On 1/11/2013 10:57 PM, grarpamp wrote:
A $2 USD BTC deposit could be sent. Kept if
account closed for commercial spam/virus and DMCA. Returned when
user cancels account. But other than those two situations, and
absent legal order, google not be in a position to intervene
(nanny/'abuse') becaue it
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:57:55 -0800
AMuse wrote:
> You can also use IMAP with GMail over TOR.
I was just about to suggest that.
I think only the web interface kicks Tor users out. I always use gmail
through IMAP (for PGP mail cryptography), and i've never had a problem.
You don't need any Javas
ators are saying that CloudFlare is...
> > --
> > tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk
On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 11:49:38 -0500
Tommy Butler via DFW-pm wrote:
> The Perl
> Conference (also affectionately referred to as “YAPC::NA”) is the
> premiere North American event featuring training, workshops,
> hackathons for all things Perl and for all skill levels.
I'm assuming that "YAPC" stan
June 6 2016 12:55 AM, "CANNON NATHANIEL CIOTA" wrote:
> Another idea, if micro delays would not work out for low latency anonymizing
> networks such as Tor would be to perhaps add padding, randomized padding
> between each node. If
> micro-delays and/or padding is bad idea, then other solutions s
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 18:31:50 + (UTC)
wrote:
> When I look at thehiddenwiki.org, I see a bunch of .onion sites, with
> random looking names. Why is this? What if someone at
> thehiddenwiki.org registered a new .onion site (for example
> http://somerandomletters.onion), which then relayed traff
Meek is pretty cool.
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:02:03 -0800
David Fifield wrote:
> For about four days (January 29 to February 1, 2016), meek-azure was
> blocked in China. The blocking may not have been intended for
> meek-azure, and may not have been deliberate blocking, but it had the
> effect of b
On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 04:18:08 +0200 (CEST)
tor_t...@arcor.de wrote:
> in times of internet of things they will empty your home completely
> from the lamp to the fridge including your driverless car do you
> remember the dump behind the place "from dusk till dawn"
You have to be ready for anything a
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 15:55:37 -0700
Ryan Carboni wrote:
> If mtor is implemented, I don't see any loss of security over Tor.
> Although many web applications are currently designed for unicast.
MTor sounds like a fascinating concept.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To un
Is Tor ever going to include support for isolated, independent bridge
relay communities that can host their own bridge directory authorities
without relying on the centralized tor directory hosted by Peter
Palfrader, Jacob Appelbaum and associates?
From lurking here on the mailing lists and ot
On 04/12/2013 10:27 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
Cool story bro.
I know.
We're worried about these things too, I guess.
I believe it. I'm in the market for a bridge, if you'll sell one to me.
I mean, if killing us all is really the best way to stop Tor, then I
would submit to you that Tor is u
On 04/12/2013 10:37 PM, adrelanos wrote:
Hi Alex,
these are interesting thoughts. I wrote something related a while ago.
Tor: lobbies vs lobbies - Who will prevail?:
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2012-August/025109.html
Alex M (Coyo):
Is Tor ever going to include support
On 04/12/2013 10:47 PM, Griffin Boyce wrote:
Alex M (Coyo) wrote:
Is Tor ever going to include support for isolated, independent bridge
relay communities that can host their own bridge directory authorities
without relying on the centralized tor directory hosted by Peter Palfrader,
Jacob
On 04/12/2013 11:01 PM, adrelanos wrote:
Griffin Boyce:
There's really nothing keeping you from making a private bridge network.
The documentation's all there.
Indeed. One can even make its own (private) Tor network. It will require
a considerable amount of learning, though.
It would be inte
On 04/12/2013 11:01 PM, adrelanos wrote:
Griffin Boyce:
There's really nothing keeping you from making a private bridge network.
The documentation's all there.
Indeed. One can even make its own (private) Tor network. It will require
a considerable amount of learning, though.
It would be inte
with the rebuild.
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Alex M (Coyo) wrote:
On 04/12/2013 11:01 PM, adrelanos wrote:
Griffin Boyce:
There's really nothing keeping you from making a private bridge network.
The documentation's all there.
Indeed. One can even make its own (priva
On 04/13/2013 12:13 AM, Mike Perry wrote:
Otherwise, thanks for your concern/veiled threats/trolling.
Because obviously criticism and actual concern for the well-being of a
foss project is always trolling and threats.
I hope you aren't a contributor.
