> With two computers connected via Ethernet through a switch, I would
> normally get ping timings of around 250 microseconds.
> However, when the computer being pinged was pegged at 100% CPU on all
> cores, _ping latency would drop to about 170 microseconds._
This is probably caused by power manag
On 14 July 2016 at 10:41, Mirimir wrote:
> There is an aspect of visiting hostile onion sites that's especially
> problematic: forcing direct clearnet connections that reveal users'
> ISP-assigned IP addresses. It's irresponsible to continue recommending
> only vulnerable setups, especially Tor b
On 16 July 2016 at 01:46, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> On 7/15/2016 12:34 AM, Jon Tullett wrote:
>>
>> On 15 July 2016 at 01:23, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
>>>
>>> You're not really suggesting that users under hostile dictatorships or
>>> ones
>>> trying to expose democratic government unconstitutional actions,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/16/2016 06:00 AM, Jon Tullett wrote:
> On 14 July 2016 at 10:41, Mirimir wrote:
>
>> There is an aspect of visiting hostile onion sites that's
>> especially problematic: forcing direct clearnet connections that
>> reveal users' ISP-assigned I
> I'm hardly asking for perfection. Just a little heads up for the sheep.
You're unwilling to even describe non-technical users as human beings,
yet you want Tor to suggest a vastly more complex alternative for them?
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/16/2016 08:21 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
>> I'm hardly asking for perfection. Just a little heads up for the
>> sheep.
> You're unwilling to even describe non-technical users as human
> beings, yet you want Tor to suggest a vastly more complex
>
