Re: [tor-talk] tor debian repository for non x86 arch? (arm)

On Feb 21, 2012, at 1:07 AM, Damian Johnson wrote: > Hi tagnaq, from what I was aware of it's in there... > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/3391 > > That said, I'm not quite sure where it's located. > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 3:13 PM, tagnaq wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MES

Re: [tor-talk] A "paranoid" question

On Mar 16, 2012, at 11:42 PM, Raynald wrote: > Hi. > > How can I trust that the intermediate TOR computers are not really a > central network for tracking and processing the communications? > > I see that the main sponsor is "An anonymous North American NGO" - New > Global Order? :D - and, I d

Re: [tor-talk] "EVIL bug" Linux Tor Browser Bundle (2.2.35-8)

On Mar 19, 2012, at 7:11 PM, clarissabryant wrote: > On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:51:17 -, m...@tormail.net wrote: >> Wow, Anonymous! Wow, what an amazing, "bug". > > Drama. Clearly exposing your own browsing on your own file system on your own > computer is a conspiracy of epic proportions. If t

Re: [tor-talk] About sources of TBB

On Mar 24, 2012, at 4:29 PM, James Brown wrote: > On 24.03.2012 15:01, James Brown wrote: >> On 24.03.2012 14:57, James Brown wrote: >>> I have got TBB-sources from here: >>> https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser-details.html.en#build >>> >>> But when I try to verify that, I have so str

Re: [tor-talk] Absence of digital signature of TBB sources

On Apr 4, 2012, at 2:34 PM, and...@torproject.is wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 10:44:10AM +, rransom.8...@gmail.com wrote 0.7K > bytes in 20 lines about: > : The official TBBs are built from the sources in Git, not from the > : tarballs. There probably shouldn't be any release tarballs f

Re: [tor-talk] building tor-0.2.3.15-alpha on Ubuntu

On May 20, 2012, at 9:32 AM, BigTor wrote: > People, > > Because I guess there's a better way to build Tor from source on my > Ubuntu 12.04 box than I do, I ask for some help. I want to build Tor > from source with my build-from-source openssl 1.0.1c. My OpenSSL install > is in /usr/local/ssl/ ,

Re: [tor-talk] Python upgrade breaks 'random' in ARM..

On May 25, 2012, at 4:45 PM, Eric Seerden wrote: > Hi Damian et al. > > I'm running Tor-0.2.3.15.alpha on FreeBSD 9.0, all fine.. > However, I upgraded Python26 to version 2.6.8 (= up-to-date with port) & it > breaks ARM.. > > => File "/usr/share/arm/starter.py" line 18 in > import cli.control

Re: [tor-talk] tor-0.2.4.2-alpha compile errors

On Sep 14, 2012, at 9:34 AM, grarpamp wrote: > Some easy ones... [snip] What compiler is that, and version? The code in main.c has been like this for a while, I wonder why it didn't come up before. ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.o

Re: [tor-talk] Hidden Services

On Sep 17, 2012, at 12:19 AM, Scurvy Scott wrote: > I'm sure this has been asked on here before but: > > Is it "possible" to basically brute force tor hidden services by simply > visiting every possible .onion address and then indexing the ones that are > active? Yes all 32^16 possibilities.. Is

Re: [tor-talk] can't get tor to work :(

On Mar 8, 2011, at 10:22 PM, Scott Bennett wrote: Thank you for the explanation, Roger. I see that the bug must have been present in all of the versions of tor running that the authorities were running at the time, which suggests that the rule about having the authorities be spread acr

Re: [tor-talk] seeking someone to fix a Tor rpm bug

On Mar 10, 2011, at 12:38 PM, Erinn Clark wrote: Hey Marco! * Marco Bonetti [2011:03:10 12:10 +0100]: Primarily I am worried about the upgrade scenario and changing groups in a way that doesn't break previous versions of the packages. Could you elaborate a bit on the issues? So far my und

Re: [tor-talk] Tor 0.2.3.1-alpha is out!

