** Summary changed:
- slapd fails to start under systemd
+ slapd missing apparmor profile, and when applied, fails to start under systemd
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
Confirmed for questing as well.
** Also affects: openldap (Ubuntu Plucky)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: openldap (Ubuntu Questing)
Importance: High
Status: Triaged
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Plucky)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: op
This is surprising to me in at least two levels:
a) Why wasn't this caught before? Seems so basic
b) The slapd apparmor profile doesn't seem to be applied by default. It
used to be, or so I thought.
Did you have to enable it by hand? I checked and there is nothing in the
slapd maintainer scripts
The verification of the Stable Release Update for spirv-llvm-
translator-18 has completed successfully and the package is now being
released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates
Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug
report. In the event th
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gtk4 has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a reg
> - test that src:primus builds and binaries install without changes
I performed this test as well, in a noble amd64 container, unpacking
src:primus, installing build-dependencies with noble-proposed enabled, and
manually installing bin:libglapi-amber which replaced bin:libglapi-mesa. The
buil
The verification of the Stable Release Update for base-files has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounte
Considering comments #17, #18, and #19, noble verification is done.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-noble
** Tags added: verification-done-noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bug
noble verification (continued)
c) armhf
- no autopkgtest failure
- no build failure:
- armhf build log:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/809037926/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-armhf.gtk4_4.14.5+ds-0ubuntu0.4_BUILDING.txt.gz
Tests match previous results:
x11:
Ok: 578
Expected Fail:
Robie did a review in matrix and gave a +1 with certain conditions
outlined in the thread[1].
1.
https://matrix.to/#/!QMtJBibTYYOCvXJEdv:ubuntu.com/$TY6EA0eKrpqKf8wsChVKNnj1Xg513kfbzDz1Da-
KbU4?via=ubuntu.com&via=matrix.org&via=matrix.debian.social
--
You received this bug notification because
Uploaded to noble unapproved with -v4.14.5+ds-0ubuntu0.1:
Uploading gtk4_4.14.5+ds-0ubuntu0.4.dsc
Uploading gtk4_4.14.5+ds-0ubuntu0.4.debian.tar.xz
Uploading gtk4_4.14.5+ds-0ubuntu0.4_source.buildinfo
Uploading gtk4_4.14.5+ds-0ubuntu0.4_source.changes
--
You received this bug notification because
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
There are a number of gtk4 tests (build-time, and again at autopkgtest
time) that are failing on s390x *only* when run in the combination of an
updated mesa package (25.0.7-0ubuntu0.24.04.1).
s390x is not a desktop platform, there are no desktop i
Hello Ural, or anyone else affected,
Accepted base-files into noble-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base-
files/13ubuntu10.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:/
Thank you for the detailed verification!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966203
Title:
journal shows "systemd-udevd[2837]: nvme0n1: Process ... failed with
Hi @AaronMa, I see you did the verification in comments #24 and #25, but
there have been new uploads of spirv-llvm-translator-*. Would you be
able to repeat the verification with those new packages? If not, is
there confidence that a new verification is not needed, and what would
be the justificati
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted spirv-llvm-translator-18 into noble-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spirv-llvm-
translator-18/18.1.8-1~ubuntu0.24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us b
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted spirv-llvm-translator-17 into noble-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spirv-llvm-
translator-17/17.0.8-1~ubuntu0.24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us b
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted spirv-llvm-translator-16 into noble-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spirv-llvm-
translator-16/16.0.1-1~ubuntu0.24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us b
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted spirv-llvm-translator-15 into noble-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spirv-llvm-
translator-15/15.0.1-1~ubuntu0.24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us b
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted spirv-llvm-translator-14 into noble-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spirv-llvm-
translator-14/14.0.8-1~ubuntu0.24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us b
I've seen a lot of symbols changes in spirv-llvm-translator-14, too many
to be sure I didn't miss anything. From what I could check, they seem to
have only changed in MISSING and optional symbols, i.e., no symbols were
removed that shouldn't have been.
** Changed in: spirv-llvm-translator-14 (Ubun
Please comment/ask in LP: #2118912, let's try to concentrate the
discussion there, thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080216
Title:
sshd cannot bind t
@r41k0u that log shows a run from the 24th, before the new rules were
implemented:
0s autopkgtest [14:54:31]: starting date and time: 2025-07-24 14:54:31+
Please retry the test today.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which i
Can we please focus on landing the change to questing first? I see
reviews done in noble (but that cannot be uploaded until later releases
also have it), and the questing one attached to this bug seems old. Is
Dave's branch the most current work here?
--
You received this bug notification because
Is the 8 bytes salt working in focal fips because there it's FIPS 140-2,
and not FIPS 140-3 like in jammy?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107773
Title:
[S
Maybe systemd on ppc64el too?
