[Touch-packages] [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/

** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~whershberger/ubuntu/+source/dconf/+git/dconf/+merge/489722 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072586 T

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/

** Description changed: [ Impact ] This was originally reported by a user applying the DISA-STIG on Ubuntu desktop [1], which requires a global umask of 077. The global dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db are intended to be read by many users (mode 644). dconf uses g_file_set_contents

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/

ortance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: dconf (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Wesley Hershberger (whershberger) ** Changed in: dconf (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Wesley Hershberger (whershberger) ** Changed in: dconf (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: Undeci

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2078599] Re: unbound-resolvconf.service fails in LXD

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1106186 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1106186 ** Also affects: unbound via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1106186 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/

I had a few conversations with Heitor, Matthew & Jeremy last week regarding this SRU. Heitor and Matthew (SRU Sponsors for Sustaining Engineering) are both hesitant to sponsor this due to the potential blast radius of a change of semantics in g_file_set_contents (see debian codesearch at [1][2]; th

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/

Thanks for the note; I've opened MRs against that repo: https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/glib/-/merge_requests/49 https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/glib/-/merge_requests/50 https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/glib/-/merge_requests/51 https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/glib/-/merge_requests/5

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/

** Description changed: [ Impact ] This was originally reported by a user applying the DISA-STIG on Ubuntu desktop [1], which requires a global umask of 077. The global dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db are intended to be read by many users (mode 644). dconf uses g_file_set_contents

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/

** Description changed: [ Impact ] This was originally reported by a user applying the DISA-STIG on Ubuntu desktop [1], which requires a global umask of 077. The global dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db are intended to be read by many users (mode 644). dconf uses g_file_set_contents

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/

** Description changed: + [ Impact ] + + This was originally reported by a user applying the DISA-STIG on Ubuntu + desktop [1], which requires a global umask of 077. The global dconf databases + in /etc/dconf/db are intended to be read by many users (mode 644). + + dconf uses g_file_set_contents

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/

** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Plucky) Status: Triaged =>

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/

[3] https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/merge_requests/4608 ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Oracular) Assignee: (unassigned) => Wesley Hershberger (whershberger) -- You received this bug notification because you are a m

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/

** Description changed: [ Test Plan ] ``` sudo apt-get install dconf-cli mkdir -p /etc/dconf/db/database.d cat >/etc/dconf/db/database.d/test

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2104840] Re: sudo_logsrvd TLS log transport in Jammy

** Tags added: sts ** Also affects: sudo (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sudo in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2104840 Title: sudo_logsrv

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2104840] [NEW] sudo_logsrvd TLS log transport in Jammy

Public bug reported: [ Impact ] Users of sudo_logsrvd in Jammy are unable to configure TLS transport as sudo was built without OpenSSL in Jammy. This functionality is available in Noble and above as OpenSSL was inadvertantly included in sudo builds: 564d6d7f in cyrus-sasl2 introduced an indirec

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2056187] Re: fails to configure BOOTIF when using iscsi

Hi, just checking in on the status of this since LP#2093164 is waiting on it. Is this still blocked? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056187 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1597017] Re: mount rules grant excessive permissions

Hi, gentle ping on this; is there an ETA for this to land in 22.04? Let me know if I can help with testing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1597017 Title: