`last` shows TTYs BTW.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2092307
Title:
w doesn't show TTYs
Status in procps package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
In f
`who -u -H` is a workaround.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2092307
Title:
w doesn't show TTYs
Status in procps package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
People actually reported this months ago:
https://askubuntu.com/questions/1519426/why-is-the-command-w-in-
ubuntu-24-04-different-than-older-versions
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu.
https://b
This could be an issue with
libutempter0:amd64 1.2.1-3build1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2092307
Title:
w doesn't show TTYs
Status in
procps version installed: 2:4.0.4-4ubuntu3.2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2092307
Title:
w doesn't show TTYs
Status in procps package in Ubuntu:
New
B
Public bug reported:
In fully updated Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS the `w` command doesn't show
controlling TTYs:
19:18:11 up 3 days, 3:48, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.02, 0.00
USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT
redacted1 192.168.1.2 Wed152:11m 0.0
It looks like this is also true in 22.04. I'm wondering if there is a
way to build it manually? I want to use OVS to manage the networks I use
with KVM virtual machines, but I've been unable to get it working due to
the lack of builtin network manager support.
I'd like to avoid moving to netplan i
Thanks to all who helped track down and fix this bug. I'm running Ubuntu
24.04. Will the default bluez eventually get updated to include this
fix? If so, I'm willing to wait a bit for the fix. If not, though, what
is the recommended fix? Build and install an updated bluez I assume?
Sorry for the na
Note that this commit deprecated ip=ibft in dracut:
https://github.com/dracut-ng/dracut-
ng/commit/5580e4c176c92624054691a8e12cffe8622cc1a0
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bug
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Tim Whisonant (tswhison)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1463120
Title:
Failure to boot if f
I didn't take an exhaustive look at the reported test failures, but the
ones I did look at above appear to be related to the test infrastructure
not starting up. Can we give those another kick to see if a subsequent
run does any better? Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you
Just wanted to follow-up to report that I've run the reproducer on Noble
and Oracular since the 17th and while I did reproduce the bug on both
releases with the old version of the package, I did not see any
occurrences with the new versions of the packages. If there are no
objections, I'll mark th
This bug was fixed in the package systemd - 257-2ubuntu1
---
systemd (257-2ubuntu1) plucky; urgency=medium
* Merge with Debian unstable. Remaining changes:
- debian/tests/tests-in-lxd: run some autopkgtests in LXD too
- debian/tests/boot-and-services:
+ skip apparmor t
This bug was fixed in the package systemd - 257-2ubuntu1
---
systemd (257-2ubuntu1) plucky; urgency=medium
* Merge with Debian unstable. Remaining changes:
- debian/tests/tests-in-lxd: run some autopkgtests in LXD too
- debian/tests/boot-and-services:
+ skip apparmor t
This bug was fixed in the package systemd - 257-2ubuntu1
---
systemd (257-2ubuntu1) plucky; urgency=medium
* Merge with Debian unstable. Remaining changes:
- debian/tests/tests-in-lxd: run some autopkgtests in LXD too
- debian/tests/boot-and-services:
+ skip apparmor t
Thank you, Dane.
Hello, util-linux maintainers:
Escalating this rather serious bug to you to analyze and get your
thoughts. When this occurs, the host is rendered unreachable. In #26,
Dane proposes a possible change to avoid leaving a system in this state.
Please let us know your thoughts on how
This bug was fixed in the package openssl - 3.4.0-1ubuntu2
---
openssl (3.4.0-1ubuntu2) plucky; urgency=medium
* d/p/fips/crypto-Automatically-use-the-FIPS-provider-when-the-kerne.patch:
Extend the patch to print the error encounted when a fallback
provider fails loading, e.
This bug was fixed in the package openssl - 3.4.0-1ubuntu2
---
openssl (3.4.0-1ubuntu2) plucky; urgency=medium
* d/p/fips/crypto-Automatically-use-the-FIPS-provider-when-the-kerne.patch:
Extend the patch to print the error encounted when a fallback
provider fails loading, e.
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: upower (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to upower in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
I have the same problem. Ubuntu 24.04 (fresh install, all packages
updated) will not charge an old HP EliteBook 8460 with healthy battery.
It worked fine with OpenSUSE 15.5.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to upow
After discussion with Julian, we came to the conclusion that I will try
to implement ip=ibft in initramfs-tools.
The first step will be to write test cases for it. At least two:
* one ibft with IPv4 (two interfaces on the client: one with DHCP server on the
other side and one without DHCP server)
Before uploading this (and shadow in bug 2089923) could you post a TL;DR
of the discussions in Debian that led to the migration of login from
shadow to util-linux? I think such a change warrants a broader public
discussion :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
Public bug reported:
Internal Speaker doesn't work
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.10
Package: alsa-base 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu7
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.11.0-13.14-generic 6.11.0
Uname: Linux 6.11.0-13-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.30.0-0ubuntu4
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInU
Different fix (for only CompressedValue.__len__):
https://github.com/canonical/apport/pull/423
** Changed in: apport
Milestone: None => 2.32.0
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs
When booting into Arch, you will just boot into the terminal, but here
the resolution seems to be bigger than the screen.
** Also affects: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: archlinux
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Yo
That is not possible for me. The GT330M was supported by the nvidia 340
driver, but that driver is unsupported. The GT330M is not supported in
newer versions of the nvidia driver. `ubuntu-drivers` does not list any
drivers either. It does on LTS 22.04 though.
--
You received this bug notification
I faced the same issue with the nouveau driver defaulting to the wrong
resolution during installation. Switching to a proprietary driver after
setup resolved it for me. Has anyone tried a similar fix?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
Public bug reported:
When booting the installation of 24.04 (LTS) I will be presented with a
nice screen. However the resolution is wrong. My screen is actually
1920x1080. However the installation uses a resolution of 2048x1536. It's
a wrong aspect ratio as well, 16:9 vs 4:3.
The weird thing is t
** Patch added: "oracular-1+dfsg-1:2+dfsg-1~1ubuntu24.10.1.diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librsvg/+bug/2089563/+attachment/5846481/+files/oracular-1+dfsg-1%3A2+dfsg-1~1ubuntu24.10.1.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded pac
** Description changed:
Impact
--
This is a new bugfix release from upstream:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg/-/raw/2.59.2/NEWS.
This component is covered by the GNOME MicroReleaseException
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/GNOME
Test plan
-
** Description changed:
Impact
--
- Contains several bug fixes:
+ This is a new bugfix release from upstream:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg/-/raw/2.59.2/NEWS.
+
+ This component is covered by the GNOME MicroReleaseException
+ https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/GNOM
Updating to mesa after reboot breaks my system, instead of login screen
appears white screen with message system breaks, system error
** Tags added: verification-failed-noble
** Tags removed: verification-done-noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
Thanks. So I am marking this bug as invalid for tzdata, since tzdata
behaves correctly.
The remaining bug is that programs misbehave when TZ doesn't contain a
valid time zone. Which GUI programs misbehave or crash? I'll mark
coreutils (which ships the date command) as affected:
```
$ TZ=Canada/Ea
Judging by the video it looks to me like you're seeing two different
framebuffers from the recent past. The reason nothing more recent is
replacing them and you see flicker is because the compositor thinks
Chrome has already opened over the top of the flickering window. So it
never gets updated.
*
34 matches
Mail list logo
