I think that you are mostly right except that it's not uninteresting at
all for normal people to evade the banks dictatorship, delays and fees
(what are you buying with this? what for? wiretransfer will take one
week + absurd taxes not even knowing where it's coming from, etc, etc)
and except that
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 01:40:39PM +0200, Aymeric Vitte wrote:
> I think that you are mostly right except that it's not uninteresting at
> all for normal people to evade the banks dictatorship, delays and fees
> (what are you buying with this? what for? wiretransfer will take one
> week + absurd ta
On 4 September 2017 at 13:40, Aymeric Vitte wrote:
>
> I think that you are mostly right except that it's not uninteresting at
> all for normal people to evade the banks dictatorship, delays and fees
> (what are you buying with this? what for? wiretransfer will take one
> week + absurd taxes not e
On Mon, 4 Sep 2017 17:04:10 +0200
Jon Tullett wrote:
> As it happens, I just recently transferred funds internationally. It
> took 36 hours to clear, at a guaranteed rate. My local bank charged
> about $8 in fees
But that's still within Europe or the like? Internationally on a wider scale
SWIFT
> As it happens, I just recently transferred funds internationally. It
> took 36 hours to clear, at a guaranteed rate. My local bank charged
> about $8 in fees (mostly for the overhead of liaising with the local
> receiver of revenue - there's a bunch of paperwork, so I can't really
> object to the
Le 04/09/2017 à 18:04, grarpamp a écrit :
>> As it happens, I just recently transferred funds internationally. It
>> took 36 hours to clear, at a guaranteed rate. My local bank charged
>> about $8 in fees (mostly for the overhead of liaising with the local
>> receiver of revenue - there's a bunch
I don't really see people use Taler in Africa, as mentioned in my
previous email can't Stellar or Ripple do what you want?
I was talking about bitcoin contracts too, not only ethereum, contracts
don't have to be necessarily linked to money
For me the non societal aspect for btc is more due to the
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 08:35:17PM +0500, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> BTC wouldn't require "same timeframe" of 36 hours to transfer, it can be done
> within less than an hour. And with the recent developments in the BTC world,
> both transaction speed and cost per transaction will continue to improve.
On 5 September 2017 at 08:25, carlo von lynX
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 08:35:17PM +0500, Roman Mamedov wrote:
>> BTC wouldn't require "same timeframe" of 36 hours to transfer, it can be done
>> within less than an hour. And with the recent developments in the BTC world,
>> both transaction
