[Touch-packages] [Bug 2073933] Please test proposed package

2024-11-14 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Benjamin, or anyone else affected, Accepted apport into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/2.28.1-0ubuntu3.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https:/

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1537310] Re: Canceling upload of problem information causes dialog to freeze

2024-11-14 Thread Robie Basak
I've reviewed the changes from 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.2 to 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.3 and they're fine from an SRU perspective since they only tweak the dep8 test. I see that the upload of 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.3 uses -v as expected, so I'm accepting it to squash into the in-flight SRU without re-review of what's alread

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1537310] Please test proposed package

2024-11-14 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Karl-Philipp, or anyone else affected, Accepted apport into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/2.28.1-0ubuntu3.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See htt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2073935] Please test proposed package

2024-11-14 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Benjamin, or anyone else affected, Accepted apport into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/2.28.1-0ubuntu3.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https:/

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2076186] Please test proposed package

2024-11-14 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Chris, or anyone else affected, Accepted apport into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/2.28.1-0ubuntu3.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2078695] Please test proposed package

2024-11-14 Thread Robie Basak
Hello errors.ubuntu.com, or anyone else affected, Accepted apport into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/2.28.1-0ubuntu3.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. Se

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2078634] Please test proposed package

2024-11-14 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Jānis, or anyone else affected, Accepted apport into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/2.28.1-0ubuntu3.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2078851] Proposed package upload rejected

2024-11-13 Thread Robie Basak
An upload of cyrus-sasl2 to noble-proposed has been rejected from the upload queue for the following reason: "See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus- sasl2/+bug/2078851/comments/16". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1980991] Re: /usr/sbin/on_ac_power incorrectly reporting ac power status

2024-10-04 Thread Robie Basak
> 1. > There are spurious development artifacts being added > I have looked through the debdiffs and couldn't find such, are you referring to the "Maintainer" and "XSBC-Original-Maintainer" section maybe? Not the debdiffs, the actual upload. For example, from the Rejected queue, http://launchpadl

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2082072] Re: No support for Pi 2712D0 stepping

2024-10-02 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Dave, or anyone else affected, Accepted mesa into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/24.0.9-0ubuntu0.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ub

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2077576] Re: SSH client doesn't handle properly non-ASCII chars

2024-10-02 Thread Robie Basak
Leaving my draft here both so you can read it and so I don't lose it: > Indeed, the reason for this is that in authd we are presenting a qrcode to perform weblogin and that doesn't work. This seems a reasonable justification for an SRU in principle then, now that it's documented. Thank you for th

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2082072] Re: [SRU] Mesa bump to 24.2 required for Pi 2712D0 stepping

2024-10-02 Thread Robie Basak
The final upload to Noble unapproved cherry-picks the required fixes rather than bumping to 24.2, right? So this bug is presumably better described for the actual problem being solved rather than one presumed solution that is no longer the plan? ** Summary changed: - [SRU] Mesa bump to 24.2 requi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2078851] Re: saslauthd wrong permission of /var/spool/postfix/var/run/saslauthd

2024-10-02 Thread Robie Basak
SRU review 1. Is this bug that saslauthd doesn't work in Noble at all because the permissions are wrong? Or only in certain circumstances, and in which case, which ones? 2. Is it possible that somebody is successfully using saslauthd running as root, and changing the group of the service to sasl

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2003266] Please test proposed package

2024-10-02 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Ian, or anyone else affected, Accepted neon27 into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/neon27/0.32.2-1ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2003266] Re: 22.04 package lacks GSSAPI support

2024-10-02 Thread Robie Basak
Thank you for contributing the fix for this! The changes look good to me and I'll accept these into jammy-proposed shortly. I would like a couple of things thought about with regard to testing though please: 1) It's a hard requirement that a test be performed to ensure that the package still wor

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2081334] Re: further performance improvement for dracut-install 060

2024-09-23 Thread Robie Basak
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-noble ** Tags added: verification-failed verification-failed-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2080940] Re: unattended-upgrades broken by python-upgrade

2024-09-17 Thread Robie Basak
Looking at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3.10/3.10.12-1~22.04.6, it sounds like this was caused by a security update? ** Information type changed from Public to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is s

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2078356] Re: python3 preinst failure to run pre-rtupdate hooks

2024-09-12 Thread Robie Basak
Nice find! So that's *a* bug, but is it *this* bug? @mcecs do you have $errors set in your environment? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078356 Tit

