[Touch-packages] [Bug 2008964] Re: resolved falls back to a non-preferred name server when the preferred name server appears to be working.

2023-03-01 Thread Frank Trampe
I was able to reproduce on Ubuntu 20.04 too (by switching the active network interface), so this may not be a recent regression. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2007728] Re: resolved results differ from those from its current upstream server.

2023-03-01 Thread Frank Trampe
I split the "Current DNS Server" issue into bug #2008964. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2007728 Title: resolved results differ from those from its current

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2008964] [NEW] resolved falls back to a non-preferred name server when the preferred name server appears to be working.

2023-03-01 Thread Frank Trampe
Public bug reported: This is split from bug #2007728. On a network with multiple DNS servers provided by DHCP, the "Current DNS Server" shown by `resolvectl status` is sometimes not the first server or even the second server, even when those servers appear to be working (and other hosts continue

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2007728] Re: resolved results differ from those from its current upstream server.

2023-03-01 Thread Frank Trampe
Alright. The failure on a specific .local domain is consistent. I have not tested adding a non-".local" domain to the preferred name server, but your explanation that resolved now fully excludes .local from DNS queries makes sense. I still think that this is undesirable behavior since it breaks com

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2008279] Re: glib2.0 2.75.3-3 breaks text input for Firefox & Chromium snaps

2023-03-01 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
@Jeremy: I figured out the nature of the issue you originally reported in this bug. With this combo: $ dpkg-query -W libglib2.0-0 gnome-settings-daemon gnome-settings-daemon 44~beta-1ubuntu1 libglib2.0-0:amd64 2.75.3-3 and as long as no IBus IM has been added to the list of input sources,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2000880] Re: systemd-networkd: ActivationPolicy ignored in VLANs

2023-03-01 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + The ActivationPolicy property in .network files is ignored for VLANs. + + [Test Plan] + + * On a Jammy machine with an interface named ens3, create the following + configs: + + $ cat > /etc/systemd/network/10-vlan18.netdev << EOF + [NetDev] + Name=vlan18

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2004478] Re: systemd-networkd's dhcp4 client ignores local subnet routes

2023-03-01 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + If a DHCP server pushes down a local subnet route with a null gateway, + the systemd-networkd DHCP client does not correctly install the route. + Instead, the route is ignored. + + [Test Plan] + + Taken from + https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/syst

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2008465] Re: apt repository broken when having only jammy and jammy-security apt-repos enabled

2023-03-01 Thread Athos Ribeiro
** Tags added: server-triage-discuss -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2008465 Title: apt repository broken when having only jammy and jammy-security apt-

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1970634] Re: FTBFS: mariadb fails to start due to low MEMLOCK limit

2023-03-01 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Removing the systemd jammy task, it's unlikely such a change would be SRUed. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix ** Tags removed: server-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscrib

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2007625] Re: New upstream microrelease 2.5.14

2023-03-01 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
** Also affects: openldap (Ubuntu Kinetic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Kinetic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sergio Durigan Junior (sergiodj) ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Kinetic) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug noti

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2007837] Re: Regression in stderr handling in 3.2.3 breaks BackupPc on 22.04; fix available in 3.2.4

2023-03-01 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
Thanks for the heads up, Simon. I talked to Marc and he confirmed that he intends to MRE rsync, so I reassigned this bug to him. ** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: Sergio Durigan Junior (sergiodj) => Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) ** Tags removed: server-todo -- You received this

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2007837] Re: Regression in stderr handling in 3.2.3 breaks BackupPc on 22.04; fix available in 3.2.4

2023-03-01 Thread Marc Deslauriers
Yes, I plan on releasing 3.2.7 to jammy and kinetic as a security update possibly next week, so that should take care of this issue at the same time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu. https://bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2007728] Re: resolved results differ from those from its current upstream server.

2023-03-01 Thread Frank Trampe
Now that you mention it, I'm not sure. Something was definitely inconsistent, but the inconsistency may have been across different internal names rather than across requests on the same name, and it did not occur to me at the time that the .local names were in a different category. I will check tom

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2007728] Re: resolved results differ from those from its current upstream server.

2023-03-01 Thread Nick Rosbrook
I am referring to the section of [1] that states that "lookups for domains with the ".local" suffix are not routed to DNS servers, unless the domain is specified explicitly as routing or search domain for the DNS server and interface." But now I am confused by what you are saying. Initially you sai

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2008279] Re: glib2.0 2.75.3-3 breaks text input for Firefox & Chromium snaps

2023-03-01 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
ibus in lunar-release was built against glib2.0 2.74.5-1. I tried a no- change rebuild of ibus against glib2.0 2.75.3-3, but it didn't help. (Such a rebuild may still be motivated later.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is sub

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2007728] Re: resolved results differ from those from its current upstream server.

