Hello,
Just a small announce (not sure if this is the right ML, sorry).
I'm developing an Android app allowing to block all IP traffic, and
force only selected app through Orbot.
This is done because neither Orbot nor AFWall (or other free, opensource
Android iptables managment interface) seem to
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 08:01:53 +0200, CJ wrote:
> Website is here: https://torrific.ch/ (yep, Switzerland, a
> not-so-against-Tor country)
> Source code is on github: https://github.com/EthACKdotOrg/Torrific
> Released under GPLv2
I wanted to help by adding it to F-Droid, but noticed that you us
Hello,
Craps… right. I just updated to v3.
I was wanting to add the app to f-droid once it's in "beta" state, alpha
is maybe a bit early (though it shouldn't block the whole network
anymore now with latest release) ;).
Thanks for the license headup, and for pushing it to f-droid — means it
may b
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 09:45:35 +0200, CJ wrote:
> I was wanting to add the app to f-droid once it's in "beta" state, alpha
> is maybe a bit early (though it shouldn't block the whole network
> anymore now with latest release) ;).
We had apps like davdroid in alpha stage for a long time, it's jus
grarpamp:
> Can't TBB also alternativly just rig the functions that report window
> size to report whatever size you tell it, regardless of actual size?
> ie 1024x768x24 .
Sure. You can report that you have a window size of 0x0 if you want. Or
42x23 or 1234x567. But the problem is a) that you want
Joe Btfsplk:
> On 7/23/2014 2:49 AM, Georg Koppen wrote:
>> Red Sonja:
>>> I'm running the latest TBB on linux32. How do I reset the window size? I
>>> moved one side by mistake and I can't set it back by hand. Each time I
>>> run it, it's the window size from the last session.
>> That should not h
CJ:
> Just a small announce (not sure if this is the right ML, sorry).
> I'm developing an Android app allowing to block all IP traffic, and
> force only selected app through Orbot.
> This is done because neither Orbot nor AFWall (or other free, opensource
> Android iptables managment interface) se
On 07/24/2014 11:20 AM, Daniel Martí wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 09:45:35 +0200, CJ wrote:
>> I was wanting to add the app to f-droid once it's in "beta" state, alpha
>> is maybe a bit early (though it shouldn't block the whole network
>> anymore now with latest release) ;).
>
> We had apps
Lunar:
> CJ:
>> Just a small announce (not sure if this is the right ML, sorry).
>> I'm developing an Android app allowing to block all IP traffic, and
>> force only selected app through Orbot.
>> This is done because neither Orbot nor AFWall (or other free, opensource
>> Android iptables managment
On 07/24/2014 01:23 PM, u wrote:
> Lunar:
>> CJ:
>>> Just a small announce (not sure if this is the right ML, sorry).
>>> I'm developing an Android app allowing to block all IP traffic, and
>>> force only selected app through Orbot.
>>> This is done because neither Orbot nor AFWall (or other free,
* on the Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 08:01:53AM +0200, CJ wrote:
> Just a small announce (not sure if this is the right ML, sorry).
> I'm developing an Android app allowing to block all IP traffic, and
> force only selected app through Orbot.
> This is done because neither Orbot nor AFWall (or other free
From: tor-talk-requ...@lists.torproject.org
Subject: tor-talk Digest, Vol 42, Issue 79
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 06:24:31 +
Send tor-talk mailing list submissions to
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, vis
On 07/24/2014 02:38 PM, Mike Cardwell wrote:
> * on the Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 08:01:53AM +0200, CJ wrote:
>
>> Just a small announce (not sure if this is the right ML, sorry).
>> I'm developing an Android app allowing to block all IP traffic, and
>> force only selected app through Orbot.
>> This is
CJ:
> On 07/24/2014 01:23 PM, u wrote:
>> Lunar:
>>> CJ:
Just a small announce (not sure if this is the right ML, sorry).
I'm developing an Android app allowing to block all IP traffic, and
force only selected app through Orbot.
This is done because neither Orbot nor AFWall (or
http://blog.exodusintel.com/2014/07/23/silverbullets_and_fairytails/
SILVER BULLETS AND FAIRY TAILS
Introduction
This week we made mention on Twitter of a zero-day vulnerability we’ve
unearthed that affects the popular Tails operating system. As the Tails website
states:
Tails is a live opera
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 09:43:50PM -0400, krishna e bera wrote:
:Tor Project had to refuse funding from a donor who was deemed some kind
:of enemy of the US govt[1]. This should raise suspicions that the
:project may not be developing in its most productive direction(s) for
:the other parties tha
On 07/24/2014 03:54 PM, u wrote:
> CJ:
>> On 07/24/2014 01:23 PM, u wrote:
>>> Lunar:
CJ:
> Just a small announce (not sure if this is the right ML, sorry).
> I'm developing an Android app allowing to block all IP traffic, and
> force only selected app through Orbot.
> This is
On 7/24/2014 3:58 AM, Georg Koppen wrote:
Joe Btfsplk:
Should TBB always start in partial window size?
It depends on your available screen size. But in almost all cases, yes,
TBB should always start in partial window size at least until we find a
good way to deal with maximized browser windows
Hello experts!
TAILS, running by usb stick, protect me against forensics tecnics in my pc. Ok.
TOR, running as a client only or as a relay, protect (theoretically) my
privacy. Ok.
But... if my static IP, provided by my ISP, is under surveillance by a legal
requirement, what kind of data they
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/24/2014 8:24 PM, Marcos Eugenio Kehl wrote:
>
>
>
> Hello experts! TAILS, running by usb stick, protect me against
> forensics tecnics in my pc. Ok. TOR, running as a client only or as
> a relay, protect (theoretically) my privacy. Ok. But... i
Marcos Eugenio Kehl writes:
> Hello experts!
> TAILS, running by usb stick, protect me against forensics tecnics in my pc.
> Ok.
> TOR, running as a client only or as a relay, protect (theoretically) my
> privacy. Ok.
> But... if my static IP, provided by my ISP, is under surveillance by a lega
Looks like a classified noforn 'contest', $5500 app fee.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Anton Nesterov
Date: Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:15 AM
Subject: Russia open procurement for report on deanonymization of Tor users
To: cypherpu...@cpunks.org
It's tender by "Special equipment and
Patrick Schleizer:
> Артур Истомин:
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:17:14PM +, Patrick Schleizer wrote:
>>> Nice graphic. Looks similar for any country! Exponential growth of
>>> debts. But not because mainly more and more money is wasted, it is the
>>> money system itself that is broken. One of
On 14-07-24 01:51 PM, s7r wrote:
> Using Tor will encrypt your data totally with multiple layers, this
> means that your ISP can see that you are using Tor, and nothing more.
> They can't see what sites you visit, what data you download,
> intercept, modify or alter the data you download, can't see
They will know that you are using Tor, but not what you are doing with Tor.
Check this nice overview: https://www.eff.org/pages/tor-and-https
You can click the buttons and see what everyone knows about you.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Marcos Eugenio Kehl
wrote:
>
>
>
> Hello experts!
> TAI
http://blog.coinkite.com/post/92733188841/coinkite-has-an-onion-for-tor
http://gcvqzacplu4veul4.onion/
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
With the recent discussion about what your ISP can see when you use Tor,
I ended up on the Tor Bridges page. On that page is the following statement:
"I need an alternative way of getting bridges!
Another way to get bridges is to send an email to
brid...@torproject.org. Please note that you must
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 03:24:26PM -0500, Cypher wrote:
> In light of the last year of disclosures by Edward Snowden, why is Tor
> requiring that I establish an account with an email provider that is
> completely out of my control and has a general history of complying with
> law enforcement data r
On 07/24/2014 02:36 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 03:24:26PM -0500, Cypher wrote:
>> In light of the last year of disclosures by Edward Snowden, why is Tor
>> requiring that I establish an account with an email provider that is
>> completely out of my control and has a gener
Food for thought: How much do you think it would cost per email to have
the same thing (collecting a heap of bridges) done via Mechanical Turk,
etc.?
On 07/24/2014 05:16 PM, Mirimir wrote:
> On 07/24/2014 02:36 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 03:24:26PM -0500, Cypher wrote:
On 07/24/2014 03:29 PM, mal wrote:
> Food for thought: How much do you think it would cost per email to have
> the same thing (collecting a heap of bridges) done via Mechanical Turk,
> etc.?