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2077741] Re: No default background set for GNOME-Greeter

2024-09-04 Thread Robie Basak
Accepting. I see that the change is scoped to "[org.gnome.desktop.background:GNOME-Greeter]" so I guess there's low likelyhood of impact outside that, but for testing, to what extent do we need to consider other flavours that use gnome-greeter? ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-neede

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2077741] Please test proposed package

2024-09-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Matthew, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-settings into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu- settings/24.04.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2077576] Re: SSH client doesn't handle properly non-ASCII chars

2024-09-04 Thread Robie Basak
This seems like quite an invasive change. It has not yet been accepted upstream. It touches PAM, and it looks to me like it might affect behaviour before authentication is complete. It affects escaping. Injection of malicious data into a stream to be parsed by the terminal has security implications

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1980991] Re: /usr/sbin/on_ac_power incorrectly reporting ac power status

2024-09-04 Thread Robie Basak
Thank you for working on this! SRU review > Currently there is an issue with the ac_on_power script where it thinks that USB-c ports with devices plugged in to them are plugged in to power. This isn't a statement of user impact, making it difficult to understand how changing the stable releases

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2003027] Re: fq_codel qdisc compiled but not enabled on 22.10

2024-08-28 Thread Robie Basak
** Tags added: regression-release -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2003027 Title: fq_codel qdisc compiled but not enabled on 22.10 Status in Ubuntu: Fix Re

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2003027] Re: fq_codel qdisc compiled but not enabled on 22.10

2024-08-28 Thread Robie Basak
This missed making it into 24.04.1, but it'd be nice to get this released immediately after the images for 24.04.1 are finalised, so that users get the new behaviour from day one of using 24.04.1. I asked about this in #ubuntu-release. It'd be a great help if this could be SRU- verified *immediatel

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2003027] Re: fq_codel qdisc compiled but not enabled on 22.10

2024-08-28 Thread Robie Basak
Accepting for 24.04. It is unfortunate to have to change behaviour in this way, but this seems preferable than to switch to the reported-worse qdisc just for 24.04, and also preferable to do sooner rather than later in 24.04's lifetime, given that the .1 release is due this week. However, if this

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2003027] Please test proposed package

2024-08-28 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Dave, or anyone else affected, Accepted procps into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/2:4.0.4-4ubuntu3.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2078101] [NEW] No dep8 tests for Ubuntu-specific default sysctl.d changes

2024-08-28 Thread Robie Basak
Public bug reported: In bug 2003027, Ubuntu's procps regressed the default qdisc from fq_codel to pfifo_fast. Given that this was considered important enough to justify changing behaviour in a stable release, we should have an autopkgtest that verifies our intended delta against upstream, but we d

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2073742] Re: [SRU] Enable support for Dalmation Cloud Archive

2024-08-15 Thread Robie Basak
Hello James, or anyone else affected, Accepted software-properties into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software- properties/0.99.49.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new packa

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2069433] Please test proposed package

2024-08-15 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected, Accepted software-properties into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software- properties/0.99.49.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new pack

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2069433] Re: Enabling new pockets does not enable deb-src for them, even if source code is enabled

2024-08-15 Thread Robie Basak
Accepting, but my request to amend the Test Plan from comment 2 still stands, and needs adjusting (and SRU verification accordingly) prior to SRU release. ** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-n

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2061214] Re: [SRU] Software Sources is not compatible with deb822

2024-08-15 Thread Robie Basak
Actually, no need to actually release, since it's identical to the special binary package, right? So I can just accept the next SRU for this package into noble-proposed and treat this bug as completed. When that SRU lands, this no-binary-change one will, too. -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2061214] Re: [SRU] Software Sources is not compatible with deb822

2024-08-15 Thread Robie Basak
OK I'm releasing this on the basis of Julian's justification above. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061214 Title: [SRU] Software Sources is not

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2073742] Re: [SRU] Enable support for Dalmation Cloud Archive

2024-08-14 Thread Robie Basak
This is missing the previous changelog entry, but also should just be squashed together. I pinged juliank and jamespage in #ubuntu-devel. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu. https://b

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2069433] Re: Enabling new pockets does not enable deb-src for them, even if source code is enabled

2024-08-14 Thread Robie Basak
This is missing the previous changelog entry, but also should just be squashed together. I pinged juliank and jamespage in #ubuntu-devel. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu. https://b

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2073742] Re: [SRU] Enable support for Dalmation Cloud Archive

