@slashd I don't think we need anything special for systemd in the
debian/{control,rules} files, since we're not shipping full systemd
support with this. The slapd service is still handled by systemd-sysv-
generator(8), so there's no service units that we need to include or
activate in dh_systemd ru
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #926657
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=926657
** Also affects: openldap (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=926657
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Patch added: "lp1821343-disco.debdiff"
I've been doing some research on how we could implement a proper systemd
unit file for slapd, and came up with interesting results.
There are a number of options that we can pass to the slapd service that will
give us lots of troubles on an "idiomatic" service file. To give some examples:
- The P
The sysv init script does some funky parsing of configuration files that
might give us some trouble in an independent service file. I'll check if
we can't work around that and do away with the sysv init script
altogether, otherwise we might as well go with the drop-in override
since the new service
** Patch added: "debdiff for disco"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1821343/+attachment/5248489/+files/lp1821343-disco.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
htt
** Patch added: "debdiff for xenial"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1821343/+attachment/5248493/+files/lp1821343-xenial.debdiff
** Tags added: sts-sponsor
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscri
** Patch added: "debdiff for bionic"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1821343/+attachment/5248492/+files/lp1821343-bionic.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
h
** Patch added: "debdiff for cosmic"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1821343/+attachment/5248490/+files/lp1821343-cosmic.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
h
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821343
Title:
slapd process failure is not detected by systemd
Status in openldap package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
Status in
should
make the slapd service behave like a "normal" forking service. Nonetheless,
we'll perform scripted test runs to make sure no regressions arise.
** Affects: openldap (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Heitor R. Alves de Siqueira (halves)
Status: Confirme
There are two armhf autopkgtest regressions for apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.20, in
tests for apt [0] and autopkgtest [1]. From the autopkgtest pages we can
see that these regressions were introduced long before this SRU, so it
seems like a long standing issue unrelated to this patch.
[0] http://autopkgtest.u
Tested on apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.20 from trusty-proposed. Tried reproducing
according to the test case from description, and verified that apt-cache
does not crash:
ubuntu@apt-stress:~/stress-ng$ dpkg -l | grep apt
ii apt 1.0.1ubuntu2.20
(while having stress-ng runn
** Description changed:
[Impact]
apt crashes (core dump) during cache creation
[Description]
When executing apt-cache several times on a memory constrained system,
apt-cache can sometimes crash with a core dump file. This is related to mmap()
failing allocations during cache generatio
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
apt crashes (core dump) during cache creation
[Description]
When executing apt-cache several times on a memory constrained system,
apt-cache can sometimes crash with a core dump file. This is related to mmap()
failing allocations during cache generation, according
14 matches
Mail list logo
