[Touch-packages] [Bug 2095001] Re: Very weird and dangerous bug in systemd's sudoing (polkit?) process

** Package changed: apparmor (Ubuntu) => policykit-1 (Ubuntu) ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1093276 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1093276 ** Also affects: policykit-1 (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1093276 Importance: Unknown

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2095004] Re: Internal hashtable error: illegal key supplied!

** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2095004] Re: Internal hashtable error: illegal key supplied!

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. I'm sorry for the inconvenience and as my colleague above mentioned we are monitoring the issue and working on getting the fix for it into the affected Ubuntu releases asap. Feel free to report any other issues you m

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2079970] Re: Debug symbols are unavailable for 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.18 (security update)

Hi Tobias, Thanks for reporting it! Indeed there seems some service was stuck and not syncing some dbgsym. Some hours ago the service was restarted and it started syncing the missing files. Could you confirm that you can now get the debug symbols you need? -- You received this bug notification b

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2078290] Re: package lvm2 2.03.07-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: installed lvm2 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2078356] Re: python3 upgrade has unmet dependencies

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2076129] Re: apt-get crashed with SIGBUS in XXH3_64bits_update()

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076129 Title: apt-get crashed with SIGBUS in XXH3_64bits_update()

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2076543] Re: do solve this

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2055270] Re: Buy Tramadol Online At Lowest Prices

** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055270 Title: Buy Tramadol Online At Lowest Prices Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054916]

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Since the package referred to in this bug is in universe or multiverse, it is community maintained. If you are able, I suggest coordinating with upstream and posting a debdiff for this issue. When a debdiff is availabl

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2050831] Re: Performance

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039217] Re: python apt Cache(memonly=True) does not behave as if memonly.

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python-apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039217 Title: python apt Cache(memonly=True) does n

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039712] Re: Two critical CVEs in zbar

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Both CVEs are already in our tracker[1][2]. We don't consider this issue to be a critical and have rated it to medium Priority [3]. Currently there are no fix available on upstream for those CVEs, see [4]. Since th

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039974] Re: package linux-image-6.2.0-35-generic 6.2.0-35.35~22.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2035585] Re: Versions in Ubuntu 20.04, 22.04 and 23.04 are vulnerable to CVE-2023-37329

** Changed in: gst-plugins-bad1.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gst-plugins-bad1.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2035585 Title: Versions in Ubuntu 20.0

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2035221] Re: driver problem

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2024396] Re: Xorg crash

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1989731] Re: Non-root user unable to change own password if pam_pwhistory is used

This is now released with usg 20.04.17 ** Changed in: usg Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1989731 Title: Non-root

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2019010] Re: environment variable SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND on server side set with wrong value

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2012148] Re: package libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgstbasecamerabinsrc-1.0.so.0', whi

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2007217] Re: error from xdiagnose application

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2007274] Re: I have ubuntu 22.04 on my system and have the following vulnerability : CVE-2022-46908. On which release/path of Ubuntu can I expect them to be fixed ?

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This is low priority CVE for us, it will only get patched if a higher priority CVE for sqlite3 in 22.04 shows up. Right now there are none, therefore no ETA. ** Description changed: I have ubuntu 22.04 on my syste

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1989731] Re: Non-root user unable to change own password if pam_pwhistory is used

** Project changed: ubuntu-security-certifications => usg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1989731 Title: Non-root user unable to change own password if pam_pwhi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1996494] Re: CVE-2022-2309: NULL Pointer Dereference allows attackers to cause a denial of service (or application crash)

** Changed in: libxml2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libxml2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.ne

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1995402] Re: cups keeps spool files forever and thus reveals confidential data

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security ** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1986832] Re: lag in animations and some other bugs

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1982898] Re: CVE-2021-46829: Buffer overwrite in io-gif-animation.c composite_frame() in gdk-pixbuf

Hi Joshua and Pedro, Have you reported the side effects of the fix to those projects you mentioned? If yes could you add the bug reports here? thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdk-pixbuf in Ubuntu. http

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1980664] Re: package linux-image-5.14.0-1044-oem 5.14.0-1044.49 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1891953] Re: CVE-2019-8936

** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891953 Title: CVE-2019-8936 Status in ntp package in Ubun

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1925705] Re: 100% cpu

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1924184] Re: drive not showing

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1924936] Re: package udev 247.3-3ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: o subprocesso instalado, do pacote udev, o script post-installation retornou erro do status de saída 1

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1901119] Re: nvidia-340

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895839] Re: CVE-2020-24977

** Changed in: libxml2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libxml2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895839 Title: CVE-2020-24977 Status in libxml2 package in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1900134] Re: package ubuntu-minimal 1.450.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1900288] Re: package bluez 5.48-0ubuntu3.4 failed to install/upgrade: installed bluez package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1893116] Re: IntelliJ Idea doesn't work properly. It's based on Ubuntu20.04

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892985] Re: package libegl-mesa0 20.0.8-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 [modified: usr/share/glvnd/egl_vendor.d/50_mesa.json] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892715] Re: package python3 3.7.5-1 failed to install/upgrade: new python3 package pre-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 127

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1885496] Re: Bluetooth is disabled in gui, but audio reciever's action button still controls Ubuntu

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1885496 Title: Bluetooth is disabled in gui, but audio re

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1875000] Re: [HP Pavilion dv2500 Notebook PC, Conexant CX20549 (Venice), Speaker, Internal] fails after a while. The speaker in laptop turns on and off automatically during boot

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile