Can there only ever be a single gateway4 or gateway6 be defined in
initramfs-tools?
What happens if both $gateway4 and $gateway6 are defined? I think we'd need to
define two actual default routes below the "routes" stanza, e.g.:
network:
version: 2
ethernets:
enp5s0:
addresses:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2065870 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065870
This has been due to not matching on the permanent MAC address,
therefore the virtual MAC address of vlans would match the ethernet
configuration and apply the IP address.
See bug 2065870
Fixed as of 1.1.1
Thanks for confirming that using systemd-resolved fixes your issue.
With the Ubuntu 24.04 (Noble) LTS release, resolvconf got dropped from
Ubuntu, so you'd need to use the supported systemd-resolved anyway going
forward.
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix
--
Thanks for confirming that this is now working for you!
There was a time when the 22.04 -> 24.04 upgrade did not properly
install the systemd-resolved package (LP: #2054761), maybe you got hit
by that issue. So I'm flagging this as a systemd[-resolved] upgrade
issue.
But I cannot seem to reproduc
Another workaround for ubuntu-settings package would be to mark the
/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml file as a "conffile", e.g. in
debian/ubuntu-settings.conffiles
This way modifications would be ignored by debsums. But it might have
side-effects of asking the user on upgrade to accept/rej
I am unable to reproduce the issue with a multipass "mpqemubr0"
interface, as described in the bug description. It just modifies the
"ipv4.ignore-auto-routes" setting correctly for me in a clean Jammy LXD
container. So I suppose there might be something else on @RO1's system
that causes side effect
ciOAYEEOgZuev6e/fxLpojXxsiZsJPzn1Jk8LaYvVg',
'lukas.maerd...@canonical.com', '(RSA)']
2025-01-07 09:38:45,613 INFO [1] SSH keys [Authorized]
### From the host (pubkey login OK):
$ ssh -i ~/.ssh/canonical_id_rsa test@10.238.94.46
Enter passphrase for key '/home/l
Autopkgtests are looking good for openssh 1:9.7p1-7ubuntu4.1 from
oracular-proposed. The intermittent failures from comment #13 have all
been resolved.
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-oracular/oracular/amd64/o/openssh/20241218_102717_96d50@/log.gz
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/
Exactly, this directory and file needs to be created locally to
implement/try the workaround.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083129
Title:
[Lenovo
Resetting to "New" as we have 2.5.5-2 in Debian now.
** Changed in: libseccomp (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libseccomp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/20852
Hi, thanks for investigating this issue!
Indeed, it seems to be unrelated to samba and is an systemd[-resolved]
issue.
Your /etc/resolv.conf looks odd, did you manually modify that file, or
install the "resolvconf" package to have it handle this file for you?
Both cases do not reflect the default
The fix migrated in Plucky, according to comment #60, but it was also
accepted in Debian as 2.90-7, so I'm syncing it from Debian. Leaving the
remaining SRU work to Miriam.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsma
The ipv4.route-metric bug has been handled in LP: #2076172 and is
included in Netplan v1.1 which is currently pending in noble-proposed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.l
The netplan.io 0.107 autopkgtest are now also back to green, especially
when run with those triggers:
netplan.io/0.107.1-3ubuntu0.22.04.2 – upgrade to 0.107 to provide any veth tests
systemd/249.11-0ubuntu3.14 – for tunneling fixes from bug 2037667
network-manager/1.36.6-0ubuntu2.1 – for veth fixe
I tested network-manager 1.36.6-0ubuntu2.1 from jammy-proposed and can
confirm things are working as expected.
root@j:~# apt -t jammy-proposed install network-manager
root@j:~# netplan set --origin-hint=50-cloud-init
network.renderer=NetworkManager
root@j:~# netplan apply
WARNING:root:Cannot call
See investigation in
https://code.launchpad.net/~slyon/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+git/openssh/+merge/478452
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2091943
Title:
Open
Public bug reported:
Starting with Noble, the openssh autopkgtest "regress" (specifically
"integrity.sh") fails when the version string contains a tilde
character, such as "~ppa1".
In such case, it would fail with a log like this:
"""
943s 15:17:52.628196592 O: aes128-...@openssh.com: expected 10
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu Oracular)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touc
enr0n says:
"Please leave noble alone for now. @ahasenack and I have been monitoring the
regression report and hoping for more feedback, but we still need to decide how
to move forward. In any case, that won't be solved before EOY."
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => Tri
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028282
Title:
[SRU] SSH pubkey authetication fai
Uploaded into Oracular for SRU review.
