On 19.08.2013 05:31, ITechGeek wrote:
>>> PGP mails, and I'm thinking about enforcing TLS.
> If you enforce TLS, you won't be able to send/receive email for many
> domains.
Yes.
I want to have a script that scans all incoming mail for the used cipher
and in the case of a weak, non-PFS cipher, or
On 8/19/13, 5:52 PM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
On 19.08.2013 05:31, ITechGeek wrote:
PGP mails, and I'm thinking about enforcing TLS.
If you enforce TLS, you won't be able to send/receive email for many
domains.
Yes.
I want to have a script that scans all incoming mail for the used cipher
and in t
On 19.08.2013 09:58, Peter Tonoli wrote:
> To what point will this be? I'd say the majority of SMTP w/ TLS servers
> are using self-signed certificates. It's arguable whether TLS with a
> self signed certificate is any better than just plaintext.
I don't see any point in arguing about that: It is,
Il 8/19/13 10:49 AM, Moritz Bartl ha scritto:
> On 19.08.2013 09:58, Peter Tonoli wrote:
>> To what point will this be? I'd say the majority of SMTP w/ TLS servers
>> are using self-signed certificates. It's arguable whether TLS with a
>> self signed certificate is any better than just plaintext.
>
> I'd say the majority of SMTP w/ TLS servers are
> using self-signed certificates.
Which you can then can pin-on-first-sight, just like SSH, and verify
as desired, which is better than automatically trusting any CA.
Mo's stance may not be all that interoperable at first, but
it's interesting pol
Often sites I try to access w/ TBB time out almost instantly, where in
Fx (23) same page, at same time - loads OK.
The pages aren't "Tor aphobics" - as they will sometimes load in TBB.
Part could be THE IP address being used in TBB, to access a page, at
specific time. Some IPs could be on a /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- Original Message
Subject: [guardian-dev] Orbot v12.0.3 is out
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 14:18:12 -0400
From: Nathan of Guardian
To: Guardian Dev ,
guardian-al...@lists.mayfirst.org
To commemorate crossing our 1,000,000 download on
mirimir:
> On 08/18/2013 09:05 PM, mick wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 10:32:13 -0700 Gordon Morehouse
>> allegedly wrote:
>>>
>>> Your best bet if you *need* an American IP is to use a VPN.
>>>
>>
>> I'm sorry Gordon but I think this needs to be said. On a list
>> devoted to tor, recommending a
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 04:45:19 +1000
"shm...@riseup.net" allegedly wrote:
> mirimir:
> > Well, one can use a VPN service through Tor. It's doable in Whonix
> > or with ra's gateway, and maybe in Tails (with persistent storage).
> > But I believe that reduces the anonymity that Tor can provide,
> >
Hallo Tor-Devs,
considering that D-Wave now claims to have a programmable quantum
computer, wouldn't it be nice for Tor to use post-quantum cyrptography?
http://www.dwavesys.com/en/dw_homepage.html
"A full suite of software tools is included in the D-Wave TwoTM system,
ranging from all the low-l
On 08/19/2013 06:45 PM, shm...@riseup.net wrote:
> mirimir:
>> On 08/18/2013 09:05 PM, mick wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 10:32:13 -0700 Gordon Morehouse
>>> allegedly wrote:
Your best bet if you *need* an American IP is to use a VPN.
>>>
>>> I'm sorry Gordon but I think t
Same thing happened with Tor 0.2.4.16-rc , no errors in the log at all
this time, same solution.
I wasn't running alphas before 0.2.4.15-rc, just the previous stable.
- Original message -
From: Geoff Down
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Tor 0.2.4.15-rc is out --
12 matches
Mail list logo
