages will be installed: busybox-static cloud-image-utils debootstrap dirmngr distro-info genisoimage gnupg gnupg-l10n gn

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1769284] [NEW] ssh client: blowfish-cbc required - missing in bionic

2018-05-04 Thread Jens Elkner
Public bug reported: In bionic openssh client/server ships without blowfish-cbc, arcfour, arcfour128, arcfour256 and cast128-cbc. Unfortunately they are required for backward compatibility, especially for embedded devices, which do not support other ciphers (e.g. Rittal Liquid Cooling Package for

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1769284] Re: ssh client: blowfish-cbc required - missing in bionic

2018-05-04 Thread Jens Elkner
No, this is not an option. Also note, that this breaks a lot of workflows without reason, because Ubuntu ssh client simply stops working with a message like "~/.ssh/config line 3: Bad SSH2 cipher spec '...'": it simply does not know such ciphers (does not ignore them). So especially in environment

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1347020] Re: systemd does not boot in a container

2015-06-07 Thread Jens Elkner
I'm running utopic with latest updates. Any container, which has systemd running simply hangs, when /sbin/init gets started (no matter, whether config has 'lxc.kmsg = 0' or not). Tried it previously with a trusty and today with a vivid container. So wondering, whether there is a bugfix available a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1432683] Re: apt-get install lxc doesn't load required apparmor profiles

2015-06-07 Thread Jens Elkner
It appears, that something is still broken. Because systemd doesn't work, I installed upstart + upstart-sysv (and uninstalled systemd- sysv), but unfortunately sssd doesn't come up (has exactly the same config, as in other < 14.10 zones, where it works as expected). And because sssd doesn't come u

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1692109] [NEW] mount is broken/misbehaving

2017-05-19 Thread Jens Elkner
Public bug reported: "/bin/mount -t zfs -o defaults,atime,dev,exec,rw,suid,nomand,zfsutil rpool/zones/bla /zones/bla" fails, if env var POSIXLY_CORRECT is set, because it calls "/sbin/mount.zfs rpool/zones/bla /zones/bla -o rw,zfsutil", which is obviously a bug. Options should always come first

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1692109] Re: mount is broken/misbehaving

2017-05-19 Thread Jens Elkner
mount from util-linux 2.27.1 (libmount 2.27.0: selinux, assert, debug) Description:Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692109 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1692109] Re: mount is broken/misbehaving

2017-05-19 Thread Jens Elkner
AFAICS the problem is libmount/src/context_mount.c:exec_helper() which is uses operands in a wrong/not posixly incorrect way. See also http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap12.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded pack

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1693900] [NEW] apt-get update should return exit code != 0 on error

2017-05-26 Thread Jens Elkner
Public bug reported: When running 'apt-get update' (e.g. on a container install post-install script), apt-get return with exit code 0, even so it wasn't able to "update" properly. E.g.: + apt-get update Err:1 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial InRelease Temporary failure resolving 'de.a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1693900] Re: apt-get update should return exit code != 0 on error

2017-05-30 Thread Jens Elkner
Hmmm, IMHO 'Err:' and 'W: Failed to fetch' indicate, that it was not able to update properly and thus the result of the operation is unreliable. So its like "your connection is secured, but may be not". I guess most people wouldn't do any financial transaction when reading this ... ;-) -- You rec

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1693900] Re: apt-get update should return exit code != 0 on error

2017-07-17 Thread Jens Elkner
The bug/subject here is, that apt-get doesn't return a proper exit code, not, what else one could use to workaround the bug. Saying, that update from one of all (i.e. 1+) sites is sufficient is like going to fly with a jet, where one of two engines is already broken before it starts. Making this d

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1693900] Re: apt-get update should return exit code != 0 on error

2017-07-17 Thread Jens Elkner
Actually this is the problem: Users think, their system is up-to-date, but it is not for sure because a site failed to respond. Therefore only if _all_ sites answered the request properly, apt-get should return 0. If not, it should return a specified return code, which lets the callee know, that th

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1690891] [NEW] RFE: remove ureadahead from package minimal

2017-05-15 Thread Jens Elkner
Public bug reported: Since on common platforms ureadahead solves nothing but causes a huge amount of garbage/totally useless error messages, which makes it really hard to extract the important messages from e.g. journalctl output, it should be removed from ubuntu-minimal. If there are people, who

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1868892] Re: initramfs-tools/hooks/udev for network *.link really sucks

2020-04-27 Thread Jens Elkner
Ɓukasz Zemczak, yes, upgraded a machine from bionic to focal - same problem. However, the patch looks not optimal but sufficient. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1868892] [NEW] initramfs-tools/hooks/udev for network *.link really sucks

2020-03-24 Thread Jens Elkner
Public bug reported: If one creates e.g. /etc/systemd/network.cu and /etc/systemd/network.fc and symlinks /etc/systemd/network to one of them, network setup will fail on reboot, because /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/udev does a very poor job: it simply checks for a directory instead of the lin

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1424233] [NEW] RFE lxc: lxc should do a better jon of housekeeping containers