On May 6, 2011, at 2:30 AM, Jim wrote: > > > Nick Mathewson wrote: >> Changes in version 0.2.3.1-alpha - 2011-05-05 >> >> Tor 0.2.3.1-alpha adds some new experimental features, including ... >> automatic home router configuration. > > Are you saying the Tor software itself (as opposed to Vi

Re: [tor-talk] Tor 0.2.3.1-alpha w/o traffic

On May 8, 2011, at 9:53 PM, Olaf Selke wrote: > hi, > > after two days all blutmagie routers appear to have been dropped from > the consensus. Does v0.2.3.1 trigger an old "extra-info descriptor > exceeding 50k" bug again? Today the my stats directories grew beyond 50k. > > regards Olaf Do you

Re: [tor-talk] drops from the consensus

On May 29, 2011, at 9:26 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote: > On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 09:15:33PM +0200, Olaf Selke wrote: >> the last three weeks I noticed blutmagie as well as torserver.net >> routers sporadically being dropped from the consensus. The routers have >> perfect uptimes and IP connectivity

Re: [tor-talk] ReachableAddresses *:* harmful?

On Jun 3, 2011, at 6:52 AM, Fernan Bolando wrote: > Thanks, Actually openbsd seems to defaults this to > ReachableAddresses *:80,*:443 Did you (or does openbsd) set the FascistFirewall option by chance? How did you learn that openbsd defaults to ReachableAddresses *:80,*:443? Thanks Sebastian _

Re: [tor-talk] Tor 0.2.2.30-rc is out

On Jul 10, 2011, at 11:04 PM, David H. Lipman wrote: > I get confused where to download. > > I only found Win32 unstable 0.2.2.29 :-( > From: "Roger Dingledine" >> Packages will appear on the download page in the coming days. Be patient :) ___ tor-t

Re: [tor-talk] Possible Attack on Tor speed?

On Aug 24, 2011, at 10:54 AM, morphium wrote: > Hi, > > I just had an idea, how an attacker could slow down the Tor network, > and wanted it to discuss with you. > To my knowledge, there is only the BadExit and BadDirectory flag, > nothing like BadNode. > In contrast to a bad exit, which is misb

Re: [tor-talk] tor-0.2.2.32 compilation failure

On Aug 30, 2011, at 10:59 PM, grarpamp wrote: > Hi. I have a box: i386 FreeBSD RELENG_4, GCC 2.95.4. > openssl 0.9.8r, libevent 1.4.14b. > > tor-0.2.1.30 is fine with the above. > With tor-0.2.2.32 I get this. Any ideas? Thanks. try this patch: diff --git a/src/common/torgzip.c b/src/common/to

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Browser Bundle: PGP encryption built-in?

On Oct 10, 2011, at 2:48 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote: > On 10/10/2011 2:44 AM, Robert Ransom wrote: >> No. See https://tails.boum.org/bugs/FireGPG_may_be_unsafe/ , but beware -- >> I'm sure katmagic and I missed a few dozen attacks. > You're correct - that is, the https site you link has an unsafe cer

Re: [tor-talk] since today check.torproject.org states "you are not using tor"

On Oct 15, 2011, at 11:27 PM, and...@torproject.org wrote: > On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 04:39:25PM -0400, and...@torproject.org wrote 0.9K > bytes in 21 lines about: > : For some reason, the exit list doesn't see checktpo as a valid exit. If > : I can't figure it out in an hour, I'll just disable t

Re: [tor-talk] Suggestion: make _hidden services_ choose random entry nodes often!

On Oct 21, 2011, at 2:27 PM, hi...@safe-mail.net wrote: > All standard clients have the same entry nodes on a permanent basis or as > long as the entry nodes are up, while the middle and exit nodes changes > all the time. This is to reduce the chance of choosing an accidental path > that is en

Re: [tor-talk] Suggestion: make _hidden services_ choose randomentry nodes often!

