Hi,
I'm running a Tor bridge for some days now (after shutting down an exit
node, due to too many DMCA complaints) but it's hardly getting any
traffic:
Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 1 day 11:59 hours, with 2 circuits open.
I've sent 7.34 MB and received 24.86 MB.
I feel like it's configured w
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 at 08:27, Andreas Krey wrote:
> I don't think so. My bridge get similarly low usage (the
> vidalia-configured just as the hand-setup one), and given the way bridge
> addresses may be handed out, and that you explicitly need to configure
> them, that is not surprising.
But, isn'
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 at 15:34, Andreas Krey wrote:
> They are announced, just not all to the general public. You have to tell
> your tor client to use bridges; normally it directly talks to (public) relays.
You mean, people can configure their tor-enabled client just to connect to
a (public) exit-
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 at 19:21, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> Sounds like you are thinking that the last hop in the circuit is called
> the exit node, and earlier hops in the circuit are called bridges? This
> is not so.
>
> The last hop in the circuit is the exit relay. Hops other than the last
> are c
Hi,
I'm running a Tor relay on Ubuntu 15.10 and today I upgraded from 0.2.6.10
to 0.2.7.5 (0.2.7.5-1~vivid+1). Since then the Tor node starts, builds up
~280 connections - and then accepts no new connections. "telnet localhost
9001" comes back with connection refused. And in the log this infamo
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015, Christian Kujau wrote:
> I'm running a Tor relay on Ubuntu 15.10 and today I upgraded from 0.2.6.10
> to 0.2.7.5 (0.2.7.5-1~vivid+1). Since then the Tor node starts, builds up
As it turns, it has nothing to do with Tor. I tested vanilla tor-0.2.7.5
and started