1974s Reading package lists...
1974s E: The repository 'http://ports.ubuntu.com plucky InRelease' is not
signed.
1974s E: Failed to fetch http://ports.ubuntu.com/dists/plucky/InRelease 403
Forbidden [IP: 10.151.41.7 3128]
1974s E: Failed to fetch http://ports.ubun
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2110460
Title:
Merge krb5 from Debian Unstable for questing
Sta
Hello Jimmy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted snapd into plucky-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/2.68.5+ubuntu25.04.2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Plucky)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: snapd (Ubuntu Plucky)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Questing)
Importance: High
Status: Invalid
** Also affects: snapd (Ubuntu Questing)
Hi Ghadi,
thanks for your efforts, but unfortunately since this bug involves both
userspace and kernel, conducting the testing in an ubuntu lxc container
while the host is not ubuntu at the release that is being tested is not
valid.
Please note I'm merely asking to follow the test plan that was a
Regarding this gsasl error:
- gsasl/2.2.2-2ubuntu1/arm64
[doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file
/tmp/tmp.DXPuLQ1W9A/d/dovecot.conf line 1: Unknown setting:
dovecot_config_version]
It needs dovecot from questing-proposed to pass. In other words, add
this to the autopkgtest line for
> I'm not sure it warrants a verification-failed because it does not
cause regressions
It's also a useless update for non-amd64 architectures, which also
carries a risk of regression, and we will have to do another SRU later
on, again, to actually fix the bug on the reported platform.
I think it'
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ubuntu-settings has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you enc
Thanks for the verification of the test plan!
I have a question, though. The first part of the test plan says:
> 4. check the return value based on different scenarios:
> - plugged in using usb-c
> - plugged in using another non usb port
> - not plugged it at all
> - with a usb-c device plugged i
I'm concerned that the verification was done only on amd64, and not
arm64 which is where this bug was first reported on.
Could we have the test plan verification done on arm64 please?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscri
The ubuntu-boot-test failure seems to be about LP: #2116119, a PS7
network restriction.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080216
Title:
sshd cannot bind to I
Please include an upgrade case which has something that requires
libglapi-mesa installed (like primus-libs and primus), and then
upgrading to the new packages. This should show bin:libglapi-mesa being
replaced by bin:libglapi-amber, and primus should keep working, if
that's possible to check.
--
Removed as requested:
Removing packages from oracular-proposed:
initramfs-tools 0.142ubuntu34.3 in oracular
initramfs-tools 0.142ubuntu34.3 in oracular amd64
initramfs-tools 0.142ubuntu34.3 in oracular arm64
initramfs-tools 0.142ubuntu34.3 in
I have some comments about the mesa upload:
- update-maintainer was not run for these packages: spirv-headers
directx-headers spirv-tools. Not a blocker, though.
- could a mesa update also affect internet browsers? If yes, could you please
include a simple browser test case to the test plan? Per
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted directx-headers into noble-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/directx-
headers/1.614.1-1~ubuntu0.24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this ne
Hello Chengen, or anyone else affected,
Accepted systemd into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/255.4-1ubuntu8.10 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:
Also tested on ARM64 affected CPU with oracular and plucky vms.
Changes are there and the output is correct with the new version.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-oracular verification-needed-plucky
** Tags added: verification-done-oracular verification-done-plucky
--
You received this bug n
Ran the testplan on
- amd64: No difference between the installed package and the one in proposed
except `CPU(s) scaling MHz:` which is to be expected since it is a live value.
Was tested on noble, oracular and plucky
- arm64 with a CPU != (Cortex-X925 || Cortex-A725): No difference
between ins
Please also update the test plan with an additional check to cover for
the regression from LP: #2115574
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libpciaccess in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2111684
Title:
focal is EOL
** Changed in: gzip (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gzip in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083700
Title:
rsyslog FTBFS due to gzip diffe
# Noble verification
I checked the build logs[1] of rsyslog 8.2312.0-3ubuntu9.1/s390x[2] for
noble, and confirmed that:
a) it used this version of gzip from noble-proposed:
Get:17 http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu noble-proposed/main s390x gzip s390x
1.12-1ubuntu3.1 [106 kB]
b) The tests that we
Oops, I had forgotten about this SRU.
# Oracular verification
I checked the build logs[1] of rsyslog 8.2406.0-1ubuntu2.1/s390x[2] for
oracular, and confirmed that:
a) it used this version of gzip from oracular-proposed:
Get:124 http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu oracular-proposed/main s390x gzip
Hello yukine8, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libpciaccess into plucky-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpciaccess/0.17-3ubuntu0.25.04.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new packa
> Perhaps we should backport this change to previous releases as a
security improvement.