On Oct 22, 2011, at 2:03 PM, hi...@safe-mail.net wrote: > Original Message > From: Sebastian Hahn > Apparently from: tor-talk-boun...@lists.torproject.org > To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org > Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Suggestion: make _hidden services_ cho

[tor-talk] New operator for gabelmoo (one of Tor's directory authorities)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi tor-talk, As of today I'm the new operator of the directory authority gabelmoo. Karsten Loesing, who has been operating it since early 2008, decided to focus more on software development and less on the sysadmin overhead that running a directory a

Re: [tor-talk] Exit enclave without middle node

On Oct 31, 2011, at 10:56 AM, t...@lists.grepular.com wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to set up an exit enclave on a machine I have, but I don't want > it to relay any other traffic. Not even as a middle node. It only seems > to be possible to set up a server as an exit enclave if you also make it > a

Re: [tor-talk] Tor no longer works with win2K ??

I'll pretend you didn't insult me and the rest of the Tor dev team, and try and get your question answered. I've snipped the useless allegations. On Nov 12, 2011, at 12:52 PM, Anon Mus wrote: > Jacob Appelbaum wrote: >> On 11/10/2011 02:39 AM, Anon Mus wrote: >>> I got a message to upgrade my Tor

Re: [tor-talk] Tor no longer works with win2K ??

On Nov 14, 2011, at 3:45 AM, Jim wrote: > Since I don't run Microsoft software I have not paid a great deal of > attention to the downloads the Tor Project offers for it. So I went and > took a look at your download pages to see what Anon Mus was talking > about. I see that for the bundles, you

Re: [tor-talk] MapAddress and AllowDotExit

On Nov 24, 2011, at 3:10 PM, Jim wrote: > Hi All, > > I just discovered empirically that to allow the MapAddress option to > work, AllowDotExit must be set to 1. > > 1) While perhaps this was written between the lines, I didn't find it > spelled out out anywhere. If it is to remain this way,

Re: [tor-talk] DNSl eakage

On Dec 6, 2011, at 9:16 AM, kamyar kamyar wrote: > Hi, > > It seems that "Expert Bundle" is just a SocksProxy, > i did configure my browser's port as 9050 and could surf the web, but what > about "DNS leakage" issue ? > > after following article /tor/wiki/doc/Preventing_Tor_DNS_Leaks > steps ad

Re: [tor-talk] Tor - 1-click-compile-version

Hi hmoh, On Dec 23, 2011, at 3:23 PM, h...@safe-mail.net wrote: > Tor and all stuff is Open Source and many people looking inside for security > review. A very weak link is that most users use the precompiled ready to use > binaries. But it is not possible to be sure that binaries are build from

Re: [tor-talk] Tor - 1-click-compile-version

On Dec 24, 2011, at 12:21 AM, Chris wrote: > [snip] > > The threat here potentially comes from governments mandating a back door. All Tor developers that have voiced their opinion on the matter of backdoors state that they would never put in a backdoor, and personally I would immediately quit th

Re: [tor-talk] Automatic vulnerability scanning of Tor Network?

On Dec 27, 2011, at 7:03 AM, John Case wrote: > > On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Lee wrote: > >>> While I totally get both sides of this argument *in theory*, all of this >>> sounds a lot to me like getting pissed off about someone ringing your >>> doorbell because they didn't mail you an opt-in form fir

Re: [tor-talk] Google as default search engine revisited

On Jan 10, 2012, at 5:26 PM, 5...@gmx.de wrote: > I found a thread in the archive (November 2011), but I could not > find a satisfying answer to the questions > > 1. Why is Google the default search engine in the TOR browser bundle? Because it's the default search engine in Firefox > 2. Does T

Re: [tor-talk] where did Aurora go?

