Hi David,
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 00:03, David Nalley wrote:
> I largely agree with your analysis of the conversation from the talk page.
> Looking back, I have seen this exact conversation occur previously
> (and similarly disastrously (and I don't have any qualms saying that
> as 1. I was part
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Matthew Jadud wrote:
> Hi Mel,
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 08:58, Mel Chua wrote:
>> I'm not quite sure what to do with this sort of thing. Here's a
>> conversation log explaining a concept covered in the textbook (in this
>> case, version control) to a student as
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 09:21:25PM -0400, Ralph Morelli wrote:
> I think it would be great if there were resources ($$) to support more
> summer efforts.
> GSoC is great, but, as far as I understand it, faculty aren't involved in
> that so you don't really have the mediating necessary if we're goi
Hi Matt,
I read through your very impressive analysis of the conversation and
couldn't agree more--especially with your point about scaffolding:
*In conclusion, "Productively lost" is a wonderful thing... but I suspect
that *
*more than 95% of potential contributors are lost simply because the *
Hi Mel,
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 08:58, Mel Chua wrote:
> I'm not quite sure what to do with this sort of thing. Here's a
> conversation log explaining a concept covered in the textbook (in this
> case, version control) to a student asking questions about it.
>
> http://teachingopensource.com/inde
I'm not quite sure what to do with this sort of thing. Here's a
conversation log explaining a concept covered in the textbook (in this
case, version control) to a student asking questions about it.
http://teachingopensource.com/index.php/Talk:Getting_the_Code
Participants:
Annie Morino (morinoa
