** Also affects: binutils-arm64-cross (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: binutils-armel-cross (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: binutils-armhf-cross (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: binuti
This bug was fixed in the package binutils - 2.24-5ubuntu13
---
binutils (2.24-5ubuntu13) trusty-proposed; urgency=medium
* SRU LP: #1311866.
* Update from the 2.24 branch, 20141113.
- Fix PR gold/16945, properly handle 64-bit GOT relocations on x86_64.
- Fix PR gold/16900
This bug was fixed in the package gcc-4.8 - 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04
---
gcc-4.8 (4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04) trusty-proposed; urgency=medium
* SRU LP: #1311866.
* Fix PR tree-optimization/63341 (wrong code, rs6000).
* Allow to turn off -Wformat using Wno-format. LP: #1401836.
* Fix PR
verification succeeded for all gcc-4.8 issues mentioned in the gcc-4.8
4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04 changelog entry
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed t
verification succeeded for all binutils issues.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gcc-4.8 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1311866
Title:
update binutils and GCC for trusty
Status in binutils packag
Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gcc-4.8 into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.8/4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
h
Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,
Accepted binutils into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/2.24-5ubuntu13 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https
> to make it clear, there never was a "no-change rebuild". no,
> ppc64el isn't a regression, it successfully built in the updates
> test rebuild.
Ok, thanks for the clarification. I somehow had the impression that
http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~wgrant/rebuild-ftbfs-test/test-
rebuild-20150317-upda
On 05/09/2015 01:25 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> firefox: https://launchpad.net/bugs/1451453
>>arm64 only, not a regression
>
> firefox failed to build on both arm64 and ppc64el in the toolchain test
> rebuild, but only failed on arm64 in a no-change rebuild.
to make it clear, there never
> firefox: https://launchpad.net/bugs/1451453
>arm64 only, not a regression
firefox failed to build on both arm64 and ppc64el in the toolchain test
rebuild, but only failed on arm64 in a no-change rebuild.
/usr/bin/ld.bfd.real: ../libjs_static.a(linux64.o): ABI version 1 is not
compatibl
here is the analysis of the build failures. afaics, there is only one
toolchain related build failure, u-boot. Both upstream and debian
already stopped building that one, and this ZUMA platform was never
supported in Ubuntu 14.04 LTS.
bzr: https://launchpad.net/bugs/1451448
regression with
updated test rebuilds:
http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~wgrant/rebuild-ftbfs-test/test-rebuild-20150317-updates-trusty.html
http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~wgrant/rebuild-ftbfs-test/test-rebuild-20150317-security-trusty.html
note that firefox now fails with a linker error, before fixing gcc-4.8,
it fa
** Description changed:
an SRU issue to document the update of gcc-4.8 in trusty
+
+ 14.04 LTS saw two new architectures, arm64 and ppc64el. These require
+ some updates for the toolchain. binutils takes some selected patches to
+ fix specific issues, and gcc-4.8 takes the state of the current
13 matches
Mail list logo