2015-02-21 Thread Jens Elkner
Public bug reported: Right now lxc does a pretty poor job wrt. managing containers, i.e. one needs to know, where containers have been installed to be able to access/use/manage them (option -P dir) unless they've been installed in the default location. Even if one knows the install path, it is sti

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1424233] Re: RFE lxc: lxc should do a better jon of housekeeping containers

2015-02-21 Thread Jens Elkner
** Package changed: upstart (Ubuntu) => lxc (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1424233 Title: RFE lxc: lxc should do a better jon of housekeeping containe

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1424253] [NEW] RFE: procps tools should support lxc

2015-02-21 Thread Jens Elkner
Public bug reported: Container management/monitoring is currently a pain, because procps do not support container, i.e. there is no way to tell the tools to "filter" the output wrt. a certain zone or to add a column, which shows the zone name a process belongs to. E.g. for what is needed: {ps|pgr

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1413699] [NEW] pkill|pgrep are buggy

2015-01-22 Thread Jens Elkner
Public bug reported: 'pgrep upstart-udev-bridge' should definitely spit out a pid, but it doesn't. When one uses the option -f than it actually prints the PID of the upstart-udev-bridge process. However using -f is a bad workaround, because than (at least wrt. the man page) the arguments and opera

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1413699] Re: pkill|pgrep are buggy

2015-01-25 Thread Jens Elkner
Please read carefully! This bug is not about upstart-udev-bridge or any other service but about PGREP . 'pgrep upstart-udev-bridge' is just an example, which should work on any Ubuntu, i.e. to reproduce the problem! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch se

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1424253] Re: RFE: procps tools should support lxc

2015-03-10 Thread Jens Elkner
Actually that's not the same at all, because $cgroup != $lxc_name . Your workaround is absolutely user UNfriendly, i.e. still hard to read and for casual users inconvinient, because one needs supply all that many format options ... Anyway, I agree, that these utils should support such things out o

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1424233] Re: RFE lxc: lxc should do a better jon of housekeeping containers

2015-03-10 Thread Jens Elkner
Yepp, and that's IMHO a design flaw. E.g. if one wants to distribute the load on iots storage, it might make sense, to distribute the zones of several storage devices, e.g. zone1 on JBOD1, zone2 on JBOD2, etc As said, the only thing, which lxc nees to track is a single "config directory" which

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1367214] Re: Newly installed openssh-server and upstart: status: Unknown job: ssh

2014-12-26 Thread Jens Elkner
Probably because this piece of junk (upstart) just silently discards any *.conf file with errors/unknown directives in it instead of reporting/logging the problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to upstart in Ubu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1410637] [NEW] gai.conf changes seem to have no effect

2015-01-13 Thread Jens Elkner
Public bug reported: Ubuntu documentation states, that changing /etc/gai.conf is the way to be able to prefer IPv4 over IPv6. So from the original gai.conf we removed the comment in front of the precedence statements AND set the value for :::0:0/96 to 60. Unfortunately this does not seem to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1624415] [NEW] tcsh coredumps all the time on tab

2016-09-16 Thread Jens Elkner
Public bug reported: When a users having tcsh as its [login] shell presses tab key (autocompletion), tcsh coredumps immediately, always: admin.python ~ > gdb tcsh GNU gdb (Ubuntu 7.11.90.20160906-0ubuntu1) 7.11.90.20160906-git ... (gdb) run Starting program: /local/home/admin/tcsh admin.python ~

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1347020] Re: systemd does not boot in a container

2015-11-22 Thread Jens Elkner
Today I upgraded our last utopic containers (~10) to vivid using do- release-upgrade: Everywhere the same: after reboot systemd is the only thing which is running in the container, but nothing else happens. It doesn't start anything! So the only way to get the stuff fixed is to manually attach to t

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1394249] [NEW] lxc package dependencies over-constrained

2014-11-19 Thread Jens Elkner
Public bug reported: Obviously lxc does NOT depend on dnsmasq-base and thus this dependency should be lowered to "optional" or "recommended". Today entities using containers already have proper DNS as well as DHCP servers and thus do not need at all another point of failure/possible weak software

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1394263] [NEW] lxc: unconditional overwrite of USE_LXC_BRIDGE

2014-11-19 Thread Jens Elkner
Public bug reported: Defining USE_LXC_BRIDGE and than overwriting it unconditionally in the source /etc/default/lxc-net doesn't make sense/is confusing. ** Affects: lxc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1394352] [NEW] apparmor: Multiple definitions ... bailing out

2014-11-19 Thread Jens Elkner
Public bug reported: When one creates a incorrect profile, apparmor_parser seems to leave an artifact of the "problem" file in the same directory, which in turn leads to another error, when the file gets fixed. Not sure, how appamor stuff works, but this is simply an unacceptable behavior! It shou

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1394263] Re: lxc: unconditional overwrite of USE_LXC_BRIDGE

2014-11-20 Thread Jens Elkner
Well, it is strange: If there is such a setting in /etc/default/lxc, one usually assumes, that this is the master of the disaster and gets "propagated" downwards, but obviously it is not ... And thus I wonder, which files in the lxc forest need to be checked as well to avoid further surprises ...