2024-08-14 Thread Robie Basak
I see the Test Plan has been copied over from previous bugs. I think we should also test that apt seems the cloud archive correctly. That was already being done, so I'll just add to the Test Plan what was actually being already done. ** Description changed: Please add support for: -cloud

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2060721] Re: APT 2.8.0: Promote weak key warnings to errors

2024-08-14 Thread Robie Basak
I discussed the plan for noble-updates and for 24.04.1 with Julian in detail yesterday. I think the plan is likely to be accepted by the SRU team. We're behind with the documentation, but I'm accepting the newest upload to noble-proposed now since time is tight. Julian will make sure that the full

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2060721] Please test proposed package

2024-08-14 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected, Accepted apt into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.8.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Tes

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2073126] Please test proposed package

2024-08-14 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected, Accepted apt into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.8.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Tes

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2064656] Re: gnome-shell spams the journal with `Failed to parse translated string '„24h“' for key 'clock-format' in schema 'org.gnome.desktop.interface': 0:expected value` multi

2024-08-07 Thread Robie Basak
From #ubuntu-release, Jeremy suggested that this needs doing before the language packs are generated for 24.04.1. ** Changed in: gsettings-desktop-schemas (Ubuntu Noble) Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.04.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded pa

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2075337] Re: py3clean fails when using alternate character set

2024-08-07 Thread Robie Basak
** Also affects: python3-defaults (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: dh-python (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed t

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2059734] Re: Tar fails to extract archives that include folders with certain permissions on armhf

2024-08-07 Thread Robie Basak
Ghadi is working on a replacement upload, so I'm rejecting the current one as agreed with him. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tar in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059734 Title: Tar fails to extra

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2075337] Re: py3clean fails when using alternate character set

2024-08-06 Thread Robie Basak
Thanks all for working on this! Do we know if releases prior to Noble are affected? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dh-python in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075337 Title: py3clean fails when us

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2075337] Re: py3clean fails when using alternate character set

2024-08-05 Thread Robie Basak
I think it's fair to call this Critical since SRU releases generally are currently blocked by this. Looking at the definition, "Severely affects applications beyond the package responsible for the root cause" also applies. ** Changed in: python3-defaults (Ubuntu) Importance: High => Critical -

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2075337] Re: py3clean fails when using alternate character set

2024-08-05 Thread Robie Basak
Setting C.UTF-8 would work internally I agree. But what does this mean for SRUs? Does every affected SRU now have to declare Breaks: python3-minimal (<< whatever)? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaul

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2075337] Re: py3clean fails when using alternate character set

2024-08-05 Thread Robie Basak
Here's the buggy code that assumes UTF-8: https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3-defaults/tree/debpython/files.py#n54 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpa

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2075337] Re: py3clean fails when using alternate character set

2024-08-05 Thread Robie Basak
Any suggestions on how to identify SRUs that are affected so that we can ensure that the necessary Breaks are in there? (also, do we know that Breaks will work as needed for an issue in the prerm?) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, wh

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2061825] Re: [SRU] ucf fails to work for local diversions on Jammy

2024-05-01 Thread Robie Basak
I wondered if ucf is expected to handle dpkg-divert -ed files in the first place, since that seemed odd to me. It does seem like that's a feature the code was intended to support, although it's unclear to me if it ever worked, and it's not really documented anywhere I can find except that is implie

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2061825] Re: [SRU] ucf fails to work for local diversions on Jammy

2024-05-01 Thread Robie Basak
> * run update-maintainer script FWIW, it's not necessary to mention this directly. It is correct to do it, but convention is to skip mentioning it in the changelog because otherwise we'd have to unnecessarily mention it on nearly every Ubuntu upload. -- You received this bug notification becaus

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2053146] Update Released

2024-04-17 Thread Robie Basak
The verification of the Stable Release Update for openssh has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2053146] Re: openssh 8.9p1 for Jammy auth2-gss patch for gssapi-keyex method is slightly wrong

2024-04-17 Thread Robie Basak
It's not clear to me if a simple "ssh -Snone localhost" is covered by the autopkgtests, so I did that manually, testing without -proposed first, and ensuring to run "sudo systemctl restart ssh" after upgrading to -proposed to ensure that I'm definitely hitting the daemon from -proposed. Success on

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1747499] Re: 98-reboot-required and Interaction with livepatch

2024-04-16 Thread Robie Basak
** Tags added: reboot-required -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1747499 Title: 98-reboot-required and Interaction with livepatch Status in unatt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2017401] Re: Unexpected / unwanted unattended-upgrades behaviour after kernel upgrade when Livepatch enabled

2024-04-16 Thread Robie Basak
** Tags added: reboot-required -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2017401 Title: Unexpected / unwanted unattended-upgrades behaviour after kernel

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2055776] Re: After updating ubuntu, the network to which the subnet address is assigned does not become active in KVM.