On Feb 10, 2012, at 9:47 PM, eliaz wrote: > Upon the last TBB update, Aurora 9 was replaced by FFox 10, the same > FFox that I use for my clear browsing. Both have the same icon, which > makes it a bother to be sure I'm in the correct browser (while I'm still > running Vidalia from the same HD as

Re: [tor-talk] bridge up & down times

On Feb 12, 2012, at 11:38 PM, eliaz wrote: > I have a few novice questions about a normal bridge I've set up. I've > not found answers in the documentation. > > * Opposite the one country that's so far listed in the usage summary, > the #Client column shows "1-8". What does this mean exactly? 1

[tor-talk] The Tor network doesn't support Named relays anymore

Dear Tor users, the system for naming relays has been an issue for a long time. Referring to a relay by the operator-chosen nickname in your Tor configuration file was never a great idea if you wanted to rely on Tor using that specific relay. As a band-aid, the Tor directory authorities implemente

Re: [tor-talk] [tor-consensus-health] Consensus issues

Hi Sebastian, thanks for looking after the network! On 16 Aug 2014, at 22:56, Sebastian G. wrote: > On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 19:46:15 + (UTC) the doctor said: >> NOTICE: Consensus belonging to maatuska was missing the following authority >> signatures: tor26 >> NOTICE: Consensus belonging to tor

Re: [tor-talk] Dropping Tor Browser support for Mac OSX 10.6?

On 03 Sep 2014, at 17:08, Tor Talker wrote: > [Short answer] > As an individual user, I don't need Tor on Mac OS 10.6, but as a developer of > a soon to be released Tor-dependent project I would like to see support > continue. > > [Long answer] > We are developing a system called HideMeta tha

[tor-talk] Changes for dirauth gabelmoo

Hey there, it's been almost 3 years since I started maintaining gabelmoo, and I'd like to give you an update. Soon, gabelmoo will get a new hosting environment along with a much-needed hardware upgrade. Along with a much better connection, I'll hope gabelmoo can serve the Tor network for quite som

Re: [tor-talk] http://localhost:631/

On 09 Sep 2014, at 09:36, Hartmut Haase wrote: > why can't Tor Browser connect to that page? localhost is your own computer, and you can't open a connection to your own machine using a Tor client. Cheers Sebastian -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or chan

Re: [tor-talk] Changes for dirauth gabelmoo

Hello again, On 05 Sep 2014, at 01:21, Sebastian Hahn wrote: > it's been almost 3 years since I started maintaining gabelmoo, and I'd > like to give you an update. Soon, gabelmoo will get a new hosting > environment along with a much-needed hardware upgrade. Along with a much

[tor-talk] Replacing a dirauth: Welcome longclaw

Hi there, after many years of service Mike Perry is retiring his dirauth, turtles. It hasn't been functional for some time, so we decided to add a new dirauth to replace it. The new dirauth will be hosted by Micah Anderson (hi Micah). It'll bring some more geographical diversity to the Tor network

Re: [tor-talk] Tor and solidarity against online harassment

On 14 Dec 2014, at 07:06, Mirimir wrote: > Is down? > > => yes > > DDoS? It's up intermittently. I'd suspect ddos atm, yes. Cheers Sebastian -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To

[tor-talk] Removal of Vidalia content from our website

Hi tor-talk, we have stopped updating our Vidalia bundles a long time ago, today I've removed the download links and related documentation from the Website. At this time, Vidalia has been unmaintained for too long to be a recommended solution. Cheers Sebastian signature.asc Description: Message

Re: [tor-talk] tor --verify-config opens listeners? (for short timeframe)

> On 23 Feb 2015, at 23:33, Nusenu wrote: > I stumpled on this while debugging an ansible role. > > It basically does this: > tor --verify-config -f foo.torrc > tor -f foo.torrc > > while the torrc is fine and the first tor execution retuns 0 the > second one will *sometimes* fail (depends on e

Re: [tor-talk] The following directory authorities recommend other client versions than the consensus: gabelmoo

Hi, On 07 Feb 2014, at 08:05, tor-admin wrote: > This message was reported by the Doctor: > > NOTICE: The following directory authorities recommend other client versions > than the consensus: gabelmoo +0.2.2.39 +0.2.4.15-rc +0.2.4.5-alpha +0.2.4.6- > alpha +0.2.4.7-alpha +0.2.4.10-alpha +0.2.4.

