[Touch-packages] [Bug 1727401] Re: Corruption on windowed 3D apps running on dGPU (Intel/AMD)

2018-01-03 Thread Yuan-Chen Cheng
** Changed in: oem-priority Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1727401 Title: Corruption on windowed 3D apps running on dGPU (I

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1741155] [NEW] package apport 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.15 failed to install/upgrade: サブプロセス インストール済みの post-installation スクリプト はエラー終了ステータス 239 を返しました

2018-01-03 Thread nobuakiy
Public bug reported: This message appeared just after booting up. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: apport 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.15 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-42.46~16.04.1-generic 4.10.17 Uname: Linux 4.10.0-42-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia_drm

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1741045] Re: Change the default resample-method to speex-float-10 in daemon.conf

2018-01-03 Thread Daniel van Vugt
It appears the default of speex-float-1 is chosen by upstream (?... although commented out): https://cgit.freedesktop.org/pulseaudio/pulseaudio/tree/src/daemon/daemon.conf.in More information: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/artful/en/man5/pulse-daemon.conf.5.html I'm not familiar with these

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1741164] Re: package apport 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.13 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 1

2018-01-03 Thread Apport retracing service
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1741164 Title: package apport 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.13 failed to install/upgrade: subproces

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1741164] [NEW] package apport 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.13 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 1

2018-01-03 Thread Daniel Chapman
Public bug reported: Happened on startup, after password, loading desktop. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: apport 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.13 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-42.46~16.04.1-generic 4.10.17 Uname: Linux 4.10.0-42-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm n

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1730083] Re: package libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0 1.10.4-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: tentative de remplacement de « /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgstbasecamerabinsrc-1.0.

2018-01-03 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for gst-plugins-bad1.0 (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: gst-plugins-bad1.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gst-plu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1741172] [NEW] package apport 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.15 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2018-01-03 Thread Deepak
Public bug reported: please solve problem ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: apport 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.15 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-104.127-generic 4.4.98 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-104-generic x86_64 ApportLog: ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.15 Architecture: amd64 CrashRep

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1741172] Re: package apport 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.15 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2018-01-03 Thread Apport retracing service
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1741172 Title: package apport 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.15 failed to install/upgrade: subproces

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1741176] [NEW] ssh-keyscan returns no key on some hosts

2018-01-03 Thread latimerio
Public bug reported: after upgrading our control server to Ubunto 16.04 LTS I do not get a key response from ssh-keyscan from some legacy hosts while others with the same OpenSSH revision work ok. Here is a sample output where you can see that in the first query that there is just the SSH versi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1741176] Re: ssh-keyscan returns no key on some hosts

2018-01-03 Thread latimerio
Attached is an output of ssh-keyscan -vv to give more details ** Attachment added: "ssh.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1741176/+attachment/5030888/+files/ssh.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, whi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1741176] Re: ssh-keyscan returns no key on some hosts

2018-01-03 Thread latimerio
SOLVED: I found that for some reason I needed to extend the default timeout to get the proper response ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in U

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1726497] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in wl_abort()

2018-01-03 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: wayland (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to wayland in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.n

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1726497] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in wl_abort()

2018-01-03 Thread Daniel van Vugt
This issue is also being tracked in: https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/c459edaa2be8280fd77029eaf8d7b26faa8083e9 ** Description changed: + https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/c459edaa2be8280fd77029eaf8d7b26faa8083e9 + + --- + This crash occurred when I was browsing my folders. ProblemType:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1726497] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in wl_abort()

2018-01-03 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to wayland in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1726497] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in wl_abort()

2018-01-03 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to wayland in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.n

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1308200] Re: apt-get not RFC6555 (Happy Eyeballs) compliant

2018-01-03 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: apt (Debian) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308200 Title: apt-get not RFC6555 (Happy Eyeballs) compliant St

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1740895] Re: intel graphics drivers are not installed properly

2018-01-03 Thread Timo Aaltonen
OpenGL vendor string: Intel Open Source Technology Center OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI Intel(R) HD Graphics 620 (Kabylake GT2) OpenGL version string: 3.0 Mesa 17.0.7 looks normal to me ** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification becau

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1741189] [NEW] New bugfix release 17.2.8

2018-01-03 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Public bug reported: [Impact] [Test case] [Regression potential] ** Affects: mesa (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: mesa (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: mesa (Ubuntu Artful) Importance: Undecided St

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1741189] Re: New bugfix release 17.2.8

2018-01-03 Thread Timo Aaltonen
** Description changed: [Impact] + + A new upstream bugfix release is available. Release note diff compared + to 17.2.4: + + Mesa 17.2.5 is now available. + + In this release we have: + + In Mesa Core a GL error related to the ARB_ES3_1_compatibility spec + noticed with the GFXBench 5 Aztec

<    1   2