[Touch-packages] [Bug 1452115] Re: Python interpreter binary is not compiled as PIE

2022-08-12 Thread Giovanni Pellerano
Hello! Do you consider possible to issue a PIE enabled package for Debian Bullseye (that runs python3 3.9)? Doko: what do you think? Thank you so much for evaluating this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pyt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1452115] Re: Python interpreter binary is not compiled as PIE

2022-02-25 Thread Giovanni Pellerano
Hello! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python2.7 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1452115 Title: Python interpreter binary is not compiled as PIE Status in Python: New Status in python2.7 packag

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1452115] Re: Python interpreter binary is not compiled as PIE

2020-08-06 Thread Giovanni Pellerano
Hello! Does anyone really care? 5 years passed since the original reporting of this issue and i'm starting to seriously think that this intended to cover up some zer0 day! Many were the justification to this related to performance but actually with many tests this appeared to not be the case: htt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1452115] Re: Python interpreter binary is not compiled as PIE

2020-08-06 Thread Giovanni Pellerano
** Also affects: python3.7 (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919134 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python2.7 in Ubuntu. https://bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1452115] Re: Python interpreter binary is not compiled as PIE

2019-09-21 Thread Giovanni Pellerano
Actually I confirm this on current ubuntu bionic. Would someone please reach the ubuntu security team and verify this is an intended choice? evilaliv3@evilaliv3:~$ hardening-check /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/python3: Position Independent Executable: no, normal executable! Stack protected: yes Fo