This bug was fixed in the package iproute2 - 3.12.0-2ubuntu1.1
---
iproute2 (3.12.0-2ubuntu1.1) trusty; urgency=medium
* debian/patches/99-increase-receive-buffer-size.patch: Fix "Message
truncated" issue with many VF's. Thanks to Phil Sutter
. Closes LP: #1720126.
-- Mo
I don't think the Trusty armhf autopkgtest test is likely to be a
regression. It doesn't appear to have ever passed before and the error
looks associated with the test runner rather than iproute2 itself. Given
the nature of the patch, it seems unlikely to me to be caused by this
update. I think it'
** Changed in: iproute2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: iproute2 (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: iproute2 (Ubuntu Zesty)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Bug watch removed: Red Hat Bugzilla #1086512
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_b
I can confirm it now works with 112 VF. This is the most my hardware
will support.
Thanks,
Alan
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1720126
Title:
[ip link]
** Changed in: iproute2 (CentOS)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1720126
Title:
[ip link] Message truncated err
I'm guessing this might be a quirk of the armhf runners:
test_tree_garbage (__main__.ChrootRunner)
copied source tree contains only expected files ... : Operation not permitted
cp: cannot create special file ‘/tmp/tmp36ee0r77/chroot//dev/null’:
Operation not permitted
cp: cannot create special fil
The trusty upload seems to have an armhf autopkgtest regression - looks
really strange and I see it failed once already. I think it might be
good to run the autopkgtest suite with no triggers to see if it's an
unrelated regression or not. Could anyone take a look at that?
http://autopkgtest.ubuntu
If someone is interested in the proper upstream fixes, please file a new
bug and we will need to fix bionic and prepare a distinct SRU for the
existing releases.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubun
A real fix for this issue has been accepted upstream and was applied to
net-next branch:
commit 2d34851cd341f0e1b3fc17ca3e6e874229f3a1f8
Author: Hangbin Liu
Date: Thu Oct 26 09:41:46 2017 +0800
lib/libnetlink: re malloc buff if size is not enough
commit 86bf43c7c2fdc33d7c021b4a1add1c8facb
This bug was fixed in the package iproute2 - 4.3.0-1ubuntu3.16.04.2
---
iproute2 (4.3.0-1ubuntu3.16.04.2) xenial; urgency=medium
* debian/patches/99-increase-receive-buffer-size.patch: Fix "Message
truncated" issue with many VF's. Thanks to Phil Sutter
. Closes LP: #172012
The verification of the Stable Release Update for iproute2 has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Jan Gutter <1720...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> @arges
>
> Hi, would you need any more testing from us?
Nope, your part is done. All SRUs have to bake for 7 days in -proposed
to shake out regressions.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
@arges
Hi, would you need any more testing from us?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1720126
Title:
[ip link] Message truncated error for large number of p
Launchpad has imported 8 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380803.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://hel
** Tags removed: verification-done-trusty verification-needed-xenial
** Tags added: verification-done-xenial verification-needed-trusty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
I tested the iproute2_4.3.0-1ubuntu3.16.04.2_amd64.deb (xenial) package
and this fixed the bug for me.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-trusty
** Tags added: verification-done-trusty
** Tags added: verification-needed-trusty verification-needed-xenial
--
You received this bug notification b
** Tags removed: verification-needed-trusty
** Tags added: verification-done-trusty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1720126
Title:
[ip link] Message trunca
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags removed: verification-needed-trusty verification-needed-xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
I tested on Trusty: iproute2_3.12.0-2ubuntu1.1_amd64.deb fixed the bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1720126
Title:
[ip link] Message truncated error fo
Hello Pieter, or anyone else affected,
Accepted iproute2 into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/3.12.0-2ubuntu1.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
http
Hello Pieter, or anyone else affected,
Accepted iproute2 into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/4.3.0-1ubuntu3.16.04.2 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
On 20.10.2017 [08:24:37 -0700], Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> On 20.10.2017 [07:18:15 -], Jan Gutter wrote:
> > I had a look at the two proposals and could not spot any obvious
> > mistakes:
> >
> > - the correct upstream git commit has been cherry-picked
> > - I don't have any objections to attrib
On 20.10.2017 [07:09:00 -], Jan Gutter wrote:
> I concur with option 2), unnecessary deviation will just cause
> confusion.