Holding back the upload to Noble (and Jammy), for now, due to a pending
SRU regression in 1:9.6p1-3ubuntu13.7. I don't want this to get
entangled. Maybe we should bundle it on top, though?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu Jammy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028282
Title:
[SRU] SSH pub
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu Noble)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028282
Title:
[SRU] SSH pub
0731)
SourcePackage: openssh
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2023-07-20 (0 days ago)
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu Oracular)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscri
** Summary changed:
- SSH pubkey authetication fails when GSSAPI enabled
+ [SRU] SSH pubkey authetication fails when GSSAPI enabled
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
The Plucky autopkgtest logs from
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/openssh already show:
"""
## Checking ssh logs to confirm publickey auth was used
Dec 14 22:44:16 sshd-gssapi.example.fake sshd-session[2213]: Accepted publickey
for testuser2020-2 from 127.0.0.1 port 43364 ssh2: ED25519
SH
A reproducer for this got codified as of 1:9.9p1-2 (thanks to Colin
Watson). It's therefore included in Plucky and can be easily reproduced
on Oracular.
To reproduce, we can use the attached "dep8-verifier.diff" to add
corresponding autopkgtest improvements to Oracular, which is then
showing the v
** Also affects: openssh (Ubuntu Plucky)
Importance: High
Status: Triaged
** Also affects: openssh (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: openssh (Ubuntu Oracular)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: openssh (Ubuntu Jammy)
This is now pending SRU review:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=network-
manager
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu Jammy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2032824
Ti
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
- * Network Manager 1.36 has a bug that prevents it to activate veth pairs.
- * The problem was found in the Netplan's CI with the new support for veths
in Netplan v0.107.
+ * Network Manager 1.36 has a bug that prevents it to activate veth pairs.
+ * T
** Also affects: network-manager (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed t
Looking into the attached sosreport, I can see
"/etc/netplan/00-installer-config (copy).yaml" in addition to
"/etc/netplan700-installer-config.yaml". What's the matter of that
"(copy)" file? Is it needed?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packag
Could you try putting a systemd override for NetworkManager.service,
delaying its startup a little bit, to see if that helps to mitigate the
race condition?
E.g.:
$ cat /etc/systemd/system/NetworkManager.service.d/override.conf
[Service]
ExecStartPre=/usr/bin/sleep 3
--
You received this bug no
Thanks for the additional logs, those are very curious..
"""
Sep 5 05:55:40 MonacoSIT4 NetworkManager[3448]: [1725530140.8548]
keyfile: load:
"/run/NetworkManager/system-connections/netplan-ens5f1np1.nmconnection": failed
to load connection: cannot access file: No such file or directory
"""
"
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089930
Ti
** Changed in: gobject-introspection (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gobject-introspection in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080965
Title:
[MIR] architecture-
I've discussed this more with the Foundations team. Even though being a
development package this seems to be valuable in general, not just as a
libglib2.0-dev dependency.
So let's get it promoted, instead of "Extra-Exclude" all the long-tail
of libglib2.0-dev.
I've subscribed ~foundations-bugs, a
** Summary changed:
- wifi setting causes networkmanager crash
+ wifi setting causes networkmanager crash, due to macaddress: "stable-ssid
** Summary changed:
- wifi setting causes networkmanager crash, due to macaddress: "stable-ssid
+ wifi setting causes networkmanager crash, due to macaddress
src/core/settings/nm-settings-utils.c:103 is a nm_assert_not_reached()
in function "nm_sett_util_storages_add_take()"?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
autopkgtest tests fixed by retry
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2084731
Title:
Not report 6 GHz capability correctly
Status in OEM Priority Projec
After a fresh Ubuntu 22.04.5 Desktop default installation, I changed the
apt sources to Noble, incl. apt-pinning for noble-proposed and executed
a "sudo apt dist-upgrade", that included the upgrade to network-
manager/noble-proposed 1.46.0-1ubuntu2.2.
lukas@lukas-Standard-PC-Q35-ICH9-2
I've tested network-manager 1.46.0-1ubuntu2.2 from noble-proposed and
can confirm the Jammy -> Noble upgrade is working as intended.
I re-triggered a bunch of the tmpfail (/unknown) autopkgtest from above.
