Sadly I forgot to add the bug number to the changelog, but the fixed
package is in oracular. Thanks.
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
Thanks, Ryan. Looks good to me. Could you post a diff of the dpkg
--contents of the built files?
Looks like the same is true in the debian unstable package. I'd suggest
we fix it here and then see whether debian is willing to take this
patch.
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu)
Status: New => C
** Package changed: gnome-online-accounts (Ubuntu) => gdm3 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gnome-online-accounts in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076752
Title:
Gnome session crashes if mo
Public bug reported:
Recently installed and fully updated Ubuntu 24.04
I have to switch my monitor/keyboard/mouse between two computers. Every
time when I let the screen lock time-out elapse, my desktop session
crashes and I have to log on again (but the system keeps running). As
long as the scre
Another addition to this report. It looks like something got out of
whack inside GOA, because this morning I saw in the Settings exclamation
marks against all but one of my accounts and when clicking on them,
there was a message asking to sign in in order to reconnect. Also no
mail was received and
reports the account as added even if
it cannot access the server.
Thank you again,
Serge.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gnome-online-accounts in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076192
Title:
24.04
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076192/+attachment/5803709/+files/ProcEnviron.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gnome-online-accounts in
Ubuntu.
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected
** Description changed:
Freshly installed Ubuntu 24.04, unable to add either Google or Microsoft
Personal accounts in Settings|Online Accounts. Clicking on the account
type produces a pop-up with a single 'Sign in...' button, and clicking
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076192/+attachment/5803708/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gnome-online-accou
Public bug reported:
Freshly installed Ubuntu 24.04, unable to add either Google or Microsoft
Personal accounts in Settings|Online Accounts. Clicking on the account
type produces a pop-up with a single 'Sign in...' button, and clicking
on this button just closes the pop-up for both Google and MS a
> Looking at the changelog, it appears that Serge simply pulled all
changes following 5.0.1 from git, which he likely did mistakenly looking
at the master branch rather than the stable-5.0 branch which wouldn't
have had that particular change.
That sounds like exactly what I would do.
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1729357
Title:
unprivileged user can drop supplementary groups
Public bug reported:
More and more things are requiring linking against libsystemd. In
particular, because dbus is now linked against libsystemd, anything that
wants to make a dbus client call needs it. By not shipping a static
libsystemd.a, all such users are prevented from building statically.
> FWIW This used to be the default inside the libcap build tree, but the
> problems with the container defaults (eventually fixed with
> https://github.com/moby/moby/security/advisories/GHSA-2mm7-x5h6-5pvq
Thanks for the links. For a moment I was worried that there was an
issue with containers in
** Changed in: libcap2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Serge Hallyn (serge-hallyn) => Balint Reczey (rbalint)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libcap2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1700814
Ti
The permission denied errors appear unrelated: after stopping apparmor
and restarting cups, I still get:
[932499.635684] cupsd[855122]: segfault at 0 ip 7f39be2ff98c sp
7ffc12737718 error 4 in libc.so.6[7f39be176000+195000]
[932499.635695] Code: 1e fa 89 f8 31 d2 62 a1 fd 00 ef c0 09 f0
(Forcibly downgrading to the impish packages restored ability to print.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966590
Title:
cups segfault when printing or editing
Public bug reported:
Editing a printer in localhost:631, cups keeps segfaulting after
(possibly related) access denied messages:
[932068.059601] audit: type=1400 audit(1648388571.894:566): apparmor="DENIED"
operation="connect" profile="/usr/bin/evince"
name="/run/user/1000/at-spi/bus_0" pid=853
This makes it impossible for me to print from my laptop :(
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966590
Title:
cups segfault when printing or editing printers
Stat
Ok, I did get my case to work by creating ~/ssl.conf containing:
openssl_conf = openssl_init
[openssl_init]
ssl_conf = ssl_sect
[ssl_sect]
system_default = system_default_sect
[system_default_sect]
Options = UnsafeLegacyRenegotiation
And then did OPENSSL_CONF=~/ssl.conf do-my-command
that wor
I tried also adding the following:
[openssl_init]
providers = provider_sect
ssl_conf = ssl_configuration
as I wasn't sure whether the [ssl_configuration] section would otherwise
get used for anything, but that didn't seem to make a difference.
The end of the file is
[ssl_configuration]
client =
FWIW I'm seeing this with the openconnect-sso
(https://github.com/vlaci/openconnect-sso) package on jammy. I just
tried adding the following to my /etc/ssl/openssl.cfg:
[ssl_configuration]
client = client_tls_config
[client_tls_config]
Options = UnsafeLegacyServerConnect
With no luck :(
--
Yo
FWIW this is affecting me on jammy too. I'll have to take a look at
systemd sources. Adding:
lxc.init.cmd = /sbin/init systemd.unified_cgroup_hierarchy
to my config does not help, nor does bind mounting a /proc/filesystems
without 'cgroup' (v1) in it.
--
You received this bug notification bec
This is in the debian/login.defs file, and was replaced at least before
bionic with a proper ascii ', so I'm targeting this to xenial.
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Also affects: shadow (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed
I appreciate you bringing this to our attention, but (as shadow upstream
maintainer) I'm going to join John in saying this should be wontfix.
Now if you want to change the subject to also making /etc/passwd 600,
then as Alexander points out that may be doable and have merit. But
just hiding the b
Well that's just fascinating! :)
This would be best reported at https://github.com/shadow-
maint/shadow/issues. Would you mind opening an issue there?
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
You rece
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923232
Title:
SRU of LXC 4.0.6 to focal (upstream bugfix re
** No longer affects: lxc (Ubuntu Bionic)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923232
Title:
SRU of LXC 4.0.6 to focal (upstream bugfix release)
Status in lxc pack
built in -proposed are
functional.
** Affects: lxc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Affects: lxc (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: High
Assignee: Serge Hallyn (serge-hallyn)
Status: New
** Affects: lxc (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: High
Assignee
I'm not sure 'fix released' is correct. Was a patch posted to fix it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1532314
Title:
Buffer overflow in cgmanager
Status in cg
Marking invalid as the comment in login.defs says these are handled by
pam.
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
Marking fix released for shadow based on the openssh and debian status.
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.l
** Package changed: shadow (Ubuntu) => nfs-utils (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/62152
This is not a shadow bug. It's either a bug in the graphical login
manager, or X, or a terminal driver. Please re-open if it is still
relevant.
** Package changed: shadow (Ubuntu) => lightdm (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug not
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1608026
Title:
package login 1:4.1.5.1-1ubuntu9 failed to i
On my 18.04 laptop it is group shadow and group readable.
If anyone can still reproduce this, please re-open this bug. It is
likely an intaller bug.
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
** Package changed: shadow (Ubuntu) => gnome-initial-setup (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1770233
Title:
Login package changes MIN_UID in /etc/logi
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914499
Title:
'su --help' exits with error code 2
Status i
This clearly is not related to shadow, but which package it affects
would depend on which login manager was being used. In the unlikely
event this is still an issue, please re-open this bug and let us know
which you are using.
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
Y
@cjwatson - is it safe to assume the fix was entirely in man-db? Or was
shadow supposed to do something here as well?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1482786
If this is still an issue, please re-open this bug.
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1450880
Thanks for reporting this bug. Please reply if you have some situation
where this might still occur.
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubun
Hi,
looking at the package today, control already has libaudit-dev [linux-
any] and --with-audit was dropped from rules, so I believe what you want
should already be achieved. Please re-open if that's not the case.
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You receiv
Extrausers is a concept introduced by the libnss-extrausers package.
shadow and passwd simply know nothing about it.
It simply is not a bug in the shadow package. It's a wholly un-
implemented feature. It's not clear to me how this would function -
after all these are supposed to be accounts 'copi
Same problem for me on Raspi 4 (bridged networking)
I have found a quick and dirty workaround:
In crontab:
@reboot root netplan apply
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
You should be able to manually do
fsck /dev/sda5
If the filesystem on sda5 is listed in /etc/fstab, then sixth fstab
field for that filesystem should be '2'. If it is 0, then indeed it
won't be fsck'd on reboot.
fstab is owned by util-linux, but system bringup belongs to systemd, so
I'm assigni
Please show the results of 'mount | grep sda5' and the contents of
/etc/fstab.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1817496
Title:
Login always shows partitions
Would you mind comparing this to the new version at
https://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/blob/master/po/zh_CN.po
? I looked for the 'administrator' one, and that seems fixed. Any
other updates you have which you could post as pull requests against the
upstream project would be greatly appreci
Thanks for reporting this bug. This looks to be a bug with either
xubuntu login manager or xubuntu default X11 session, so I'm reassigning
it to lightdm.
** Package changed: shadow (Ubuntu) => lightdm (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
This was a decision made by the debian package (see
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=771675 ).
Would you mind raising a bug against pam and shadow in debian bringing
this up? Perhaps the libpam-modules package should supply it alongside
the pam_securetty.so.