Thank you for confirming that!
> Regarding the other buffer sizes, the last time I looked they were
> mostly OK. The issue reared its head in this particular case becaus
On 20.10.2017 [07:18:15 -], Jan Gutter wrote:
> I had a look at the two proposals and could not spot any obvious
> mistakes:
>
> - the correct upstream git commit has been cherry-picked
> - I don't have any objections to attribution or log messages
>
> Thanks again for shepherding this one th
I had a look at the two proposals and could not spot any obvious
mistakes:
- the correct upstream git commit has been cherry-picked
- I don't have any objections to attribution or log messages
Thanks again for shepherding this one through!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
I concur with option 2), unnecessary deviation will just cause
confusion.
Regarding the other buffer sizes, the last time I looked they were
mostly OK. The issue reared its head in this particular case because the
netlink message that previously had a pretty constant per-netdev
response size sudde
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~nacc/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+git/iproute2/+merge/332530
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~nacc/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+git/iproute2/+merge/332531
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I have set up two MPs with the adjustments (it looks like Monique's
latest debdiffs followed path 2) from my previous comment already) to
the DEP3 headers that I think make the most sense. Please take a look at
them and if you approve the changes I will upload them.
I note also there are a number
On 19.10.2017 [09:35:19 -], Jan Gutter wrote:
> @nacc
>
> Thanks so much for the explanation. I also found
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/KnowledgeBase#Merge_Proposals_and_Reviewing
> that details a bit more of the internal processes. As relative outsiders
> to the Ubuntu process, I'd ap
@nacc
Thanks so much for the explanation. I also found
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/KnowledgeBase#Merge_Proposals_and_Reviewing
that details a bit more of the internal processes. As relative outsiders
to the Ubuntu process, I'd appreciate it very much if you could handle
that part for Moniqu
** Patch added: "iproute2_4.3.0-1ubuntu3.16.0.4.2.debdiff (Xenial)"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+bug/1720126/+attachment/4975630/+files/iproute2_4.3.0-1ubuntu3.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which
** Patch added: "iproute2_3.12.0-2ubuntu1.1.debdiff (Trusty)"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+bug/1720126/+attachment/4975629/+files/iproute2_3.12.0-2ubuntu1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is su
@mvandenberg,
Couple of nits in your debdiffs.
1) changelogs are targetting UNRELEASED, please update to xenial and
trusty respectively.
2) Is there a reason your fix is different than the fix upstream/Debian?
Does Debian need your version instead?
3) Please use appropriate DEP3 headers (dpkg-s
On 17.10.2017 [08:56:17 -], Jan Gutter wrote:
> @nacc I built from source to verify that the one-liner is directly
> responsible for fixing and breaking the issue (inherent paranoia). I did
> test with the binaries and they worked.
Ah ok, yeah -- I guess that's reasonable, and is a good preemp
This is a debdiff for iproute2 applicable to 4.3.0-1ubuntu3. I built this in
pbuilder
and it builds successfully, and I installed it, the patch works as intended.
** Patch added: "Xenial"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+bug/1720126/+attachment/4973449/+files/iproute2_4.3.0
@nacc I built from source to verify that the one-liner is directly
responsible for fixing and breaking the issue (inherent paranoia). I did
test with the binaries and they worked.
Apologies, I'm unfamiliar with the Ubuntu SRU process as you can
probably see. What exactly is an "MP" and how would o
This is a debdiff for iproute2 applicable to 3.12.0-2ubuntu1. I built this in
pbuilder
and it builds successfully, and I installed it, the patch works as intended.
** Patch added: "iproute2_3.12.0-2ubuntu1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+bug/1720126/+attachment/49
This is a debdiff for iproute2 applicable to 3.12.0-2ubuntu1. I built this in
pbuilder
and it builds successfully, and I installed it, the patch works as intended.