I suspect that Google and Yahoo require cellphone text confirmation for
multiple account attempts from a si
On 07/24/2014 05:54 PM, Mirimir wrote:
> I suspect that Google and Yahoo require cellphone text confirmation for
> multiple account attempts from a single IP address. There are
> workarounds, but there's more required than cheap labor.
Correct, but if a million people in your developing country of
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 6:09 PM, rysiek wrote:
> Dnia środa, 23 lipca 2014 17:24:22 grarpamp pisze:
>> Snowden triggers flood of Crapware [was: Gruveo, more secure skype?]
I'll fork this one off to the Tor folks...
> Here, have a chuckle:
> https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/icloak/icloak-tm-s
Is a tender to perform research "study the possibility of obtaining
technical information about users (user equipment) TOR anonymous network,"
cipher "TOP (Navy)"
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 6:09 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> Looks like a classified noforn 'contest', $5500 app fee.
>
> -- Forwarded
On 14-07-24 06:29 PM, ideas buenas wrote:
> I don't trust Gmail nor Yahoo. Roger, found another way. No excuses, please.
I am curious why Riseup.net isnt in the list of popular and relatively
secure email providers. Also there must be several large european and
asian free email providers, but som
I don't trust Gmail nor Yahoo. Roger, found another way. No excuses, please.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 9:59 PM, mal wrote:
> On 07/24/2014 05:54 PM, Mirimir wrote:
> > I suspect that Google and Yahoo require cellphone text confirmation for
> > multiple account attempts from a single IP address. T
On 07/24/2014 03:59 PM, mal wrote:
> On 07/24/2014 05:54 PM, Mirimir wrote:
>> I suspect that Google and Yahoo require cellphone text confirmation for
>> multiple account attempts from a single IP address. There are
>> workarounds, but there's more required than cheap labor.
>
> Correct, but if a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone up for making a proposal for it, getting the money and then
donating it back to Tor Project to fix the exact idea you raised with
the money they just given you? That'd be a laugh!
On 24/07/2014 23:22, ideas buenas wrote:
> Is a tender to perfor
Cypher:
> With the recent discussion about what your ISP can see when you use Tor,
> I ended up on the Tor Bridges page. On that page is the following statement:
>
> "I need an alternative way of getting bridges!
>
> Another way to get bridges is to send an email to
> brid...@torproject.org. Plea
ideas buenas:
> I don't trust Gmail nor Yahoo.
Okay.
> Roger, found another way.
You probably mean "Roger, find another way!" - which I would find offensive.
> No excuses, please.
This is offensive.
Nevertheless, on topic...
Go for private bridges. You must set it up. Someone else should do
I work on the Thali project [1] which depends on being able to host hidden
services on Android, Linux, Mac and Windows. We wrote an open source library to
help us host a Tor OP that that we thought would be useful to the general
community - https://github.com/thaliproject/Tor_Onion_Proxy_Library
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:29:49PM +, ideas buenas wrote:
> I don't trust Gmail nor Yahoo. Roger, found another way. No excuses, please.
>
This actually has very little to do with trust, and (as Roger said)
these providers were chosen because of the difficulty of creating new
accounts. Out of
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 06:37:27PM -0400, krishna e bera wrote:
> On 14-07-24 06:29 PM, ideas buenas wrote:
> > I don't trust Gmail nor Yahoo. Roger, found another way. No excuses, please.
>
> I am curious why Riseup.net isnt in the list of popular and relatively
> secure email providers. Also th
On 7/24/2014 9:38 PM, Matthew Finkel wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:29:49PM +, ideas buenas wrote:
I don't trust Gmail nor Yahoo. Roger, found another way. No excuses, please.
This actually has very little to do with trust, and (as Roger said)
these providers were chosen because of the
On 07/24/2014 08:38 PM, Matthew Finkel wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:29:49PM +, ideas buenas wrote:
>> I don't trust Gmail nor Yahoo. Roger, found another way. No excuses, please.
>>
>
> This actually has very little to do with trust, and (as Roger said)
> these providers were chosen bec
On 07/24/2014 09:28 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
>
> On 7/24/2014 9:38 PM, Matthew Finkel wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:29:49PM +, ideas buenas wrote:
>>> I don't trust Gmail nor Yahoo. Roger, found another way. No excuses,
>>> please.
>>>
>> This actually has very little to do with trust, an
46 matches
Mail list logo