There would be a "surprise" component to updating stable releases with that
list, that would have do be discussed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded pack
I do prefer the udev approach as well. I thinkj the kmod diff should be
rejected then.
Are we happy with the list in 70-insecure-fs.rules, or should we augment
it with what was initially suggested in the kmod.diff attachment?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
Updated bug description and SRU justification to address issues raised
by juliank.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2111723
Title:
lscpu wrong core report
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
+ This is a change for hardware enablement.
- This patch fixes the Model Name as well as the grouping of the cpus
- to achieve a correct core per socket count.
+ The current state shows wrong information when issuing the lscpu
+ command. It does not correctl
I agree to not pursue oracular further in this case.
$ remove-package -m "Superseeded by security, decided to not purse further. See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2098183/comments/24"; -s
oracular-proposed -e 256.5-2ubuntu3.2 systemd
Removing packages from oracular-propo
Hello Chengen, or anyone else affected,
Accepted systemd into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/255.4-1ubuntu8.9 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:/
I ran this command to verify that the changes on top of the latest
security update are the same as the original update that was superseeded
by security, and they are:
$ git range-diff pkg/import/255.4-1ubuntu8.6..pkg/import/255.4-1ubuntu8.7
pkg/import/255.4-1ubuntu8.8..queue/noble/unapproved/8ec2
Hi, did you have a chance to look at the upstream fix[1] and determine
if it's something we can use, instead of skipping the troublesome
autopkgtest?
1. https://github.com/gerrymanoim/exchange_calendars/issues/452
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch se
*** Bug 17215 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to eglibc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057526
Title:
getaddrinfo returns PTR name in ai_canonname whe
The verification of the Stable Release Update for qtdeclarative-
opensource-src has completed successfully and the package is now being
released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates
Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug
report. In the even
Ok, thanks for the report. Since it's fixed in ubuntu5.4, I'll mark the
bug as such, and that will also help those who search for this symptom.
** Changed in: net-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
** Tags added: regression-update
--
You received this bug notification beca
Hi,
the latest net-tools version available for jammmy is
1.60+git20181103.0eebece-1ubuntu5.4:
net-tools | 1.60+git20181103.0eebece-1ubuntu5 | jammy | source
net-tools | 1.60+git20181103.0eebece-1ubuntu5.4 | jammy-security| source
net-tools | 1.60+git20181103.0eebece-1ubuntu5.
The verification of the Stable Release Update for runc-app has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for initramfs-tools has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you enc
Hello gerald.yang, or anyone else affected,
Accepted initramfs-tools into noble-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.142ubuntu25.6 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new p
Hello gerald.yang, or anyone else affected,
Accepted initramfs-tools into oracular-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.142ubuntu34.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this ne
The verification of the Stable Release Update for apt has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a regr
The verification of the Stable Release Update for apt has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a regr
I haven't located recent green runs, so I triggered them again for focal
and jammy.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056187
Title:
fails to configur
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
Milestone: ubuntu-25.06 => ubuntu-25.07
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2110460
Title:
Merge krb5 from Debian Unstable for que
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2110460
Title:
Merge krb5 from Deb
** Changed in: rsyslog (Ubuntu Plucky)
Status: In Progress => Confirmed
** Changed in: rsyslog (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscri
The verification of the Stable Release Update for openldap has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
Not really worth an SRU on its own, but this was previously part of a
bigger SRU that regressed, and we haven’t found the reason for that
regression. After some discussion, we agreed to retry those fixes one by
one, in independent SRUs, so let’s just do this one as part of that.
--
You received t
Hello teutat3s, or anyone else affected,
Accepted openssh into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/1:9.6p1-3ubuntu13.12 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
ht
The verification of the Stable Release Update for grilo-plugins has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encou
This is blocked on the oracular verification being done.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to grilo-plugins in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2093324
Title:
Re-enable dLeyna grilo plugin
Status in grilo
** Summary changed:
- OpenSSH autopkgtests do not like tilde character in its version string (e.g.
~ppa1)
+ OpenSSH integrity test fails with specific package version lengths
** Description changed:
+ See comment #10
+
+
Starting with Noble, the openssh autopkgtest "regress" (specifically
Also, kind of expected, if we set on the server DebianBanner=no, then
the test passes.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2091943
Title:
OpenSSH autopkgtests d
Smaller testing set:
openssh/1:9.6p1-3ubuntu13.11+local1:PASS
openssh/1:9.6p1-3ubuntu13.11+local10: FAIL
openssh/1:9.6p1-3ubuntu13.11+local10~1: PASS
"~" is also the ssh escape character, I wonder...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded pac
Ok, there are shenanigans going on with the length of the package
version, as was mentioned here already.
