Public bug reported:
Imported from Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/1078721:
Package: iproute2
Version: 6.10.0-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
The first time I rebooted after iproute2 removed the /sbin/ip link, my system
failed to boot. I eventually discovered this w
This bug was fixed in the package busybox - 1:1.36.1-9ubuntu1
---
busybox (1:1.36.1-9ubuntu1) oracular; urgency=medium
* Merge with Debian unstable (LP: #2074188). Remaining changes:
- Add busybox-initramfs binary package and initramfs flavour:
- Add dirname from coreutils
Verfiication has been repeated with 1.17-6ubuntu4.7 from focal-proposed
and has been confirmed to fix the leak (memory usage is stable after
several hours - following the test procedure). Marking verification
done.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: veri
This bug was fixed in the package gzip - 1.12-1.1ubuntu1
---
gzip (1.12-1.1ubuntu1) oracular; urgency=medium
* Merge with Debian unstable (LP: #2074166). Remaining changes:
- debian/rules: Enable DFLTCC optimisations on s390x by default.
gzip (1.12-1.1) sid; urgency=medium
*
@Ernst
Is the file I uploaded of value?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982483
Title:
No sound from built-in speakers HP Pavilion All-in-One Desktop
There was no fix for the crashes, we just disabled the ppc64el qemu-
based tests to avoid hitting these crashes
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992178
Title:
--- Comment From cha...@us.ibm.com 2024-08-15 16:17 EDT---
What is the status of this bug? Looking at:
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/25091#issuecomment-1695289642
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/25091#issuecomment-1398091323
It looks like a couple of commits were
** Patch removed: "util-linux_2.39.3-9ubuntu10_2.40.2-1ubuntu1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/2072813/+attachment/5806203/+files/util-linux_2.39.3-9ubuntu10_2.40.2-1ubuntu1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Tou
** Patch added: "util-linux_2.40.2-1_2.40.2-1ubuntu1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/2072813/+attachment/5806204/+files/util-linux_2.40.2-1_2.40.2-1ubuntu1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages
At the time of writing, the build may fail due to dependency-wait on a
ruby package because of the ongoing ruby transition. I feel confident
with the upload due to a similar build (with the same new upstream
version) passing + passing autopkgtests. I'll follow the build(s) to
make sure it passes on
As previously discussed, we want to avoid the login package transition
introduced in 2.40.2-3, so merging with 2.30.2-1. Attaching debdiff as I
don't know how to make the git-ubuntu workflow work on not-latest.
** Patch added: "util-linux_2.39.3-9ubuntu10_2.40.2-1ubuntu1.debdiff"
https://bugs.
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ubuntu-settings has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you enc
This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-settings - 24.04.4
---
ubuntu-settings (24.04.4) noble; urgency=medium
* Drop obsolete evolution-data-server notify-with-tray override (LP:
#2072574)
-- Jeremy Bícha Wed, 10 Jul 2024 15:10:54 -0400
** Changed in: ubuntu-settings (Ubuntu
I forgot to add this bug to the changelog, but once 24.2.0-2ubuntu1
migrates, the fix is in oracular
** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in
I retried the remaining failing autopkgtests.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to e2fsprogs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2036467
Title:
Resizing cloud-images occasionally fails due to superblock ch
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apparmor
(4.0.1really4.0.1-0ubuntu0.24.04.3) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
libextractor/unknown (armhf)
libreoffice/4:24.2.5-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 (arm64)
stress-ng/unknown (armhf
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apparmor
(4.0.1really4.0.1-0ubuntu0.24.04.3) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
libextractor/unknown (armhf)
libreoffice/4:24.2.5-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 (arm64)
stress-ng/unknown (armhf
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apparmor
(4.0.1really4.0.1-0ubuntu0.24.04.3) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
libextractor/unknown (armhf)
libreoffice/4:24.2.5-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 (arm64)
stress-ng/unknown (armhf
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apparmor
(4.0.1really4.0.1-0ubuntu0.24.04.3) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
libextractor/unknown (armhf)
libreoffice/4:24.2.5-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 (arm64)
stress-ng/unknown (armhf
** Summary changed:
- Please merge 2.40.2-7 into oracular
+ Please merge 2.40.2-1 into oracular
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072813
Title:
Please me
** Summary changed:
- Please merge 2.40.2-1 into oracular
+ Please merge 2.40.2-7 into oracular
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072813
Title:
Please me
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete) => Graham Inggs (ginggs)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072813
Title:
Please m
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~cpete/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+git/util-linux/+merge/471356