2023-03-01 Thread Frank Trampe
Would you describe the "as documented" behavior? It still seems wacky to me that resolved returns the DNS result the majority of the time but not all of the time. If the design intent is to use only mDNS for .local domains, it ought to ignore DNS entirely for those domains. Inconsistent behavior me

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2007837] Re: Regression in stderr handling in 3.2.3 breaks BackupPc on 22.04; fix available in 3.2.4

2023-03-01 Thread Simon Déziel
I /think/ there is work being done by security to land a MRE for rsync, you might want to sync with @mdeslaur. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2007837 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2007728] Re: resolved results differ from those from its current upstream server.

2023-03-01 Thread Nick Rosbrook
I guess you are talking abut two separate issues here. I was addressing the "fails to resolve .local domains" issue. Please open a separate bug report, including debug-level logs from systemd-resolved, for the "inconsistent DNS server selection" issue. Generally, once a DNS server fails in some way

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2007837] Re: Regression in stderr handling in 3.2.3 breaks BackupPc on 22.04; fix available in 3.2.4

2023-03-01 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sergio Durigan Junior (sergiodj) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2007837 Title: Regression

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2007728] Re: resolved results differ from those from its current upstream server.

2023-03-01 Thread Frank Trampe
The first two servers do indeed provide the .local domains. The possible violation of RFC 6762 does not explain the inconsistency of the results or the regression from Ubuntu 18.04 and Ubuntu 20.04. There is no case in which the correct behavior for a single configuration is to query the "Current D

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2007728] Re: resolved results differ from those from its current upstream server.

2023-03-01 Thread Nick Rosbrook
I believe this is because you are defining ".local" domains in your DNS server. According to [1], "lookups for domains with the ".local" suffix are not routed to DNS servers, unless the domain is specified explicitly as routing or search domain for the DNS server and interface. This means that on n

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2008279] Re: glib2.0 2.75.3-3 breaks text input for Firefox & Chromium snaps

2023-03-01 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
Want to mention that the issue is not present with glib2.0 2.75.3-3 if fcitx5 is used instead of ibus. :/ ** Also affects: ibus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2008279] Re: glib2.0 2.75.3-3 breaks text input for Firefox & Chromium snaps

2023-03-01 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
With glib2.0 2.75.3-3 installed and when starting the Firefox snap from terminal I see these warning messages: [Parent 3792, Main Thread] WARNING: Unable to connect to ibus: Could not connect: Permission denied: 'glib warning', file /build/firefox/parts/firefox/build/toolkit/xre/nsSigHandlers.cpp:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1985057] Re: Camera output freeze when using pipewiresrc

2023-03-01 Thread Bin Li
The below two patches in Description could cause the screencast regression, so they were reverted, if we want add them again we need two gstreamer's patches in comment #51. * d/p/0001-buffers-ensure-buffer-size-does-not-exceed-maxsize.patch d/p/0002-gst-dequeue-a-shared-buffer-instead-of-ori

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2000817] Re: Wrong SHA256-value computed on kinetic

2023-03-01 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Kinetic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Kinetic) Ass

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1987631] Re: Screencast only records one second

2023-03-01 Thread Bin Li
For comment #38, currently it sounds good, if we upgrade the gstreamer to 1.20.4, we need backport below patch. commit d7b443197bcc0789305d6a8722bca1fdd182070b Author: Sebastian Keller Date: Thu Oct 6 00:20:16 2022 +0200 screencast: Don't force buffer copies on recent gstreamer versions

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1987631] Re: Screencast only records one second

2023-03-01 Thread Bin Li
@seb128, I went through this issue again. On 22.04.2, it works fine. With pipewire 0.3.48-1ubuntu3, because it revert the patches for Bug #1985057 , so currently we don't need to do SRU for this issue. To make this issue clear, let's focus on the SRU process on Bug #1985057. -- You received th

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2008279] Re: glib2.0 2.75.3-3 breaks text input for Firefox & Chromium snaps

2023-03-01 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
** Summary changed: - xsettings ibus commit broke text input for Firefox & Chromium snaps + glib2.0 2.75.3-3 breaks text input for Firefox & Chromium snaps ** No longer affects: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Tags added: rls-ll

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2008279] Re: xsettings ibus commit broke text input for Firefox & Chromium snaps

2023-03-01 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
Hmm.. Suddenly I could no longer type in the address bar of the Firefox snap. But I think the culprit is glib2.0 2.75.3-3, which I installed from -proposed yesterday in order to test build g-c-c from ubuntu/master. After having downgraded glib2.0 to 2.74.5-1 the issue is no longer present. ** Also