** Patch removed: "iproute2_3.12.0-2ubuntu1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+bug/1720126/+attachment/
This is a debdiff for iproute2 applicable to 3.12.0-2. I built this in pbuilder
and it builds successfully, and I installed it, the patch works as intended.
** Patch added: "iproute2_3.12.0-2ubuntu1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+source/iproute2/+bug/1720126/+attachment/497
** Attachment removed: "Changelog"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+bug/1720126/+attachment/4969928/+files/changelog
** Attachment added: "Change"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+bug/1720126/+attachment/4970030/+files/changelog
--
You received this
** Patch added: "Patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+bug/1720126/+attachment/4969909/+files/99-increase-receive-buffer-size.patch
** Attachment removed: "Changelog"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+bug/1720126/+attachment/4969908/+files/changelog
** Attachment added: "Changelog"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+bug/1720126/+attachment/4969908/+files/changelog
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
** Attachment added: "Changelog"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+bug/1720126/+attachment/4969928/+files/changelog
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
## Description: Fix "Message truncated" issue with many VF's
## Origin/Author: Jan Gutter
## Bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+bug/1720126
Index: iproute2/lib/libnetlink.c
===
--- iproute2.orig/lib/libnetlink.c
@nacc How would one backport the solution?
Would you please propose the MPs.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1720126
Title:
[ip link] Message truncated err
@jangutter: I'm not sure why you built from source? I assume you
actually tested the version in 17.04 and it worked.
The proper solution is to backport the Debian change to xenial and
trusty, most likely. A git repository that can be used with `git-ubuntu`
(sudo snap install --classic git-ubuntu`)
** Also affects: iproute2 (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: iproute2 (Ubuntu Zesty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: iproute2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Changed in: iproute2 (Ubuntu Xenial)
Stat
Yes, I've confirmed it's fixed there.
I build it from the .dsc, and didn't see "Message truncated".
Then, just to make sure, I reverted the patch (changing the buf size to
16384) and the bug was back.
So at least there's been some use in real world of the patch, I hope...
What's the path of lea
Is this then fixed in Ubuntu 17.04 which has iproute2 version
4.9.0-1ubuntu1?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1720126
Title:
[ip link] Message truncated er
** Description changed:
- I've ran into an issue when creating a large number of virtual functions
- on a SR-IOV capable device.
+ [Impact]
- ip link show reports a message truncated error:
+ When querying a Physical Function netdev with a large amount of VF's
+ (more than 30), the resulting re
The attachment "[PATCH] Fix "Message truncated" issue with many VF's"
seems to be a patch. If it isn't, please remove the "patch" flag from
the attachment, remove the "patch" tag, and if you are a member of the
~ubuntu-reviewers, unsubscribe the team.
[This is an automated message performed by a
This fix has been pulled into CentOS 7.3 and later
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1720126
Title:
[ip link] Message truncated error for large number of pas
This bug has already been fixed upstream in the following commit:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/pkg-
iproute.git/commit/?id=72b365e8e0fd5efe1d5c05d04c25950736635cfb
This commit happened between: tags debian/4.3.0-1 and debian/4.6.0-1
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1380803
I'm unfamiliar with where to submit the fix for this bug. Am I
submitting the fix to the wrong forum?
** Patch added: "[PATCH] Fix "Message truncated" issue with many VF's"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+bug/1720126/+attachment/4966551/+files/iproute2-fix-netlink-overflow.
** Changed in: iproute2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1720126
Title:
[ip link] Message truncated error for larg
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: iproute2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
A simple one-line patch seems to solve the issue for me:
Index: iproute2-4.3.0/lib/libnetlink.c
===
--- iproute2-4.3.0.orig/lib/libnetlink.c
+++ iproute2-4.3.0/lib/libnetlink.c
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ int rtnl_dump_filter_l(struct rtnl_ha
Public bug reported:
I've ran into an issue when creating a large number of virtual functions
on a SR-IOV capable device.
ip link show reports a message truncated error:
ip link show > /dev/null
Message truncated
Message truncated
Message truncated
A likely cause might be that when called in a s
58 matches
Mail list logo
