On 11-03-14 18:36, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>> The line got upgraded and I allowed more tor bandwidth. (over 100 KB/s)
>> Still the traffic is absent.
>> Why?
>
> Which relay is this?
The main reason is perhaps that the node is not recognised as Fast.
After checking the blutmagie status it shows n
On 11-03-14 18:36, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>> The line got upgraded and I allowed more tor bandwidth. (over 100 KB/s)
>> Still the traffic is absent.
>> Why?
>
> Which relay is this?
1d1dnt3d1tth3c0nf1g
Other tor status sites list it as Fast, though...
Udo
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@
Am 2014-03-12 09:04, schrieb Udo van den Heuvel:
> On 11-03-14 18:36, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>>> The line got upgraded and I allowed more tor bandwidth. (over 100 KB/s)
>>> Still the traffic is absent.
>>> Why?
>>
>> Which relay is this?
>
> The main reason is perhaps that the node is not recogni
On 12-03-14 10:58, Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
> On 11-03-14 18:36, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>>> The line got upgraded and I allowed more tor bandwidth. (over 100 KB/s)
>>> Still the traffic is absent.
>>> Why?
>>
>> Which relay is this?
>
> 1d1dnt3d1th3c0nf1g
>
> Other tor status sites list it as F
Tor Weekly News March 12th, 2014
Welcome to the tenth issue of Tor Weekly News in 2014, the weekly
newsletter th
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 06:43:31PM +, Gordon Morehouse wrote:
> I have been doing some testing of sending email over Tor and today ran
> into a definite BadExit (but not flagged, clearly) because there was a
> blatant MitM attempt on three separate occasions when I initiated a
> TLS/SSL SMTP co
Through the German Working Group on Data Retention (AK Vorrat)
I'm involved with the organisation of a protest weekend against
mass surveillance on 2014-04-12 in Cologne, Germany:
http://cologne.stopwatchingus.info/demo-12-april/en.html
Obviously this would be a good opportunity for Tor advocacy,
Recently my tor browser crashed and mistakenly clicked the restore
option when the browser came back up only to lose all the noscript
settings. A fresh copy was installed into a new folder so the old one
is thankfully intact. Does anyone know what the file is that stores
those options and where t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/12/2014 03:15 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 03:13:42PM -0500, Cypher wrote:
>> Is there a way to control the number of hops that Tor makes? For
>> example, if I wanted to increase or decrease the default number?
>
> Fi
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 03:13:42PM -0500, Cypher wrote:
> Is there a way to control the number of hops that Tor makes? For
> example, if I wanted to increase or decrease the default number?
First you should learn about anonymity, entry guards, and end-to-end
correlation attacks. You probably shoul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Is there a way to control the number of hops that Tor makes? For
example, if I wanted to increase or decrease the default number?
Thanks!
Cypher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIcBA
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:58:15AM +0100, Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
> On 11-03-14 18:36, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> >> The line got upgraded and I allowed more tor bandwidth. (over 100 KB/s)
> >> Still the traffic is absent.
> >> Why?
> >
> > Which relay is this?
>
> 1d1dnt3d1tth3c0nf1g
>
> Other
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:58:15AM +0100, Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
> > On 11-03-14 18:36, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> > >> The line got upgraded and I allowed more tor bandwidth. (over 100
> KB/s)
> > >> Still the traffic is absent.
> > >
13 matches
Mail list logo