$ lxc launch ubuntu-daily:jammy jj-nm-np
Creating jj-nm-np
Starting jj-nm-np
** Changed in: gobject-introspection (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gobject-introspection in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080
** Tags added: update-excuse
** Also affects: gobject-introspection (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gobject-introspection in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
IIUC the problem is the package split of sd-resolved, which was still
part of the combined "systemd" binary package in Jammy. When people
upgrade to Noble "systemd" gets unconfigured, dropping any cache/state
about systemd-resolved.service, then the "systemd-resolved" binary
package gets (force)ins
see also bug #2083893
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-settings in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078759
Title:
Ability to use comments in YAML generated by Netplan
Status in OEM Priority Pr
To be backported to Noble via LP: #2077011
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2084234
Title:
wifi setting causes networkmanager crash
Status in netpla
Unfortunately, the underlying libyaml does not support parsing or
emitting comments, so we'd need to come up with some custom solution for
Netplan: https://github.com/yaml/libyaml/issues/42
Still, comment #5 holds true.
** Bug watch added: github.com/yaml/libyaml/issues #42
https://github.com/
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Tags added: fr-9498
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078555
Title:
Upgrading from 22.04 to 24.04.01 breaks dnsmasq
Stat
** Bug watch added: github.com/systemd/systemd/issues #32247
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/32247
** Also affects: systemd via
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/32247
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a me
In NetworkManager there exists the "connection.multi-connect" setting,
to allow a connection profile to be applied to multiple interfaces.
Netplan can currently control it through its
"networkmanager.passthrough" setting, e.g.:
network:
version: 2
renderer: NetworkManager
ethernets:
all
** Also affects: wpa (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2084553
Title:
system cannot to connect to
** Description changed:
- Network Manager 1.36 has a bug that prevents it to activate veth pairs.
- The problem was found in the Netplan's CI with the new support for veths
- in Netplan (because we run the tests on Jammy).
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ * Network Manager 1.36 has a bug that prevents it to act
The changes landed in upstream NetworkManager between 1.39.10-dev and
1.41.8-dev all of which is included in Noble.
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2033259
Title:
[SRU] NetworkMa
I've uploaded network-manager 1.46.0-1ubuntu2.2 into the Noble UNAPPROVED queue
for SRU review:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=network-manager
I'm bundling this with the pending SRU for 1.46.0-1ubuntu2.1 (LP:
#2084731)
--
You received this bug notification be
FTR: I've just uploaded a bundled SRU for network-manager
1.46.0-1ubuntu2.2, containing the changes from this bug report and
additionally the changes from bug #2033259
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-ma
** Description changed:
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ * Context: Running a dist-upgrade from Jammy to Noble.
+ * Starting with Noble (Mantic actually), NetworkManager integrates with
Netplan as a backend and calls 'netplan generate' at different stages, e.g.
when migrating old /etc/NetworkManager/sytem-co
Recent version of Netplan (v1.1.1-1++) make use of dh-python and
${python3:Depends} substvars (LP: #2077011), so there's nothing to be
fixed there.
NetworkManager pulling in (old) Netplan on dist-upgrade happens only on
dist-upgrades to Noble, so there's nothing to be fixed in NM on Jammy.
** Cha
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2084234
Title:
wifi setting causes netwo
Will be fixed in 1.1.1-1
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2084234
Title
There's another duplicate case of supporting comments in YAML generated
by Netplan. This time in /etc/netplan/ instead of /usr/lib/netplan/ (LP:
#2083920)
** Summary changed:
- debsums: changed file /lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml (from
ubuntu-settings package)
+ Ability to use comments
** Summary changed:
- wifi setting cause networkmanager crushed
+ wifi setting causes networkmanager crash
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2084234
Ti
On Ubuntu Noble and above, libnetplan is providing a stable 1.0 API and
also using the stable Python API, so a dependency on a specific python
version is not needed anymore. python3-netplan is shipping this file
instead: /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/netplan/_netplan_cffi.abi3.so
This PR is shipp
I'd suggest going with something like this in Jammy, to make sure
netplan.io, python3-netplan and libnetplan1 are upgraded prior to
network-manager triggering the Netplan integration, calling "netplan
generate".
```diff
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index a82f4c0c..25651a34 100644
-
** Tags added: sru-next
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Also affects: network-manager (Ubu
see bug #2083836
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2033259
Title:
netplan.script crashed with AttributeError in __getitem__():
/usr/bin/python3: und
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077159
Title:
i40e interfaces renamed after upgrade from h
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080489
Title:
Network Manager stops fun
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags added: rls-jj-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077159
Title:
** Also affects: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu Oracular)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You receiv
** Tags removed: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019940
Title:
Directly manipulating NetworkManager keyfiles
Status in augeas pac
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2032824
Title:
Veth pairs fail activation on
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
http
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2032824
Title:
Veth pairs fail activation on Jammy
Status in network-manager packag
** Tags added: fr-8841
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2032824
Title:
Veth pairs fail activation on Jammy
Status in network-manager package in Ubun
I wonder if Netplan should modify files in /usr/lib/netplan/ at all?
