The verification passed for jammy:
william@william-Latitude-E7470 ~ apt-cache policy udev
udev:
Installed: 249.11-0ubuntu3.7
Candidate: 249.11-0ubuntu3.9
Version table:
249.11-0ubuntu3.9 500
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-proposed/main amd64
Packages
**
Public bug reported:
When building images with livecd-rootfs, there is a hook to set up oem-
config for preinstalled raspi desktop images. As we move away from
livecd-rootfs (and the use of hooks in general), this step should be
moved into a package.
** Affects: ubuntu-settings (Ubuntu)
Impo
The verification passed for jammy:
```
william@william-Latitude-E7470 ~ apt-cache policy udev
udev:
Installed: 249.11-0ubuntu3.7
Candidate: 249.11-0ubuntu3.8
Version table:
*** 249.11-0ubuntu3.8 500
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-proposed/main amd64
Packages
** Tags removed: rls-ll-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Nick Rosbrook (enr0n)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://
This bug was fixed in the package lsb - 11.5
Sponsored for Dave Jones (waveform)
---
lsb (11.5) unstable; urgency=medium
* Team upload.
* Drop lsb-release, taken over by src:lsb-release-minimal.
-- Adam Borowski Wed, 02 Nov 2022 01:41:43 +0100
lsb (11.4) unstable; urgency=med
After some internal team discussion we've agreed to do a force-sync from
Debian to only use the empty transitional package. till-kamppeter has
confirmed that printer drivers have moved to snap based rather than
needing lsb to install.
** Changed in: lsb (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
Thanks for the patch! One comment, when a patch is ready for sponsoring
you can drop the "~ppa2" from the version number. I'll just go ahead and
do that before uploading for this one.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscrib
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1994936
Title:
initramfs need to mount efivarfs because kernel 6.0 deprecated
'efi
** Tags added: foundations-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1994165
Title:
CMS_final: do not ignore CMS_dataFinal result
Status in openssl pa
This appears to be an issue with a missing `/etc/kernel/cmdline` file.
Did that file somehow get removed from your system?
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, whic
** Tags added: foundations-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to fonts-dejavu in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992369
Title:
DejaVu Serif Italic capital letters and digits broken
Status
** Tags added: foundations-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991285
Title:
systemd/245.4-4ubuntu3.18 ADT test failure with linux/5.4.0-128.144
@Oibaf, this bug is fixed in the Ubuntu package in kinetic.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1978738
Title:
systemd-oomd and zram-config services: "Swap is c
This "Operation not permitted" error looks suspicious. @rubiselprieto
can you check the permissions on your /etc/cron.d directory?
** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, wh
** Tags added: foundations-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991553
Title:
can't add a private PPA
Status in software-properties
I'm unable to recreate this issue on a jammy system that has been
upgraded from focal. Can you make sure all of your packages are up to
date? After poking through the vim source code there are no references
to libpng12, so it may be some dependency of vim that is out of date
trying to read it.
**
** Tags added: foundations-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990742
Title:
screen not consistently locking when lid is closed
Status in syste
@arutyun-akopov, can you try the workaround detailed in comment #1?
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
Marking as Won't Fix for pyxdg as it appears this bug has been solved
with fixes in other packages.
** Changed in: pyxdg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pyxdg in Ubuntu
Marking this as won't fix because xenial is no longer supported. All
supported releases have libcap2 2.25 or newer, which fixes this bug.
** Changed in: libcap2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages
** Tags removed: foundations-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842439
Title:
apport-gtk crashed with SIGSEGV in
_gtk_settings_get_screen(sett
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. It seems that there was an error on your system when
trying to update the kernel on your system due to a lack of free space
in your boot partition. Please resolve this situation manually and try
the update again.
Can you check in the control panel under "Privacy" -> "Diagnostics"? If
"Send error reports to Canonical" is set to "Never" then the
whoopsie.path service will be disabled.
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
** Changed in: powermgmt-base (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to powermgmt-base in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980991
Title:
/usr/sbin/on_ac_power incorrec
** Changed in: icu (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Tags added: block-proposed-jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to icu in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976258
Title:
icu ftbfs in
** Description changed:
- as seen in a test rebuild, this package fails to build in the jammy
- release pocket (note the log behind the link might go away):
+ [Impact]
+ * icu is currently FTBFS in the jammy release pocket
+
+ [Test Plan]
+ * Build the package from -proposed against the jammy -pr
Excellent work. Just one comment, it's best practice to add the "please
merge" bug number in the changelog. That way this bug will be
automatically closed when the package is uploaded. I'll go ahead and add
that in before I sponsor it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1960083 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960083
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1960083
dirname applet missing from initramfs
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subs
Public bug reported:
With this patch applied gspell is FTBFS with the following errors:
Bail out! dbind-FATAL-WARNING: Couldn't connect to accessibility bus:
Failed to connect to socket debian/home/.cache/at-spi/bus: No such file
or directory
I removed the patch and rebuilt this package in a PPA
Public bug reported:
When running `lscpu` on arm64, the number of sockets is not populated.
This is seen on both Raspberry Pi hardware and in the autopkgtest
environment. Example output:
Architecture:aarch64
CPU op-mode(s):32-bit, 64-bit
Byte Order:Little Endia
** Tags added: rls-jj-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1650688
Title:
timedatectl set-timezone fails on UC16
Status in Snappy:
Triaged
Status in
** Patch added: "Diff from Debian"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1951161/+attachment/5541800/+files/debian_ubuntu.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bu
** Patch added: "Diff from 1:4.8.1-1ubuntu9"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1951161/+attachment/5541799/+files/ubuntu_ubuntu.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
Thanks for catching that alexmurray. I'll upload new debdiffs in a
moment.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951161
Title:
Please merge shadow 1:4.8.1-2 (main
** Patch added: "Diff from Debian"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1951161/+attachment/5541538/+files/debian_ubuntu.debdiff
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)
Assignee: William Wilson (jawn-smith) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)
** Patch added: "Diff from Debian"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1951161/+attachment/5541536/+files/debian_ubuntu.debdiff
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => William Wilson (jawn-smith)
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)
Stat
** Patch added: "Diff from 1:4.8.1-1ubuntu9"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1951161/+attachment/5541537/+files/ubuntu_ubuntu.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
** Patch added: "Diff from 1:4.8.1-1ubuntu9"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1951161/+attachment/5541535/+files/ubuntu_ubuntu.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
This merge is necessary because there are changes present in Ubuntu that
are not present in Debian.
** Affects: shadow (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, wh
This patch moves the configuration option to the appropriate section of
d/rules and adds a reference to this bug report.
** Patch added: "lp1944621.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1944621/+attachment/5528491/+files/lp1944621.debdiff
--
You received this bug no
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Assignee: William Wilson (jawn-smith) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Patch added: "Configure without closefrom"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1944621/+attachment/5527126/+files/lp1944621.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
h
I created upstream bugs to track this:
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3349
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28377
** Bug watch added: OpenSSH Portable Bugzilla #3349
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3349
** Bug watch added: Sourceware.org Bugzilla #283
.34 implementation of fallback_closefrom fails if
/proc/self/fd is not present, which is a valid sshd use case.
** Affects: openssh (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: William Wilson (jawn-smith)
Status: New
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => W
Actually, a feature of openssh is being able to use a chroot that
doesn't look like a root filesystem, so we'll have to consider how to
move forward on this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
h
Mounting /proc in the chroot fixed the test. I'll prepare a patch and an
upstream bug report.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1941799
Title:
Please merge op
So this is fun, the upstream openssh actually has the same test failure
when running `make tests`. So it doesn't appear to be something we
introduced here, but it is definitely a problem that needs solving.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded pack
Bryceh: I've been looking into this a bit. Removing the --oknodo had no
effect on the tests, and neither did removing the diff that we carry
from Debian. I've also noticed that the issue only occurs on kernel <=
5.8. The tests all pass when run in a test environment with kernel 5.11
or 5.13, which
paelzer: I worked the merge under
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1941799
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939751
Title:
openssh FTBF
** Patch added: "Diff from 1:8.4p1-5ubuntu2"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1941799/+attachment/5521261/+files/lp1941799-ubuntu-ubuntu.debdiff
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Assignee: William Wilson (jawn-smith) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: op
This diff from Debian still includes the seccomp fixes pulled in for
glibc 2.33, as they are still relevant with glibc 2.34. These are in
upstream openssh version 8.5, so when Debian gets to 8.5 we can sync and
drop the diff.
** Patch added: "Diff from Debian"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu
Public bug reported:
This merge is needed because there are changes in Ubuntu that are not
present in Debian.
** Affects: openssh (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: William Wilson (jawn-smith)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Assignee
@paelzer I would be happy to work on the merge if you would like.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939751
Title:
openssh FTBFS with glibc >= 2.34
Status in
** Patch added: "lp1939751.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/openssh/+bug/1939751/+attachment/5517643/+files/lp1939751.debdiff
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Confirmed
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Assignee: William Wilso
: New => In Progress
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => William Wilson (jawn-smith)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939751
Public bug reported:
Due to an incompatible function prototype in openbsd-compat tests, this
package FTBFS with glibc >= 2.34. There is an upstream patch already in
place to address this.