2024-04-03 Thread Robie Basak
** Tags added: regression-update -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055776 Title: After updating ubuntu, the network to which the subnet address is assigned

[Touch-packages] [Bug 878333] Re: ifconfig not showing virtual ip addresses

2024-04-02 Thread Robie Basak
This sounds like exactly the behaviour that I explained in 2013 here: https://askubuntu.com/a/332421/7808 ifconfig still exists but is deprecated and no longer shipped by default. Users should use its replacement "ip" instead. However it is true that ifconfig does not display the additional alias

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2059859] Re: pam_env(sshd:session): deprecated reading of user environment enabled

2024-04-02 Thread Robie Basak
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Tags added: server-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. h

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2053146] Re: openssh 8.9p1 for Jammy auth2-gss patch for gssapi-keyex method is slightly wrong

2024-02-19 Thread Robie Basak
I'm flagging this as Critical. It sounds like everyone agrees that the distro patch we're carrying is bad. I think it's possible that it's bad in quite a serious way, so we should investigate immediately without delay until we've understood the severity of this, especially because by carrying the d

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1995790] Please test proposed package

2024-02-15 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Mekaniserad, or anyone else affected, Accepted apt into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.4.12 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.c

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1995790] Re: regression: ?garbage does not work correctly in install commands

2024-02-15 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Mekaniserad, or anyone else affected, Accepted apt into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.7.3ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051181] Re: apt cannot upgrade phased updates if the current security version is same as updates

2024-02-15 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Andy, or anyone else affected, Accepted apt into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.7.3ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051181] Please test proposed package

2024-02-15 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Andy, or anyone else affected, Accepted apt into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.4.12 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Test

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2047450] Re: tail emits no output for sysfs files when using large page kernels

2024-02-07 Thread Robie Basak
I'm retrying these failing autopkgtests with migration-reference/0 since if they fail anyway they shouldn't hold things up. In the meantime, could you please also verify that behaviour on 4K page size hasn't regressed? It looks like this was implied in the Test Plan but hasn't been verified. Thank

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2042587] Update Released

2024-01-31 Thread Robie Basak
The verification of the Stable Release Update for dnsmasq has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045570] Update Released

2024-01-31 Thread Robie Basak
The verification of the Stable Release Update for dnsmasq has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2049318] Re: [SRU] free(): double free detected in tcache 2

2024-01-31 Thread Robie Basak
Thank you for preparing the SRU and for testing! The Test Plan agreed in the bug description included two cases but it looks like you only did the first one? Given that a different SRU team member did the review and agreed the fully stated plan, I don't feel that I'm in a position to then release

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2015562] Re: [SRU] Segfault in dnsmasq when using certain static domain entries + DoH (bugfix possibly exists upstream)

2024-01-03 Thread Robie Basak
"Where problems could occur" says "...in [Other Info] section I included some query examples for well-known domains, so we can be more confident with this change", but I don't see these carried out as part of the SRU verification. Admittedly they weren't documented as part of the Test Plan, but if

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045931] Re: ps3 sixasis controller request pin to connect to bt

2023-12-13 Thread Robie Basak
Thank you for the clarification! I'll remove the regression-update tag then, since this is the intended behaviour of the security update, so it shouldn't count towards regression statistics. ** Tags removed: regression-update -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039104] Please test proposed package

2023-12-13 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Steve, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-settings into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu- settings/23.10.5.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. Se

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039104] Re: ubuntu-settings must drop ubuntu-raspi-settings* from debian/control

2023-12-13 Thread Robie Basak
> It is unlikely but possible that the removal of the raspi binary package from this source package will have inadvertently modified the contents of the other remaining binary packages. It might be worth running a binary debdiff for SRU verification then, against the binary packages built in propo

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045768] Re: Proposal to Assign a Fixed Group ID to the render Group

2023-12-12 Thread Robie Basak
** Also affects: base-passwd (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058500 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-passwd in Ubuntu. https:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045768] Re: Proposal to Assign a Fixed Group ID to the render Group