Please let us know if
Note this was wishlist in shadow, but i can't find wishlist in the list
of options any more.
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubu
This is actually a bug in getty, which accepts the username and then
starts login.
** Package changed: shadow (Ubuntu) => util-linux (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600653
Title:
passwd man mistake minage -m should be -n
S
Tested this in eoan - hostname had the new name.
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1759247
Title:
Tested this in eoan. New user got the SHELL=zsh which I specified in
/etc/default/useradd
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu
Not the issue anymore
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174939
Title:
[HDA-Intel - HDA Intel PCH, playback] Sound is distorted
Status in alsa-driver pac
Hi,
can I interest anyone in pushing the extrausers patch as a PR to
github.com/shadow-maint/shadow?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1840375
Title:
groupdel
Is there a workaround tip in order to re-enable lightdm in ubuntu 18.04
? I am using systemd.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1757091
Title:
systemctl enabl
Public bug reported:
On bionic, I needed to
ln -s /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdevmapper.so.1.02.1 /lib/x86_64-linux-
gnu/libdevmapper.so.1.02
in order for some previously built programs (like skopeo) to continue to
work.
** Affects: lvm2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Public bug reported:
Environment:
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=16.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=xenial
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS"
NAME="Ubuntu"
VERSION="16.04.2 LTS (Xenial Xerus)"
ID=ubuntu
ID_LIKE=debian
PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS"
VERSION_ID="16.04"
HOME_URL="http://www.ubuntu.com
Unfortunately this is really a deal-breaker for me and forces me to drop
Nautilus and experiment with other, perhaps not so well
developed/maintained, GUI file managers. What a pity.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribe
Could you find the pid of cgmanager ( 353 below) and do
Strafe -f -p 353 -o trace.txt
for maybe 5 seconds, ctrl-c it, and attach trace.txt here?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.la
@stgraber @mdeslaur - I'd considered making a release for Ubuntu... but
this is the negative acl thing... Your opinions appreciated.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Hi,
just to get this straight to narrow down scenarios to try to reproduce:
1. Dale with 16.04 you are *not* seeing this, right? You saw it with
14.04 with proposed enabled?
2. Marcelo, you are seeing this with 14.04.5 with proposed enabled?
--
You received this bug notification because you a
Assignee: (unassigned) => Serge Hallyn (serge-hallyn)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libcap2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1700814
Title:
Default capability of cap_setfcap+i should be set on setc
Sorry - if this is still an issue, please reply here.
** Changed in: libcap2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Serge Hallyn (serge-hallyn)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libcap2 in Ubuntu.
ht
This sounds acceptable to me. Issues or (even better) PRs against
github.com/shadow-maint/shadow would be great :)
Indeed the default should be the more permissible. (I won't accept
patches which require changes to the container runtime.)
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 9:13 AM, Akihiro Suda wrote:
>
Public bug reported:
After waking the machine up, I am no longer able to use the mouse as the
pointer does not respond. Only a hard reboot fixes this.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10
Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-16.19-generic 4.13.4
Uname: Linux 4
Drat. I do think this should still be pushed. I don't know when I'll
have time to do it though. Please keep it open.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cgroup-lite in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/166
I'll still aim to push this for trusty and xenial.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cgroup-lite in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1668724
Title:
fails to mount cgroupfs inside containers running on 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1409866 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1409866
The problem is in the settings of the connection, but unfortunates the
manager does not display this information.
SOLUTION:
- start nm-connection-editor from the terminal (sudo is possible, bus probably
n
Nope, tail -f is still broken at least in 4.12.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to coreutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882147
Title:
overlayfs does not implement inotify interfaces correctly
S
I've seen reports that this is fixed in 4.10?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to coreutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882147
Title:
overlayfs does not implement inotify interfaces correctly
Sta
Indeed it should be reasonable to do so. Note that there are cases,
including unprivileged containers, where file capabilities cannot be
set, so the packaging would have to gracefully handle (i.e. ignore) that
failure rather than fail the package install.
--
You received this bug notification be
@mattofak - thanks for filing the bug. I've linked it to the manpage
project. It'll get fixed.
** Also affects: ubuntu-manpage-repository
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscri
Note, the actual manpage makes no mention of the package. Which is
how it should be, as the manpage comes from upstream and not from
Ubuntu.
So if this is a bug, it is a bug against manpages.ubuntu.com.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packag
Hi,
thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This actually appears to be a problem not in libpam-cgfs itself:
Setting up libpam-cgfs (2.0.7-0ubuntu1~17.04.1) ...
