LGTM, uploading.
** Changed in: sudo (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: sudo (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sudo in Ubuntu.
https://bugs
Public bug reported:
While debugging a FTBFS in Ubiquity, I observed that the usage of
debconf-copydb regressed when using version 1.5.85 of debconf. The
previous-in-ubuntu version 1.5.82 of debconf was OK.
That invocation looks roughly like:
debconf-copydb templatedb pipe --config=Name:pipe --c
** Changed in: debconf (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Invalid
** Changed in: debconf (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You receive
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1063817
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063817
** Also affects: debconf (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063817
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification beca
With the updated context, I think the proposal looks reasonable and
would be comfortable sponsoring the upload. I suggest first waiting for
the lvm2 merge to migrate, just to rule out issues on that front.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded pack
Public bug reported:
As part of time_t work, -Werror=implicit-function-declaration is being
set, but that causes the following FTBFS:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/716768885/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-
armhf.pam_1.5.3-5ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz
In file included from obscure.c:42:
obscure.c: In functio
** Description changed:
As part of time_t work, -Werror=implicit-function-declaration is being
- set, but that causes the following FTBFS:
+ set on armhf, but that causes the following FTBFS on any arch with the
+ same -Werror=implicit-function-declaration setting:
https://launchpadlibraria
** Also affects: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057996
Title:
ubuntu-24.04 version: c
** Changed in: subiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057996
Title:
ubuntu-24.04 version: cmd-curthooks/
Per https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2024/04/20/%23ubuntu-release.html#t18:58
the required kernel is -31, which is currently in proposed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064350
Title:
pam_userdb.so is missing
Status in pam package
** Also affects: pam (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064350
Title:
pam_userdb.so is missing
Status
Public bug reported:
Imported from Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/1065064:
Package: libpam-doc
Version: 1.5.3-4
Severity: normal
An upgrade reported:
Error in `/usr/share/doc-base/libpam-doc.pam-admin-guide', line 14: all
`Format' sections are invalid.
Error in `/usr/share/doc-base/libp
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1065088
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065088
** Also affects: pam (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065088
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
hanged in: pam (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu Noble)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam i
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu Noble)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bunge
** Description changed:
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ * In the process of bootstrapping pam for time_t, libdb-dev was
+deliberately removed in salsa commit 65621d8 to allow libdb-dev to
+undergo time_t transition.
+ * The result of that is no pam_userdb.so in libpam-modules
+ * The fix takes the fo
** Attachment added:
"1.5.2-9.1ubuntu3_to_1.5.3-5ubuntu5_libpam-doc.debdiff.notapatch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/2064360/+attachment/5773776/+files/1.5.2-9.1ubuntu3_to_1.5.3-5ubuntu5_libpam-doc.debdiff.notapatch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Description changed:
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ * In the pam 1.5.3-1 merge, documents formerly found in libpam-doc
+were omitted. Just a few documents remain in a package that
+formerly had many in /usr/share/doc/libpam-doc/{html,txt}.
+ * A debdiff of the dropped files can be found in attach
** Patch added: "1.5.2-9.1ubuntu3_to_1.5.3-5ubuntu5_libpam-doc.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/2064360/+attachment/5773775/+files/1.5.2-9.1ubuntu3_to_1.5.3-5ubuntu5_libpam-doc.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch se
@Nathan Teodosio (nteodosio)
> speech-dispatcher
> +export DEB_BUILD_OS_RELEASE_ID=$(dpkg-buildflags --get
> DEB_BUILD_OS_RELEASE_ID)
This part looks incorrect. Running that command returns an empty string, when
I believe the expected value is "ubuntu". I ended up dealing with this
problem
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mschiu77/ubuntu/+source/alsa-utils/+git/alsa-utils/+merge/469921
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mschiu77/ubuntu/+source/alsa-utils/+git/alsa-utils/+merge/469920
--
You received this bug notification because you
> The Oracular is expected to sync with v1.2.12 and we may not have to
backport to Oracular.