2023-12-12 Thread Robie Basak
I don't have time to provide a fully researched answer, but I hope this will help. If you're not already familiar, I suggest you start at https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#users-and- groups. Ubuntu cannot allocate these without potential future collision with Debian. So you

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045931] Re: ps3 sixasis controller request pin to connect to bt

2023-12-11 Thread Robie Basak
Looks like this is a reported regression in the security pocket. ** Information type changed from Public to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045931] Re: ps3 sixasis controller request pin to connect to bt

2023-12-11 Thread Robie Basak
Reopening because a PIN of is not reported to work (and even if it did, that would still be a regression in a stable release). ** Changed in: bluez (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed ** Changed in: bluez (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical -- You received this bug no

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2025339] Re: FDE image fails to run e2fsck

2023-11-15 Thread Robie Basak
Further to a conversation in #ubuntu-devel I'm setting the Lunar task to Won't Fix. Further details: https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2023/11/15/%23ubuntu-devel.html ** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu Lunar) Status: In Progress => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2025339] Re: FDE image fails to run e2fsck

2023-11-03 Thread Robie Basak
Also, given that this is the second time this kind of thing has happened, perhaps it is appropriate to add a dep8 test to ensure that the compatibility "level" of the default has not regressed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2025339] Re: FDE image fails to run e2fsck

2023-11-03 Thread Robie Basak
(in the development release) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to e2fsprogs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2025339 Title: FDE image fails to run e2fsck Status in e2fsprogs package in Ubuntu: Fix Re

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2025339] Re: FDE image fails to run e2fsck

2023-11-03 Thread Robie Basak
> So if we disable this by default, I think it should only impact performances of generated filesystems and probably not break anything else. This sounds like it could be insignificant, or a major performance regression in some use cases. It's not clear which. Presumably orphan_file was introduced

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2029473] Re: Backport Ubuntu Pro to Xenial

2023-10-25 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Nathan, or anyone else affected, Accepted software-properties into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/0.96.20.11 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new pac

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2029473] Re: Backport Ubuntu Pro to Xenial

2023-10-25 Thread Robie Basak
Note related bug 2029089 that needs releasing at the same time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2029473 Title: Backport Ubuntu Pro to Xenial St

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039873] Re: liblxc-dev was built with LXC_DEVEL=1 in Ubuntu Jammy/Kinetic

2023-10-23 Thread Robie Basak
OK, thanks all! In that case, Aleksandr (or someone) please could you start by preparing a debdiff for noble to fix the issue there and add an appropriate autopkgtest as Stéphane recommends? While noble isn't open the SRU isn't strictly blocked on this, but we should at least have the upload ready

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039873] Re: liblxc-dev was built with LXC_DEVEL=1 in Ubuntu Jammy/Kinetic

2023-10-23 Thread Robie Basak
Sorry, I just hit send on a reply by accident on a reply before I was ready - I intended to postpone it instead. I need to go now but I will get back to this later and fix my reply. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 2039873] Re: liblxc-dev was built with LXC_DEVEL=1 in Ubuntu Jammy/Kinetic

2023-10-23 Thread Robie Basak
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 04:27:16PM -, Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn wrote: > >Has this been fixed in the development release, and if so, how? > > LXC_DEVEL is 1 in the development release: > https://github.com/lxc/lxc/blob/main/meson.build#L36 > > But LXC_DEVEL is 0 in *any* stable tag: > https://git

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039873] Re: liblxc-dev was built with LXC_DEVEL=1 in Ubuntu Jammy/Kinetic

2023-10-23 Thread Robie Basak
Thank you for working on this. Has this been fixed in the development release, and if so, how? It's not clear to me that making this change is the appropriate thing to do in an SRU. How is LXC_DEVEL used in practice? Have you analysed known reverse dependencies to understand the impact of making

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2035061] Re: uptime -p reports incorrect output after 52 weeks

2023-09-18 Thread Robie Basak
Could we have a justification for why this is important for SRU, please? As written, the Impact statement describes a bug, but doesn't present any explanation of why it is important for Ubuntu to fix it in its stable releases. If it is just that the output might be wrong and we'd like it to be corr

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2035061] Re: uptime -p reports incorrect output after 52 weeks

2023-09-18 Thread Robie Basak
(unsubscribing ~ubuntu-sponsors as given my previous comment there is now nothing remaining to sponsor) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2035061 Title: uptime