Use of uninitialized value $reply in scalar chomp at
/usr/share/perl5/Debconf/FrontEnd/Passthrough.pm line 66.
I'm going to ma
Note, I'm happy to update a fix for this for a (and a -proposed one
for xenial).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libseccomp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1695808
Title:
tasks killed for nop (-1)
Public bug reported:
As the seccomp manpage points out, after seeing a SECCOMP_RET_TRACE, a
tracer can set nr to -1 to skip the syscall. Similarly, one task could
be debugging another seccomp'd task, simply doing PTRACE_SYSCALL without
using SECCOMP_PTRACE, and want to make the tracee skip a sysca
Thanks for filing, Radu.
The commit which fixed it is in this PR:
https://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/pull/72
(wget https://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/pull/72.patch)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sh
@bryanquigley - no. i had opened one for networkmanager (or planned on
it, don't remember how far i got), but in the end to provide meaningful
details i'd have to *run* it. Stop trying to get me to run it. Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch s
@bryanquigley that's an odd non-sequitur. I'm avoiding switching to
systemd (in part for power usage), and cgroupfs-mount is not the thing
being removed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-touch-meta in
Ub
I don't expect upstart to be supported, but it would be nice to keep it
in universe.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-touch-meta in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1649310
Title:
RM Upstart, ob
I'm concerned about upstart in particular. Indeed cgmanager is
unsupported. I'm using upstart with cgroupfs-mount.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-touch-meta in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
(and with that, i'll be needing a new distro :( )
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-touch-meta in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1649310
Title:
RM Upstart, obsolete, superseeded by systemd
Sta
Thanks, Nish. My thoughts:
1.a sounds good
1.b i'd like another way to do that, but not sure what a better way would
be.
1.c does lvm also fail in privileged containers? I can see no use to
running it (for now) in an unprivileged container, so the same solution
as 1.a seems reasonable.
1.d
CA
Sorry, this got lost in my inbox. I used dput. I seemed to recall that
in some recent cycle the it became either ok or preferred to use
$release-updates instead of $release-proposed in SRUs. I can trivially
change it ack to yakkety-proposed if preferred.
For Trusty, I just noticed that the non-
Thanks for looking. I'll push that tonight.
Original Message
From: Cam Cope
Sent: Monday, March 6, 2017 3:50 PM
To: serge.hal...@gmail.com
Reply To: Bug 1668724
Subject: [Bug 1668724] Re: fails to mount cgroupfs inside containers running on
16.04
LGTM
--
You received this bug notification
(s@/tmp/2@/proc/cgroups@ of course)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cgroup-lite in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1668724
Title:
fails to mount cgroupfs inside containers running on 16.04
Status in
FWIW something like:
for d in `tail -n +2 /tmp/2 | awk '{
if ($2 == 0)
print $1
else if (a[$2])
a[$2] = a[$2]","$1
else
a[$2]=$1
};END{
for(i in a) {
print a[i]
}
}'`; do
mkdir -p /sys/f
There is a bug (which is fixed in newer versions) in lxc in that it does
not ignore cgroups which are not used by the container. So in your
particular case, if you're not using the co-mounted controllers, then
indeed fixing the lxc bug should work for you as well.
Nevertheless some people will wa
This bug incidentally also affects the cgroupfs-mount package.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cgroup-lite in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1668724
Title:
fails to mount cgroupfs inside containers
(Note - this means the patch I just pushed to zesty is in fact wrong.
Since zesty requires systemd this doesn't really matter, but we must get
a working patch before pushing SRU patches)
@ccope, please let me know if you care to write an update patch.
--
You received this bug notification becaus
Hm, yes i see (hierarchy 0). I do worry that means that systems with
the unified hierarchy will be still more of a problem, since it is
mounted as hierarchy 0. But then it's probably fine to just say that
cgroup-lite doesn't support unified hierarchy.
--
You received this bug notification becau
** Also affects: cgroup-lite (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: cgroup-lite (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: cgroup-lite (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: cgroup-lit
I assume /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd was used because that's where systemd
expected to see it. I can't find any version which mounts it at
/sys/fs/cgroup/name=systemd - do you have a version that does that?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages
Thanks for the patches. Note that you've changed the loop variable from
d to c, but the loop is still using d, so nothing gets mounted with that
patch verbatim. Switching the variable back to d fixes the issue for
me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touc
** Changed in: cgroup-lite (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: cgroup-lite (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cgroup-lite in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
Seems like just adding
ConditionVirtualization=!container
to debian//open-iscsi.service should fix it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1576341
Title:
fails i
1 - 100 of 735 matches
Mail list logo