Re: [tor-talk] messing with XKeyScore

On 05 Jul 2014, at 15:08, Roman Mamedov wrote: > On Sat, 5 Jul 2014 03:59:28 + > Matthew Finkel wrote: > >> This problem makes me sad on many levels, and I'm not opposed to >> implementing mitigation techniques (within reason) based on the >> rulesets, however we shouldn't do anything that

Re: [tor-talk] #nottor

> On 03 Dec 2015, at 08:30, Andreas Krey wrote: > > On Wed, 02 Dec 2015 17:32:22 +, coderman wrote: > ... >> the collective defect identification efforts in real-time have moved >> to channel #nottor. > > Speaking of which - what's up with #tor and #nottor. > > I'm using irssi (and am rela

Re: [tor-talk] Does Facebook Onion Work?

Hi blobby, > On 17 Feb 2016, at 21:17, blo...@openmailbox.org wrote: > Does Facebook still provide an onion link? > > Because I've tried https://www.facebookcorewwwi.onion/ and I get a > neverending loop in which the site loads and loads and loads... > > Any ideas? the correct address is https

Re: [tor-talk] Does Facebook Onion Work?

> On 17 Feb 2016, at 22:15, David Goulet wrote: > On 17 Feb (22:10:44), Sebastian Hahn wrote: >>> On 17 Feb 2016, at 21:17, blo...@openmailbox.org wrote: >>> Does Facebook still provide an onion link? >>> >>> Because I've tried https://www.faceb

Re: [tor-talk] Directory problems?

Hi there, > On 18 Mar 2016, at 14:11, tor_t...@arcor.de wrote: > Hi Kristoffer Rath Hansen and Tor Talkers > > maybe these links i found with some search engines may help > === > https://sourceforge.net/p/advtor/discussion/942232/thread/1704cbae/#9f2d > Start AdvOR, open OR Network → Authorities

[tor-talk] Invalid consensus today

Hi there, different threads on this list have already begun popping up about today's 0700 UTC consensus. The reason is that the dirauths did not produce a consensus that was signed by all 9, but rather the vote was split (this happens sometimes and usually causes no great concern). The dirauth dan

Re: [tor-talk] Directory problems?

> On 18 Mar 2016, at 15:17, Sebastian Niehaus > wrote: > Am 18.03.2016 um 14:11 schrieb tor_t...@arcor.de: > >> then start connect to tor. Also you can open AdvOR.ini and this to [torrc] >> section. > > If there are problems with multiple authorities there might be something > strange going o

Re: [tor-talk] Is it possible to get a Node-Chain with 3 nodes from ONE country?

> On 21 Mar 2016, at 08:27, Ben Stover wrote: > > Is it possible to get a Node-Chain with 3 nodes from ONE country? Yes. -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Re: [tor-talk] Is Tor 32 bit only?

> On 13 Dec 2016, at 01:14, hi...@safe-mail.net wrote: > > I was just wondering if you compile Tor on a 64 bit Linux distro, will it > make a 64 bit executable? Or is it 32 bit only? Would be nice if it had > supported 64 bit processing. Tor has full support for x86_64 (it's the preferred platf

Re: [tor-talk] 33c3 and tor?

Hi, > On 20 Dec 2016, at 14:37, fatal wrote: > an early version of the fahrplan for 33c3 is released¹ (btw. also the > 33c3 app on f-droid is already available). > > I couldn't find any talks from the tor-project yet, but maybe I've > overlooked them? Will there be any? > > And will there be a

Re: [tor-talk] Possibly Smart, Possibly Stupid, Idea Regarding Tor & Linux Distributions

Hi Alec, thanks for your thoughts. I have just one very quick comment, but it seems you haven't addressed it yet: > On 03 Jan 2017, at 03:04, Alec Muffett wrote: > > Where I feel that issues arise are in the older Ubuntus and Debians. > > Again, I understand that there are "backports" repos, b

Re: [tor-talk] Possibly Smart, Possibly Stupid, Idea Regarding Tor & Linux Distributions

Hi Alec, > On 04 Jan 2017, at 12:24, Alec Muffett wrote: > > Actually, I don't believe that you do disagree with the problem statement > :-) > > I believe that you may concerns with one of my proposed solutions to the > problem, and that's okay because I do too. :-) > > Let me see if I can re