On Monday 10 March 2014 19:37:25 grarpamp wrote:
> > http://cryptome.org/2013/09/tor-analysis-hidden-services.pdf
>
> Do you seriously think that reporters, aid workers, freedom
> fighters, investigators, whistleblowers, and simple chatfriends,
> etc are going to publish their onions for all to se
On 03/10/14 13:11, Guido Witmond wrote:
> On 03/09/14 20:25, Erinn Clark wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> In September last year I discovered a fake key for my torproject.org email
>> address[1]. Today I discovered another one:
>>
>> pub 2048R/C458C590 2014-02-13 [expires: 2018-02-13]
>> 1. That is
I think the thinking needs re-thinking. Tor becomes less and less useful, and
less and less attractive to users as more and more sites block tor. The
diminishing returns feeds itself. More people quit using tor because many or
most of the sites they are interested in prevent them from viewing
Use services that don't block Tor. Tell the other operator why you are
leaving. Ask admins or poke any adress you find from a website that is
important to you, that blocks us, why they are doing so. Tell your
friends to use TBB, it's awesome how useable is it nowadays. They should
just "click t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
grarpamp:
> ... seems to have changed its advisory format for blocking you from
> *reading* their site. Note the 't', for Tor?, and shorter 4 digit
> length which I've elided for now. If anyone has made direct talk
> with Craigslist regarding their r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
grarpamp:
>> how to quickly find out what exit was being used so I can tattle
>> on it
>
> controller usefeature extended_events usefeature verbose_names
> getinfo stream-status getinfo circuit-status setevents stream
> setevents circ
Thanks...
On 15-12-12 17:53, Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
>> First, thanks for running a relay. A 32KB relay is still plenty
>> valid. ssh, irc, instant messenger, most web browsing, and the operate
>> just fine within 32KB/s bandwidth.
>>
>> For those with a networking background, this is 256 Kbps. This is sti
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 06:08:43PM +0100, Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
> On 15-12-12 17:53, Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
> >> First, thanks for running a relay. A 32KB relay is still plenty
> >> valid. ssh, irc, instant messenger, most web browsing, and the operate
> >> just fine within 32KB/s bandwidth.
> Based on my experiences with the (terrible) Craigslist spam ghosting
> algo, attempting to get help for that over the random junk I was
> legitimately trying to sell which got me ghosted, and then doing a lot
> of research on similar problems had by other users...
>
> ...which led me to reading a
Public response to a private message
On 03/11/14 16:35, (..xxx..) wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-03-11 at 13:30 +0100, Guido Witmond wrote:
>> With DNSSEC and DANE, we have that missing link. DANE allows site
>> operators to specify what CA they use for their site. It could be
>> allows to set up your ow
> If I understand you correctly, you basically state that their
> data does not match the underlying set.
I erred in threading the link as part of that reply, which was meant
to prior talk on what a casual surfer/reporter might see and surmise
about hidden services.
The paper... is good. But mayb
11 matches
Mail list logo
