[Touch-packages] [Bug 1641303] Re: Wish: apt shouldn't show kept-back packages within the list of upgradable

Note (tiny mistake in previous comment): - - 'apt list --kept-back' to show packages on hold (= 'apt-mark showhold'); + - 'apt list --kept-back' to show packages on hold that can be manually upgraded (⊆ 'apt-mark showhold'); (The fact that the package is on hold, per se doesn't necessary mean tha

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1641303] Re: Wish: apt shouldn't show kept-back packages within the list of upgradable

Sorry, it should be 'Thus' (a.k.a 'Therefore') instead of 'This' in the last sentence. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641303 Title: Wish: apt shouldn't show k

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1641303] Re: Wish: apt shouldn't show kept-back packages within the list of upgradable

Note (tiny mistake in previous comment): - - 'apt list --kept-back' to show packages on hold (= 'apt-mark showhold'); + - 'apt list --kept-back' to show packages on hold that can be manually upgraded (⊆ 'apt-mark showhold'); (The fact that the package is on hold, per se doesn't necessary mean t

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1641303] Re: Wish: apt shouldn't show kept-back packages within the list of upgradable

IMHO: 'apt list' should have at least 2 keys: - 'apt list --upgradable' to show packages that will be upgraded; - 'apt list --kept-back' to show packages on hold (= 'apt-mark showhold'); - 'apt list --upgradable --kept-back' to show both (i.e. union). And 'apt update' should report only '--upg

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1641303] [NEW] Wish: apt shouldn't show kept-back packages within the list of upgradable

Public bug reported: Should apt consider kept-back packages as upgradable? Current state is: 1. Within 'apt dist-upgrade' it doesn't. 2. Within 'apt list --upgradable' and 'apt update' it does. For example: $ sudo apt update > [...] > Fetched 94,5 kB in 1s (66,0 kB/s) > Reading package lists...

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1640457] Re: Xorg assert failure: Xorg: ../../nouveau/pushbuf.c:238: pushbuf_krel: Assertion `bkref' failed.

apt-cache policy libdrm-nouveau2 libdrm-nouveau2: Installed: 2.4.67-1ubuntu0.16.04.2 Candidate: 2.4.67-1ubuntu0.16.04.2 Version table: *** 2.4.67-1ubuntu0.16.04.2 500 500 http://ua.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.4

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1631631] [NEW] Trivial bug in man documentation: forgotten --strip-unneeded option in objcopy SYNOPSIS

Public bug reported: In the man page of "objcopy" the "--strip-unneeded" option: - is described in OPTIONS section; - but is forgotten in SYNOPSIS section (don't confuse with "--strip-unneeded-symbol=" and "--strip-unneeded-symbols=", which aren't forgotten). $ lsb_release -rd Description:U