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072
** Description changed:
(This is uploaded to noble as 2.8.1 per
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AptUpdates)
[Impact]
We have received feedback from users that use NIST-P256 keys for their
repositories that are upset about receiving a warning. APT 2.8.0 in
noble-proposed would bump the warning
** Description changed:
⚠️ Only land this in the release/updates pocket after PPAs have been
resigned
(This bumps the apt version to 2.8.0. APT uses the odd/even number
system, with 2.7.x being the development series for 2.8, and this is the
only change left for the 2.8 release, save
Hi, gentle ping on this; is there an ETA for this to land in 22.04? Let
me know if I can help with testing.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1597017
Title:
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted software-properties (0.99.49.1) for
noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties-qt/unknown (amd64, arm64, armhf, ppc64el, s390x)
Please visit the excuses page listed belo
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted software-properties (0.99.49.1) for
noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties-qt/unknown (amd64, arm64, armhf, ppc64el, s390x)
Please visit the excuses page listed belo
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2024-08-15 09:00 EDT---
I don't think the other patch is necessary. Stefan backported only
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=e903ada5e8881acec734eb3f89c3644bbd8da7e9
to gcc-14.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Public bug reported:
no idea what is hapenning
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: libnih-dbus1 1.0.3-12build1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-153.170-generic 5.4.235
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-153-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.6
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5Che
Public bug reported:
I dont know all the details all I know is that I cant update to the new
version of Ubuntu*
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: libnih1 1.0.3-6ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-153.170-generic 5.4.235
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-153-generic x86_64
ApportV
** Changed in: ca-certificates (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ca-certificates in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066990
Title:
Thanks iii, just saw this a few minutes ago.
Does it makes sense to also add:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=a247088adaf122116919235f4a40189506139495
(seems to be a bit related ...)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, whi
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2024-08-15 04:26 EDT---
Stefan has committed the patches:
master:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=e8a7142a697c5d2673adea33ba23af82a89c9559
gcc-14:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=e903ada5e8881acec734eb3f89c3644bbd8da7e9
--
You
Patch got upstream accepted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=e8a7142a697c5d2673adea33ba23af82a89c9559
It looks to me that it should be picked together with:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=a247088adaf122116919235f4a40189506139495
--
You received this bug notification
** Changed in: wireless-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Graham Inggs (ginggs)
** Changed in: wireless-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to wireless-too
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted software-properties (0.99.49) for noble
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties-qt/unknown (amd64, arm64, armhf, ppc64el, s390x)
Please visit the excuses page listed below
aircrack-ng is in -proposed.
*-desktop ones should drop dependency on rebuild.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to wireless-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075850
Title:
Stop shipping userspace
Test results are available here:
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-oracular-
liushuyu-011-gdb-testing/?format=plain.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
Hello James, or anyone else affected,
Accepted software-properties into noble-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-
properties/0.99.49.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new packa
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected,
Accepted software-properties into noble-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-
properties/0.99.49.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new pack
Accepting, but my request to amend the Test Plan from comment 2 still
stands, and needs adjusting (and SRU verification accordingly) prior to
SRU release.
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-n
Actually, no need to actually release, since it's identical to the
special binary package, right? So I can just accept the next SRU for
this package into noble-proposed and treat this bug as completed. When
that SRU lands, this no-binary-change one will, too.
--
You received this bug notification
OK I'm releasing this on the basis of Julian's justification above.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061214
Title:
[SRU] Software Sources is not
44 matches
Mail list logo
