I find it curious that ~credibility~ of tor is being called into
question by some. The source is readily available, the libraries it
compiles against are readily available, the change logs, code control
records, etc. are all readily available. Certain contributors to tor
have come under fire from v
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Mike Perry wrote:
> For example: "Trust the community. So many different people have
> worked on, volunteered for, attacked, reviewed, and researched
> tor-related topics from so many different institutions and backgrounds
> that it is *the* most extensively studie