_
On 04/13/2013 12:13 AM, Mike Perry wrote:
If you have a specific list of design flaws that aren't couched in
long rants, we can perhaps help instruct you on how you might solve
them in your redesign with Mr Disney, or at least point you toward
some tickets you two should read and follow during
On 04/13/2013 01:29 AM, Mike Perry wrote:
Thus spake Alex M (Coyo) (c...@darkdna.net):
On 04/13/2013 12:13 AM, Mike Perry wrote:
If you have a specific list of design flaws that aren't couched in
long rants, we can perhaps help instruct you on how you might
solve them in your redesign wi
On 04/13/2013 01:45 AM, Seth David Schoen wrote:
Alex M (Coyo) writes:
It concerns me that you [Mike Perry] refer to "we" as though you
contribute anything to the tor project.
https://gitweb.torproject.org/
https://www.torproject.org/torbutton/en/design/index.htm
On 04/13/2013 01:54 AM, Griffin Boyce wrote:
Alex M (Coyo) wrote:
>I must have somehow missed it.
>
>I would really appreciate a link. I cannot seem to find it on my own.
>
>Thank you in advance.
Here are the common ways: roll a bunch of bridges using Amazon's clo
I think you're right.
On 04/13/2013 04:32 AM, Gregory Disney wrote:
OnionCat? Anything more extreme than that is going to have be built from
the ground up.
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Alex M (Coyo) wrote:
On 04/13/2013 01:54 AM, Griffin Boyce wrote:
Alex M (Coyo) wrote:
&g
On 04/13/2013 05:02 AM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
On 13.04.2013 04:30, Alex M (Coyo) wrote:
Is Tor ever going to include support for isolated, independent bridge
relay communities that can host their own bridge directory authorities
I'm working on setting up (yet) another non-profit organiz
On 04/13/2013 10:27 AM, adrelanos wrote:
Alex M (Coyo):
I have still not gotten a straight answer about whether or not the
bridge community featureset has been released in the stable tor client.
It's all in there.
https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-manual.html.en
AlternateBridgeAuth
On 04/13/2013 10:29 AM, adrelanos wrote:
Alex M (Coyo):
On 04/13/2013 12:13 AM, Mike Perry wrote:
Otherwise, thanks for your concern/veiled threats/trolling.
Because obviously criticism and actual concern for the well-being of a
foss project is always trolling and threats.
I hope you aren&#
On 04/13/2013 10:35 AM, Griffin Boyce wrote:
Alex M (Coyo) wrote:
On 04/13/2013 01:54 AM, Griffin Boyce wrote:
Here are the common ways: roll a bunch of bridges using Amazon's cloud
[1], have friends/allies/interesting frenemies run bridges using Vidalia
[2], or just use a garden-va
On 04/13/2013 12:14 PM, grarpamp wrote:
I mean, most overlays out there are NOT for anonymity
Not for strong anonymity at least. Many are closes source windows blobs
and generally weighted towards filesharing and vague vpn privacy claims.
Those are definitely the ones to avoid. If you can't see
On 04/13/2013 12:17 PM, Griffin Boyce wrote:
adrelanos wrote:
Alex M (Coyo):
I have still not gotten a straight answer about whether or not the
bridge community featureset has been released in the stable tor client.
It's all in there.
https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-manual.ht
On 04/13/2013 12:32 PM, adrelanos wrote:
Alex M (Coyo):
On 04/13/2013 10:29 AM, adrelanos wrote:
Alex M (Coyo):
On 04/13/2013 12:13 AM, Mike Perry wrote:
Otherwise, thanks for your concern/veiled threats/trolling.
Because obviously criticism and actual concern for the well-being of a
foss
On 04/13/2013 12:59 PM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 01:14:16PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
Sure, i2P exists, but who wants to spin up a huge honking java virtual
machine just to participate in that relay pool?
It's actually pretty easy and can run on modest hardware as a node.
I dis
On 04/13/2013 01:59 PM, Sebastian G. wrote:
About assassinating (double ass) the (core?) Tor people
I have read that you can hire assassins on hidden-services. Wouldn't it
be ironic if one hires an assassin (or many of them) via hidden-services
to take the lives or Tor people?
That WOULD
On 04/13/2013 09:15 PM, adrelanos wrote:
Sebastian G. :
(Fun part?)
Not a fun part for me. It's sad that these concern have been raised by
a troll (or someone who doesn't know how to behave). However, these
concerns are valid, and from my perspective, I can't understand why
they are easily dism
On 04/13/2013 10:44 PM, adrelanos wrote:
Hi Gregory!
Gregory Disney:
Let's not dread on things out of our control; IMO we should use these
concerns to develop solutions then turn them into soultions that we can
implement. Obviously we can't develop around assassinations nor state
funded terrori
Since I cannot reply to anonymous remailers, I will simply post my
replies here.
Also note how I am not a coward. My IP address is right there in the
headers.
Unlike you cowards, I really don't care if you block me.
I'm forking your code and making all of you irrelevant anyway.
https://www.
34 matches
Mail list logo