Example (integrity test, with hmac-sha2-512):
openssh/1:9.6p1-3ubuntu13.11+local1: PASS
openssh/1:9.6p1-3ubuntu13.11+local10: FAIL
BUT:
openssh/1:9.6p1-3ubuntu13.11+ccache1: FAIL
openssh/
I can reproduce the failure manually now, in that test environment.
Saving the info here.
root@n-ccache:/tmp/autopkgtest.mlareh/autopkgtest_tmp/user/regress#
/usr/bin/ssh -m hmac-sha2-512 -c aes128-ctr -F /tmp/andreas//regress/ssh_proxy
-o proxycommand="sudo env SSH_SK_HELPER= sh
Interrupting the test at the failure point, so that the mentioned config
files are still as they were, I ran the command manually:
/usr/bin/ssh -m hmac-sha2-512 -c aes128-ctr -F
/tmp/autopkgtest.mlareh/autopkgtest_tmp/user/regress/ssh_proxy -o
proxycommand="sudo env SSH_SK_HELPER= sh /tmp
/autop
Other bits about the banner, from the logs. I don't see anything
obviously truncated:
16:53:44.527442099 O: debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_9.6p1
Ubuntu-3ubuntu13.11+ccache2
16:53:44.528835039 O: debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software
version OpenSSH_9.6p1 Ubuntu-3ubun
I get the first failure on the hmac-sha2-512 check:
16:53:11.951438419 O: test integrity: mac hmac-sha2-256
16:53:11.969490244 O: test integrity: hmac-sha2-256 @2900
16:53:12.154305446 O: test integrity: hmac-sha2-256 @2901
16:53:12.361328972 O: test integrity: hmac-sha2-256 @2902
16:53:12.562176
I just started hitting what looks exactly like this bug, a timeout in
the integrity checks. I'll check your investigation.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2091
Hello Bryce, or anyone else affected,
Accepted openldap into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/2.5.19+dfsg-0ubuntu0.22.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
>From your logs, I see this:
apt remove --purge python3.*
I'm sorry, but that will break your system.
** Changed in: python3-defaults (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
Unless we want to be specific about ubuntu-specific proxy settings, when
the test runs in our infrastructure.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2106664
Title:
This was further troubleshooted this morning, and was a problem with
proxy settings in the test bed in the plucky image being used. This has
since been fixed.
I don't think further action is needed here.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packag
Public bug reported:
I'm seeing a lot of these lately[1]:
4268s + mkosi_tree=/tmp/autopkgtest.9oT0q6/autopkgtest_tmp/mkosi
4268s + git clone https://github.com/systemd/mkosi.git
/tmp/autopkgtest.9oT0q6/autopkgtest_tmp/mkosi
4268s Cloning into '/tmp/autopkgtest.9oT0q6/autopkgtest_tmp/mkosi'...
4
> Algorithms missing in "APT::Key::Assert-Pubkey-Algo" cause errors now,
> whereas algorithms in
> "APT::Key::Assert-Pubkey-Algo::Next" cause warnings.
The word "missing" is, er, missing, in the second part of that sentence,
right? The full correct sentence is (diff capitalized by me):
Algori
# Noble verification
Problem reproduced with:
$ apt-cache policy rsyslog
rsyslog:
Installed: 8.2312.0-3ubuntu9
Candidate: 8.2312.0-3ubuntu9
Version table:
*** 8.2312.0-3ubuntu9 500
500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
[M
Hello Benjamin, or anyone else affected,
Accepted tzdata into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/2025b-0ubuntu0.20.04 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
http
Normally we don't release SRUs which just include a DEP8 fix, like
exchange-calendars, specially given that that fix is skipping the
troublesome test. There is some movement in the upstream issue[1], is
that something we could apply to this package instead of skipping the
test? Otherwise, perhaps a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for rsyslog has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for rsyslog has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for tzdata has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a r
Early releasing tzdata due to impending real world timezone change[1].
1.
https://matrix.to/#/!slcYrFqWytcsbPzMxA:ubuntu.com/$6knNQEJPWkAU2vSpblFW9lkBaWrHQWExERBkjLRDVmA?via=ubuntu.com&via=matrix.org&via=matrix.debian.social
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
The verification of the Stable Release Update for rsyslog has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for rsyslog has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
Public bug reported:
I came here following
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/i386#How_to_expand_i386_port_scope
Assuming this is the right thing to do, I would like to ask that
src:rpds-py also builds on i386. The reason is that currently jq is an
FTBFS[1] in oracular and plucky because:
jq -> Build-Depen
1 - 100 of 1455 matches
Mail list logo