** Affects: openssh (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notif
** Patch added: "Diff from 67.1-6ubuntu2"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icu/+bug/1939728/+attachment/5517575/+files/lp1939728_ubuntu_ubuntu.debdiff
** Changed in: icu (Ubuntu)
Assignee: William Wilson (jawn-smith) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: icu (Ubuntu)
** Patch added: "Diff from 67.1-6ubuntu2"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icu/+bug/1939728/+attachment/5517573/+files/lp1939728_ubuntu_ubuntu.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to icu in Ubuntu.
** Patch added: "Diff from Debian"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icu/+bug/1939728/+attachment/5517574/+files/lp1939728_debian_ubuntu.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to icu in Ubuntu.
https:
** Changed in: icu (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: icu (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => William Wilson (jawn-smith)
** Patch added: "Diff from Debian"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icu/+bug/1939728/+attachmen
Public bug reported:
This requires a merge because there are changes in the Ubuntu version
not present in the Debian version.
** Affects: icu (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
This was fixed previously in hirsute by an upstream merge that resulted
in bluez 5.56-0ubuntu1
** Changed in: bluez (Ubuntu Hirsute)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: bluez (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
The verification passed for focal.
jawn-smith@focal-vm:~$ apt-cache policy passwd
passwd:
Installed: 1:4.8.1-1ubuntu5.20.04
Candidate: 1:4.8.1-1ubuntu5.20.04.1
Version table:
1:4.8.1-1ubuntu5.20.04.1 500
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-proposed/main amd64
Packages
The verification passed for hirsute.
jawn-smith@lvm:~$ apt-cache policy passwd
passwd:
Installed: 1:4.8.1-1ubuntu8
Candidate: 1:4.8.1-1ubuntu8.1
Version table:
1:4.8.1-1ubuntu8.1 500
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu hirsute-proposed/main amd64
Packages
*** 1:4.8.1-1ubun
The attached patch fixes the issue in focal
** Patch added: "Focal SRU"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1927078/+attachment/5510997/+files/lp197078_focal.debdiff
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: shadow (Ubun
The attached patch fixes the issue for hirsute.
** Patch added: "Hirsute Patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1927078/+attachment/5510996/+files/lp1927078_hirsute.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, w
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu Hirsute)
Assignee: (unassigned) => William Wilson (jawn-smith)
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu Focal)
Assignee: (unassigned) => William Wilson (jawn-smith)
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu Hirsute)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed i
** Description changed:
- [Description]
+ [Impact]
+
+ * If a fully numeric username is created, it will cause
+problems with systemd. One example is that the user with
+this type of name can log in, but loginctl will not create
+a session for them.
+ * This can also cause users to
Per our discussion I just removed floating point checks altogether.
"0.123" is now considered valid because it is impossible to have a
floating point uid or gid so there will be no confusion with floating
point numbers. I have added those floating point numbers to the
"validUsernames" test, and add
This one adds in a check for octal representation and some test cases
for octal representation.
** Patch added: "Octal included this time"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1927078/+attachment/5510554/+files/lp1927078_fully_numeric_and_hex_and_octal.debdiff
--
You receive
This change disallows floating point and hexadecimal representations of
numbers as well as purely numeric, which should be a good compromise.
For example, 0x0 is now invalid, as well as 0x123456789 and 0.0, while
0x0x0x0x is considered valid. It also adds these new restrictions to the
man page.
**
This patch only disallows usernames that are strictly numeric per
vorlon's comment above. It also adds more test cases for invalid
usernames such as "0123456789" and valid usernames such as "0root" and
"0.o". This time I also remembered that '0' is a digit.
** Patch added: "Fully numeric and more
I'd be happy to make that change and add the test cases, but I'm still
not sure which patch we landed on. I'm rather indifferent so I will
leave the discussion to others before adding those test cases to
whichever method we decide.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Attached is a patch that disallows fully numeric usernames while still
allowing usernames such as 91jawn-smith.
** Patch added: "Disallow Fully Numeric Patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1927078/+attachment/5505363/+files/lp1927078_fully_numeric.debdiff
--
You recei
@Seth that very incorrect comment is actually part of block of upstream
code that is commented out. It doesn't apply to the more relaxed Debian
username scheme.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
This fix for impish uses sbeattie's suggestion of simply disallowing a
numeric character at the beginning of the username. It also includes a
test case.
** Patch added: "lp1927078.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1927078/+attachment/5505076/+files/lp1927078.debdif
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu Impish)
Assignee: (unassigned) => William Wilson (jawn-smith)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927078
Title:
Don'
The attached patch cleans up the switch statement to not replicate the
xwarn.
** Patch added: "lp1903351_cleanup.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1903351/+attachment/5501733/+files/lp1903351_cleanup.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
This diff from the previous Ubuntu version of the package is very large.
That is mostly due to the new language packs and autoconf files present
in the new Debian version of the package.
This diff also addresses bug 1903351 by correcting the patches we carry
for ignore_erofs and ignore_eaccess
**
This diff from the previous Ubuntu version of the package is very large.
That is mostly due to the new language packs and autoconf files present
in the new Debian version of the package.
This diff also addresses bug 1903351 by correcting the patches we carry
for ignore_erofs and ignore_eaccess
**
This diff from Debian merges in the new Debian version while keeping
some diffs that we have carried for many versions.
** Patch removed: "Diff from Debian"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1928966/+attachment/5500321/+files/procps-debian-ubuntu.debdiff
** Patch removed:
This diff from the previous Ubuntu version of the package is very large.
That is mostly due to the new language packs and autoconf files present
in the new Debian version of the package.
This diff also addresses bug 1903351 by correcting the patches we carry
for ignore_erofs and ignore_eaccess
**
This diff from Debian merges in the new Debian version while keeping
some diffs that we have carried for many versions. There is a new diff,
which is an autopkgtest for the stack limit issue that was seen in bug
1874824. This test has been submitted to Debian under bug 988792.
Justification of dro
This corrected patch accounts for the apport-hooks now being present in
Debian.
** Patch added: "Diff from Debian"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sudo/+bug/1929110/+attachment/5500040/+files/sudo-debian-ubuntu.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
This corrected patch accounts for the apport-hooks now being present in
Debian.
** Patch added: "Diff from 1.9.5p2-2ubuntu3"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sudo/+bug/1929110/+attachment/5500041/+files/sudo-ubuntu-ubuntu.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are
** Changed in: sudo (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: sudo (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => William Wilson (jawn-smith)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sudo in Ubuntu.
** Patch added: "Diff from Debian"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sudo/+bug/1929110/+attachment/5499101/+files/sudo-debian-ubuntu.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sudo in Ubuntu.
https://b
** Patch added: "Diff from 1.9.5p2-2ubuntu3"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sudo/+bug/1929110/+attachment/5499102/+files/sudo-ubuntu-ubuntu.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sudo in Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
This requires a merge because there are changes in the Ubuntu version
not present in the Debian version.
** Affects: sudo (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
Public bug reported:
This requires a merge because there are changes in the Ubuntu version
not present in the Debian version.
** Affects: procps (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded package
The verification passed for focal.
* On Pi 400 **
ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ apt-cache policy bluez pi-bluetooth linux-firmware-raspi2
bluez:
Installed: 5.53-0ubuntu3
Candidate: 5.53-0ubuntu3.1
Version table:
5.53-0ubuntu3.1 500
500 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports foc
The verification passed for groovy:
ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ apt-cache policy apport
apport:
Installed: 2.20.11-0ubuntu50.5
Candidate: 2.20.11-0ubuntu50.6
Version table:
2.20.11-0ubuntu50.6 500
500 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports groovy-proposed/main arm64
Packages
*** 2.20.11-0u
The verification passed for focal:
ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ apt-cache policy apport
apport:
Installed: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.16
Candidate: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.17
Version table:
2.20.11-0ubuntu27.17 500
500 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports focal-proposed/main armhf
Packages
*** 2.20.11-0
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986836
Apparently I had not created the bug report correctly the first time.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #986836
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986836
--
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
I have submitted a Debian bug report with the patch suggested, and
updated the bug description.
bluez is pre-installed on the desktop images, but not the server images.
This warning would be very useful for server users that want to install
bluez for the first time.
--
You received this bug noti
** Description changed:
- In the case of upgrading bluez on certain raspberry pi devices, a reboot
- may be required to apply the changes. We should add a check for this
- scenario in the postinst script.
+ In the case of upgrading or installing bluez for the first time on
+ certain raspberry pi d
The verification passed for focal:
jawn-smith@focal-vm:~$ apt-cache policy procps
procps:
Installed: 2:3.3.16-1ubuntu2
Candidate: 2:3.3.16-1ubuntu2.1
Version table:
2:3.3.16-1ubuntu2.1 500
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-proposed/main amd64
Packages
*** 2:3.3.16-
Seb,
A reboot is needed in this case because the bluetooth device on the
raspberry pi has to be initialized at boot time. Restarting the service
will not cause the device to be brought up.
The hardcoded addresses are the approach used in the pi-bluetooth
package, and recommended by waveform.
As
Attached is a patch for Hirsute. If this is accepted I will SRU to focal
and groovy.
** Changed in: bluez (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => William Wilson (jawn-smith)
** Patch added: "Hirsute Patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/1922792/+attac
Robie,
pgrep and pkill are sharing the same code. Essentially pkill runs pgrep
and then issues a kill signal to the resulting pid. Therefore this fix
applies to both pkill and pgrep. Additionally, the source of the problem
comes from the behavior of `sysconf(_SC_ARG_MAX)` changing in newer
kernels
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