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2036358] Re: systemd wait-online now times out after jammy and lunar upgrade

2023-09-17 Thread Robie Basak
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Nick Rosbrook (enr0n) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. http

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2028810] Re: rsync 3.1.3 performance regression

2023-09-07 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Ye, or anyone else affected, Accepted rsync into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsync/3.1.3-8ubuntu0.7 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2018060] Re: Merge bridge-utils from Debian unstable for mantic

2023-08-30 Thread Robie Basak
** Changed in: bridge-utils (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bridge-utils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2018060 Title: Merge bridge-utils from Debian

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2018079] Re: Merge libmnl from Debian unstable for mantic

2023-08-30 Thread Robie Basak
** Changed in: libmnl (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libmnl in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2018079 Title: Merge libmnl from Debian unstable for mant

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2018081] Re: Merge libseccomp from Debian unstable for mantic

2023-08-30 Thread Robie Basak
** Changed in: libseccomp (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libseccomp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2018081 Title: Merge libseccomp from Debian unsta

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2028879] [NEW] Lack of default dpkg diverts causes autopkgtest failure

2023-07-27 Thread Robie Basak
Public bug reported: tests/integration/test_packaging_apt_dpkg.py::test_get_file_package_diversion fails if it doesn't detect any dpkg diversions. Apparently something (possibly dash?) stopped diverting something, so now there are no diversions in the autopkgtest environment and therefore this tes

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2028881] [NEW] apport FTBFS

2023-07-27 Thread Robie Basak
Public bug reported: Rebuilding apport in mantic today FTBFS because of a pylint complaint. We discussed this in #ubuntu-devel today. I don't think that failing the build on a lint failure is appropriate in distribution packaging in a production build since otherwise the build regresses for no goo

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2017401] Re: Unexpected / unwanted unattended-upgrades behaviour after kernel upgrade when Livepatch enabled

2023-07-27 Thread Robie Basak
** Tags added: server-triage-discuss -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2017401 Title: Unexpected / unwanted unattended-upgrades behaviour after ke

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2027079] Update Released

2023-07-26 Thread Robie Basak
The verification of the Stable Release Update for openldap has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2004551] Re: upgrade to lunar fails due to rescue-ssh.target or port 22 takeover

2023-07-21 Thread Robie Basak
Miriam, if you could preserve the state of the system please if you still have it for debugging, then that would be helpful. ** Tags added: server-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2028170] Re: curl 7.81.0-1ubuntu1.11 fails verifying proper ssl cert w/ subj-alt-name

2023-07-20 Thread Robie Basak
** Tags added: regression-update -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to curl in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028170 Title: curl 7.81.0-1ubuntu1.11 fails verifying proper ssl cert w/ subj-alt- name St

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2015645] Re: ufw crashes in wsl2

2023-07-19 Thread Robie Basak
> Users have talked about upgrading via the command line to 22.10, but I figured that Lunar was about to EOL You mean Kinetic? Lunar has a while left to go. Does that mean that users can upgrade from 22.04 to 23.04 still? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu T

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2015645] Re: ufw crashes in wsl2

2023-07-19 Thread Robie Basak
It doesn't look like this is fixed in the current stable release (Lunar) and I don't see an SRU upload for this either. What are your plans for Lunar? Please see: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Newer_Releases If Lunar isn't relevant for WSL and therefore nobody could hit the bug ther

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2020913] Re: /etc/profile.d/debuginfd.{sh, csh} are created with 600 permissions

2023-07-12 Thread Robie Basak
I discussed this with Sergio elsewhere and we concluded that we don't want to change behaviour in Jammy to opt users in to start automatically reaching debuginfod.ubuntu.com without further discussion. So for this bug, we'll consider the issue to be simply that if the user configures a server in /e

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2020913] Re: /etc/profile.d/debuginfd.{sh, csh} are created with 600 permissions

2023-07-07 Thread Robie Basak
> This results in DEBUGINFOD_URLS not being set for non-root users. Should the Test Plan not then check that DEBUGINFOD_URLS is actually set correctly, and that debuginfod functionality actually works? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2019856] Re: Add missing ARM-cores to support Grace-based systems

2023-06-21 Thread Robie Basak
I was about to ask *why* Ubuntu users need this change before I read Steve's comment. It might be helpful to expand on that, because without a full explanation, we (SRU team) are only really _speculating_ on the actual user impact. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >