so, motd tells me 0 updates, but an apt update already shows me that
there are updates. apt upgrade /apt full-upgrade tell me that anyway.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.n
Reassigning since it fails even without libx11 1.8
** Package changed: libx11 (Ubuntu) => exim4 (Ubuntu)
** Summary changed:
- exim4 autopkgtest failure on ppc64el with libx11 1.8
+ exim4 autopkgtest failure on ppc64el
** Description changed:
I'm just filing a tracker bug for this issue but
The change is trivial and I'm going to upload it to the jammy SRU queue,
but we need a test case in order for this SRU to be accepted. If
someone affected by this bug can please detail how to reproduce the
issue *without* having to first generate a new installer image, that
would be useful.
It's
** Package changed: busybox (Ubuntu Jammy) => isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Jammy)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937110
Title:
dhcp option 121 & 249
Status in subiq
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted zlib into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zlib/1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1.4 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
http
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted htslib into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/htslib/1.10.2-3ubuntu0.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:/
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1956835 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956835
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 1956835, so it is being marked as such. Please look
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1956835 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956835
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 1956835, so it is being marked as such. Please look
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1956835 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956835
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 1956835, so it is being marked as such. Please look
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1956835 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956835
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 1956835, so it is being marked as such. Please look
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1956835 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956835
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 1956835, so it is being marked as such. Please look
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1956835 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956835
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 1956835, so it is being marked as such. Please look
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1956835 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956835
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 1956835, so it is being marked as such. Please look
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1956835 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956835
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 1956835, so it is being marked as such. Please look
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1956835 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956835
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1956835
zsys cleanup of /boot should be reevaluated
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which i
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1956835 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956835
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1956835
zsys cleanup of /boot should be reevaluated
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which i
I found a fix for the speakers and several other issues.
I submitted the patch to the alsa-devel mailing list, where it was applied by
one of the sound subsystem maintainers. It will now slowly travel towards
mainline.
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-
devel/2022-July/204315.html
The traceback is really in UbuntuDrivers/detect.py which is part of
ubuntu-drivers-common. Looking at the code it hasn't changed with the
latest version of ubuntu-drivers-common (1:0.9.6.1) so this still needs
fixing.
** Information type changed from Private to Public
** Tags added: rls-jj-incomi
Will have a look at the normal hold situation, but would like to know
where you see the disagreement in numbers - is it apt update and apt
full-upgrade?
What does motd / update-notifier say?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
I assume this is for the new implementation in 2.4.6. This is
unfortunately not feasible as the code works the same way as upgrades
held back for other reasons.
Some hacks could be added that improve this in most situations but that
also requires significant refactoring and does not solve all the
Public bug reported:
when opting out of phased updates, apt still tells me that there are
updates.
Expected behaviour: should hide those updates.
** Affects: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
To
** Tags added: se-sponsor-halves
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1983100
Title:
dotnet build intermittently crashes with segfault on Ubuntu 18.04
Status in
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~michal-maloszewski99/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+git/apparmor/+merge/427973
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
** Changed in: sudo (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
** Changed in: sudo (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sudo in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
Actually, somebody will need to manually retrigger the gdcm test with
the version of zlib in -proposed and I'll do that now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/19614
Nicolas and I talked about a brief review of the debdiff,
and he kindly agreed to provide an update/v2 to address:
- changelog version and description line
- patches dep3 headers and lpnumber- prefix
... while patches are reviewed for feedback (not yet done).
Thanks, Nicolas!
--
You received th
Also have this issue again in 22.04.1 LTS version.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1855793
Title:
Wi-Fi becomes unusally slow all of a sudden and fo
Update: this has been fixed in Focal (same fix commit):
openssl (1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.11) focal; urgency=medium
* Fixup pointer authentication for armv8 systems that support it when
using the poly1305 MAC, preventing segmentation faults. (LP: #1960863)
- d/p/lp-1960863-crypto-poly1305-asm-fi
The requested commits/patches were added and test packages '0.24.1-1ubuntu1'
were build in PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/lp1982841/+packages
The builds also trigger intensive tests, that were all successful:
Testsuite summary for p11-kit 0.24.1
==
** Patch added: "openssl-atexit-1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1983100/+attachment/5607147/+files/openssl-atexit-1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubunt
** Description changed:
[Impact]
Bionic's OpenSSL 1.1.1 package
(https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/bionic/+source/openssl) is the only
version of openssl 1.1.1 on any distro that we've encountered that does
not have support for the OPENSSL_NO_ATEXIT functionality from 1.1.1b
(openssl/ope
This string does not exist in apt or any of the other Ubuntu code I have
checked out. If you can reproduce it, do check where it is coming from
and reassign it there.
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => ubuntu
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notif
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to geoclue-providers in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1100326
Title:
Location requested by webs
ACK on the debdiff in comment #5, I am currently building it (with a
slight change to add the bug number to the changelog) and will release
it as a security update next week. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribe
It is (much) better to use the more sophisticated workaround that does
not disable cgroups v2.
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 07:32, mtu <1951...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
>
> I see the same as Stephen in c46: snap-Firefox fails to start locally,
> _sometimes_ – the error is not readily reproducable.
>
>
There is now a solution for LP#1983255.
Meanwhile I've noticed that gdcm is now flagged as a new regression for
zlib's proposed miration at 'update excuses' (was not the case before).
Found that this happened on Debian too:
https://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org/msg1863513
Public bug reported:
Problem:
We have prepared an rsa2048 keypair in tpm2 and would like to access it
using the pkcs11 engine of OpenSSL which fails as described below.
Please note that the error messages pasted below look somewhat related
to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tpm2-tss/+b
Hi Joshua and Pedro,
Have you reported the side effects of the fix to those projects you mentioned?
If yes could you add the bug reports here?
thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdk-pixbuf in Ubuntu.
http
38 matches
Mail list logo