Yes, it needs to read those files, to get a full view of the
configuration. But writing should probably be limited to /run/ and
/etc/netplan/ ...
** Also affects: ubuntu-settings (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: N
This sounds like it needs a backported feature for systemd-networkd in
Focal, i.e. something that got fixed in networkd.
Did you try adding the "on-link: true" setting to your static routes in
the Netplan configuration? That might be able to work around the issue.
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubunt
You can put your trunk (enp3s0) as "optional: true" and it will still
wait for the vlans to be up. We might consider marking interfaces with
empty configuration (like "enp3s0: {}") to be "optional: true" by
default...
** Changed in: netplan
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You rec
You filed the bug report against NetworkManager. But the "up.d" hook is
called differently in NM, see https://netplan.io/faq#use-pre-up-post-up-
etc-hook-scripts
If this is about /etc/network/if-up.d then it should be targeted towards
the "ifupdown" package. I'm adding a corresponding bug task.
*
Let me mark it as invalid as I also already opened a bug ticket at the
debian bug tracker as we have the same results there as well. Probably
doesn't make sense to double track bugtickets then in this case, thanks!
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this b
** Description changed:
We have a scenario where we need to disable reverse lookups for
canonicalization in Kerberos as the customer's PTR records are not
consistent and lead to wrongly requested SPNs otherwise (see
https://web.mit.edu/kerberos/krb5-latest/doc/admin/princ_dns.html#reverse-
** No longer affects: kerberos
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063443
Title:
krb5.conf seems to ignore rdns = false
Status in krb5 package in Ubuntu:
New
** Description changed:
We have a scenario where we need to disable reverse lookups for
canonicalization in Kerberos as the customer's PTR records are not
- consistent and lead to wrongly requested SPNs otherwise.
+ consistent and lead to wrongly requested SPNs otherwise (see
+ https://web.mit
** Project changed: launchpad => kerberos
** Also affects: krb5 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063443
Tit
** Changed in: netplan
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060311
Title:
Setting "optional: true" to overcome he ti
Arguably, the "/usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml" should be
shipped by the network-manager package, instead of ubuntu-settings...
The community flavors using Calamares, might be covered by this PR:
https://github.com/calamares/calamares/pull/2284
** Also affects: ubuntu-settings (Ubunt
** Also affects: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Critical
Assignee: Matthew Ruffell (mruffell)
Status: In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to e2fsprogs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055012
Title:
When I upgraded from 22.04 to 2
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045096
Title:
Error in network definition: In
Thanks for the additional details!
In this case the output of "resolvectl" after "netplan apply" and after
resume (no "netplan apply") might be useful. In addition to debug-logs
of your systemd-resolved
$ sudo systemctl edit systemd-resolved
Adding:
```
[Service]
Environment=SYSTEMD_LOG_LEVEL=d
I didn't hear about any blocker and in the "Foundation Leadership Sync"
meeting people were overall positive about the change. I'm dropping the
"block-proposed" tag.
** Tags removed: block-proposed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, wh
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060311
Title:
Setting "optional: true"
Extensive testing, from different teams and individuals, has happened in
this bug report and especially in the upstream PR
https://github.com/canonical/netplan/pull/456. This is in addition to
the newly added build-time tests and autopkgtests.
This change affects the "systemd-networkd-wait-online"
signee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060311
Title:
Setting "optional: true" to overcome he timeout "Job
> In the past it was okay to NOT have "optional: true" set for both: encc000
> and encc000.2653 (and I found that logical, since both interfaces are needed
> in a VLAN context).
>
> Knowing now what's missing, I could live with that (even if it's a change in
> behavior).
Interesting.. I suspec
With version ~ppa5 we're now skipping the activation of systemd-
networkd-wait-online.service in case all Netplan interfaces are defined
to be "optional: true", using "ConditionPathIsSymbolicLink=" on
Netplan's s-n-wait-online.service enablement link, that's only set when
we have non-optional inter
Thanks for testing! There is a failure in your
systemd-networkd-wait-online.service logs:
> systemd-networkd-wait-online.service: Main process exited, code=exited,
> status=1/FAILURE
I fixed this failure in the ~ppa4 version. Could you confirm the failure
is gone with that newer version and stil
New attempt, that should be transparent to cloud-init, as we're just
creating a /run/systemd/systemd-networkd-wait-
online.service.d/10-netplan.conf override config, specifiying non-
optional interfaces as "/lib/systemd/systemd-networkd-wait-online -i
eth0 -i eth2 -i ..", but keeping the overall se
1 - 100 of 693 matches
Mail list logo