What happens if the merge of alsa-utils doesn't occur? Right now we are
in a state where a merge is required, so this isn't going to autosync,
and if the merge doesn't happen in Oracular then users will
So if you look at https://merges.ubuntu.com/main.html?query=alsa-
utils&showProposed=true&showMergeNeeded=true&showLongBinaries=true you
can see the state of this - Ubuntu has a delta on the alsa-utils
package, the Ubuntu version is 1.2.11-1ubuntu1 and the Debian version is
1.2.12-1.
Someone would
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Change
I have self-verified the change and it passes my listed test plan.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981385
Title:
initrd lacks modules to mount boot
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
Sponsored, thanks Dave!
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert)
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
** C
** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert)
** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
I have sponsored this upload.
** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sysvinit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2002789
Title:
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~tsimonq2/casper/+git/casper/+merge/436490
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2004092
Title:
casper fai
Tagged incoming as while there is a modified casper uploaded, the
matching merge proposal was disapproved
(https://code.launchpad.net/~tsimonq2/casper/+git/casper/+merge/436490),
so the next casper upload will regress the current version of the fix.
A longer term solution is needed.
** Tags added:
>> the next casper upload will regress the current version of the fix
> What is the rationale for reverting this change?
As of yet I think that has't happened. Right now we have 2 caspers
* git casper at https://git.launchpad.net/casper, version 1.478, without this
proposed fix since the MP was
** Also affects: subiquity (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Summary changed:
- Ubuntu 23.04 Canary subiquity crashed install failed
+ subiquity subcommand crash on apt hash mismatch
** Changed in: subiquity (Ub
Looking at the desktop ISOs, while the system is configured with Netplan
to use NetworkManager, there seems to be some conflict here where
systemd-networkd is trying to interact with the device. Some feedback
would be appreciated. The practical result is that early boot cloud-
init is not able to
** Tags added: rls-ll-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2008952
Title:
DNS failure while trying to fetch user-data
Status in cloud-init:
Triaged
S
So while this bug talks about netboot, I think it isn't necessary to
involve that for testing purposes. I suggest simply booting the desktop
daily-live with the nocloud kernel command line listed above and seeing
how things go. Are the various network tools doing what we expect?
Note that gnome-
> So I wonder what is the exact sequence of events for running the
Netplan generator (by systemd), installing the 50-cloud-init.yaml file
(by cloud-init), installing the 01-network-manager-all.yaml file (by the
installer?), executing `netplan apply` (by cloud-init).
By the time Subiquity has start
I played with a two variation of dropping in some after directives, but
obtained similar failing results where the network state was not what
cloud-init wanted at the time it started.
@Chad - what's your thoughts on some service reordering?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Curtin (no "a") doesn't manage time settings, so the fix definitely
isn't going there.
Comment #4 though makes this sound like it needs to be in the image, and
isn't installer specific? Or can you clarify what you'd like the
installer to do here?
** Changed in: curtain (Ubuntu)
Status: Ne
** Changed in: curtin (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gsettings-desktop-schemas
in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956102
Title:
Time for the US is shown in 24
Curtin is not the appropriate place to land fixes or even quirk
workarounds for this problem. I would appreciate if you avoided adding
uninvolved components to the bug, especially when it has already been
pointed out that this is the wrong spot.
The linked threads you mention do not appear to me
Partial review of the patch so far. I haven't read much openbox code so
take this with a grain of salt.
https://bugzilla.icculus.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6669#c9 mentions a concern
that itPrev may still be pointing to invalid data. I share this
concern. I think some interesting testcases are what ha
Thanks for the patch, Aaron. I'm able to reproduce this bug using the
firefox f11 -> open link in new window, when using the live session of
the daily-live lubuntu iso. And the attached patch does seem to help.
Overall the patch is what I was hoping to see, but I will request some
changes.
* The
Thanks, uploaded!
** Changed in: openbox (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2011751
Title:
openbox crashed
What a mess!
I have uploaded the livecd-rootfs change proposed by Chad in #26. Note
that there is another problem around jsonschema exposed by this that is
in progress.
** Also affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
** Description changed:
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ * On Ubuntu Mate with the Lunar series, when running
+ubuntu-release-upgrader, the displayed font of running
+applications (including the upgrader) becomes very corrupted.
+
+ * This is not just a display problem, it is also a functional one.
+
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
* On Ubuntu Mate with the Lunar series, when running
ubuntu-release-upgrader, the displayed font of running
applications (including the upgrader) becomes very corrupted.
* This is not just a display problem, it is also a functional one.
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
- * On Ubuntu Mate with the Lunar series, when running
-ubuntu-release-upgrader, the displayed font of running
-applications (including the upgrader) becomes very corrupted.
+ * On Ubuntu Mate with the Lunar series, when running
+ ubuntu-release
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
* On Ubuntu Mate with the Lunar series, when running
ubuntu-release-upgrader, the displayed font of running
applications (including the upgrader) becomes very corrupted.
* This is not just a display problem, it is also a functional one.
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
* On Ubuntu Mate with the Lunar series, when running
ubuntu-release-upgrader, the displayed font of running
applications (including the upgrader) becomes very corrupted.
* This is not just a display problem, it is also a functional one.
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
* On Ubuntu Mate with the Lunar series, when running
ubuntu-release-upgrader, the displayed font of running
applications (including the upgrader) becomes very corrupted.
* This is not just a display problem, it is also a functional one.
** Also affects: modemmanager (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: modemmanager (Ubuntu Mantic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed t
.
Uploading for noble.
** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu Noble)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert)
** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You rece
I'm unsubscribing sponsors for the moment, when you are content with the
results on noble please provide a modified debdiff with a SRU-friendly
version number for mantic and subscribe sponsors again. Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded pa
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https
Uploaded
** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert)
** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to b
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1097467 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097467
Merging with LP: #1097467, as documentation fixes are happening there to
reflect long-standing upstream desired behavior.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1097467
bash does not fulfill --rc
Public bug reported:
p11-kit will FTBFS if bash-completion happens to be installed on the
system building p11-kit.
The failure is raised by dh_missing:
dh_missing
dh_missing: warning: usr/share/bash-completion/completions/p11-kit exists in
debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere (related
** Changed in: p11-kit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to p11-kit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046389
Title:
FTBFS if b
** Changed in: p11-kit (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to p11-kit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046389
Title:
FTBFS if bash-completion is installed at
Public bug reported:
When analyzing the kernel modules present in the current initrd, I have
found that there are hundreds of such differences, and that this started
with the move to dracut.
I believe that the move to dracut was intended to be relatively module
neutral - see LP: #2031841 and LP:
** Attachment added: "0.142ubuntu11.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/2049540/+attachment/5740004/+files/0.142ubuntu11.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools i
** Attachment added: "0.142ubuntu19.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/2049540/+attachment/5740005/+files/0.142ubuntu19.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools i
** Attachment added: "0.142ubuntu10.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/2049540/+attachment/5740003/+files/0.142ubuntu10.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools i
** Tags added: rls-nn-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049540
Title:
hundreds of differences in module list between initramfs-tools version
Hi Ben,
> Is there any proof that these modules are needed?
It appears we have very different assumptions for how dracut was to be
brought on board.
Diffstat of 0.142ubuntu1[01].log looks like:
1 file changed, 229 insertions(+), 661 deletions(-)
That sounds like a lot of changes, in a LTS. I
This appears to also be affecting the systemd packages on hirsute at the
moment.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libsystemd-dev : Depends: libsystemd0 (= 247.3-3ubuntu3.1) but 247.3-3ubuntu3
is to be installed
Attempting to force an install at version ubuntu3.1 offers to remove
I attempted to verify.
Verification summary - inconclusive
Steps performed
1. Create container - lxc launch images:ubuntu/hirsute
2. do steps 1 & 2 in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification
$ dpkg -l apt
[...]
ii apt2.2.3amd64commandline package ma
** Tags added: rls-kk-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to busybox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937110
Title:
dhcp option 121 & 249
Status in subiquity:
New
Status in busybox package in
Changing states - the change was committed on snapd, not squashfs-tools.
** Changed in: snapd
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: squashfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded pack
Buildlog with different results from my PPA build
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/559561150/buildlog_ubuntu-impish-amd64.glibc_2.34-0ubuntu3~ppa1_BUILDING.txt.gz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to grep in Ubuntu.
h
Naively dropping this commit into the glibc package yields a dozen test
failures.
FAIL: conform/POSIX2008/regex.h/conform
FAIL: conform/POSIX/regex.h/conform
Public bug reported:
Systemd amd64 autopkgtest runs, when triggered by non-linux-meta
packages, usually pass. You can find some failures on a possible flaky
TEST-29-PORTABLE. Ignore those for the moment.
Systemd amd64 autopkgtest runs, triggered by linux-meta packages, usually fail
and hit the
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1944712 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1944712
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1944712
systemd/237-3ubuntu10.52 ADT test failure with
linux-aws-5.4/5.4.0-1057.60~18.04.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
I filed one like this as well, so let me merge with this one.
My notes:
Systemd amd64 autopkgtest runs, when triggered by non-linux-meta
packages, usually pass. You can find some failures on a possible flaky
TEST-29-PORTABLE. Ignore those for the moment.
Systemd amd64 autopkgtest runs, triggered
** Tags added: update-excuse
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1944712
Title:
systemd/237-3ubuntu10.52 ADT test failure with linux-
aws-5.4/5.4.0-1057.60~18
Snapd team advises that this will be fixed in 2.52.1, and that affected
users should pick up that version when available or, in the mean time,
pickup a newer snapd. Currently the beta channel has this 2.52.1
version, which does appear to resolve the issue. Based on this advise
I'm removing 'rls-i
Hi @helioloureiro,
While for your use case I can easily see the need for this patch, I'm
not sure this should be applied generally. In a VPN split tunnel
scenario, the very case that Pulsesecure seems to be rejecting, the
original config would probably be more appropriate.
Another path forward -
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Mantic)
Assignee: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) => Dan Bungert (dbungert)
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Mantic)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded pa
Uploaded for Mantic, thanks!
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Mantic)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019856
** Changed in: subiquity
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2008952
Title:
DNS failure while trying to fetch user-data
Status in
** Changed in: powermgmt-base (Ubuntu Kinetic)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to powermgmt-base in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980991
Title:
/usr/sbin/on_ac_pow
@mmariorrossi, please retest with the version 249.11-0ubuntu3.6 in
updates.
apt -o APT::Get::Always-Include-Phased-Updates=true upgrade
Also note this comment from earlier:
In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates
please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and t
@enr0n - this is fix released for Jammy, does the base bug still need to
be open?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1988994
Title:
TEST-58-REPART autopkgtest
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-22.04.2
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug no
Thanks for the report.
> do you think this bug will be corrected soon ? or i change parent
directory name of mountpoints ?
Probably better off changing the parent directory name, I'm afraid.
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
Importa
Thanks Robert. A few questions
1) Is the Kinetic target correct?
2) Can you elaborate more on the desired work? I'm not entirely sure what
changes are desired from this description.
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug no
This error is in the logs:
/usr/sbin/mkinitramfs: 97: .: Can't open /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf
That's a bit unusual I think.
Did that file go missing somehow? Or corrupt maybe?
If you just need to restore it this command should help:
sudo apt install --reinstall -o Dpkg::Options::="--fo
Brian, this bug is linking to itself - did you have another one in mind?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990552
Title:
update apport's package installation
** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990588
Title:
package sys
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
** Tags added: foundations-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libcap2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1700814
Title:
Default capability of cap_setfcap+i should be set on setcap
Status
** Changed in: libcap2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libcap2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899103
Title:
libpam-cap causes PAM applications to cras
** Tags added: foundations-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971901
Title:
dlltool uses non-unique temp filenames
Status in binutils:
Fix
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Triaged
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Description changed:
+ Steps to reproduce:
+
+ apt-get install lxd-installer
+ lxd init
+ lxc launch ubuntu:jammy ct0
+ lxc exec ct0 -- bash
+
+ Then
Yes, this appears to be deliberate upstream behavior and I'm not sure we
should revert that. Marking incomplete, if there is further info please
share.
** Tags removed: foundations-triage-discuss
** Changed in: libcap2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notifica
Hi There, looks like this old bug is seeing some new traffic.
For more recent users, please file a new bug with reproduction steps.
Marking as incomplete, if this is still relevant please update the bug. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seede
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
