[Touch-packages] [Bug 2096914] Re: rsync 3.3.0-1ubuntu0.1 patch breaks IPv6 over SSH: "ssh: Could not resolve hostname x: Name or service not known"

@enr0n No, the "ssh -4" is still explicitly present -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2096914 Title: rsync 3.3.0-1ubuntu0.1 patch breaks IPv6 over SSH: "ssh: Co

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2096914] Re: rsync 3.3.0-1ubuntu0.1 patch breaks IPv6 over SSH: "ssh: Could not resolve hostname x: Name or service not known"

(I don´t know how to edit comments) If you "-e ssh -6", rsync still add a -4... so you end up with "ssh -6 ... -4 ..." and the problem remain. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu. https://bugs.laun

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2096914] Re: rsync 3.3.0-1ubuntu0.1 patch breaks IPv6 over SSH: "ssh: Could not resolve hostname x: Name or service not known"

And I can confirm that the Debian version fix the problem. But strange enough, the 3.3.0 package bundle rsync 3.4.0 http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/r/rsync/rsync_3.3.0+ds1-4_amd64.deb rsync version 3.4.0 protocol version 32 Copyright (C) 1996-2024 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2096914] Re: rsync 3.3.0-1ubuntu0.1 patch breaks IPv6 over SSH: "ssh: Could not resolve hostname x: Name or service not known"

I can add that for some reasons, ipv6 is not compiled in anymore in 3.3.0 (see capabilities in rsync --version): rsync version 3.3.0 protocol version 31 Copyright (C) 1996-2024 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others. Web site: https://rsync.samba.org/ Capabilities: 64-bit files, 64-bi