-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Bry8 Star:
> I think user "adrelanos" user even did not read my post, or else
> such comment you would not see posted by someone.
>
> Be very careful about such user (like "adrelanos"), who posts and
> bashes and insults others without reading or
When I comment out the ORListenAddress line things look OK.
# Listen on a port other than the one advertised in ORPort (that is,
# advertise 443 but bind to 9001).
#ORListenAddress 0.0.0.0:9001
Aug 15 06:52:50.000 [notice] Tor 0.2.4.16-rc (git-dcf6b6d7dda9ffbd)
opening log file.
Aug 15 06:52:50.0
When I attempt to connect to this bridge, I see a failure in handshaking:
Orbot is starting…
Orbot is starting…
got tor proc id: 27365
Tor process id=27365
Connecting to control port: 9051
SUCCESS connected to control port
SUCCESS authenticated to control port
Starting Tor client… complete.
adding
With the ORListenAddress line uncommented, a slightly different failure
results:
Orbot is starting…
Orbot is starting…
got tor proc id: 28490
Tor process id=28490
Connecting to control port: 9051
SUCCESS connected to control port
SUCCESS authenticated to control port
Starting Tor client… complete.
Juha Nurmi:
> OHM2013 was great and people were very interested about our search
> engine. See the presentation https://ahmia.fi/static/presentation/#(1).
Audio recording is also available at:
http://groente.puscii.nl/noisysquare-recordings/ahmia.ogg
--
Lunar
Hi All,
After reading
https://www.torproject.org/docs/pluggable-transports.html.en I'm
curious why the Pluggable Transports Tor Browser Bundle is a different
package/download than the Tor Browser Bundle? As we can see on for
example
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/pluggable-transports-bundl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
> I'll wait for the update, hopefully it'll come with the option to
> configure the Tor port,
Well, that option is already there in Torbirdy's preferences.
What will probably change is the default SOCKSPort Torbirdy is trying
to connect out of the
==tldr (Too Long, Didn't Read)
Where will Tor's bandwidth come from in 20 years? Will solo volunteers
still exist, or will all the bandwidth come from Tor-friendly
organizations?
Tor incentive schemes are interesting. There are many proposed schemes
but their crypto needs to be reviewed and lots
Overall I like the idea, since it forces no one to participate. Nodes
not interested in getting bitcoin donations, just don't get any.
What about bridges? Any way to reward them as well?
George Kadianakis:
> As a simplified example, if the Tor network has 4 relays with
> bandwidth contribution 0.
Hi,
In some way, this is what we are planning to do with torservers.net,
right? We take donations via any channel (including Bitcoin), and
distribute them across all participating organizations based on, in the
current model, advertised bandwidth and a country-specific factor.
It is definitely mo
From: Gordon Morehouse wrote
> Edgar S:
>> > The function of Tormail I need that suggested solutions don't seem
>> > to have is the ability to receive and reply to clear text ordinary
>> > Email sent from a non-secure SMTP.
>>
>
> This is a dealbreaker. It has to have this.
>
>
> ...
>
>
All of the ports respond on the external IP except for 443 but I can
connect via SSL on 9001. I don't understand how ORListenAddress is supposed
to work: my bridge times out on 443 but when I comment out the ORListenAddress
line it doesn't connect via obfsproxy at all.
Please advise.
On Thu, Aug
-tor-relay
+tor-relays
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:13 AM, lee colleton wrote:
> All of the ports respond on the external IP except for 443 but I can
> connect via SSL on 9001. I don't understand how ORListenAddress is
> supposed to work: my bridge times out on 443 but when I comment out the
> O
Hi,
Is there any way to "torify" applications so they can reach .onion URLs,
but everything else does not use Tor but connects directly?
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsusbscribe or change other settings go to
https://li
On 15.08.2013 20:59, David Goulet wrote:
> I guess that could be an option useful to add to torsocks for that. As of now,
> with the current version of torsocks (1.3.x), you can't.
>
> We could add something like "torsocks --only-onion" ... ?
That would be great, yes!
--
Moritz Bartl
https://ww
I guess that could be an option useful to add to torsocks for that. As of now,
with the current version of torsocks (1.3.x), you can't.
We could add something like "torsocks --only-onion" ... ?
Thanks!
David
Moritz Bartl:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any way to "torify" applications so they can reach .on
Thank you,
I was referring to add the capability for the user to change the
SocksPort in the "recommended proxy settings" (at least at the config
editor), not in the "Use custom proxy setting", where is too clear it
can be changed.
Cheers,
Gerardo
I'll wait for the update, hopefully it'll
You could use torify, especially if you're not necessarily seeking
anonymity, but instead just ("JUST") resolving .onions.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Tor#Torify
David Goulet wrote:
> I guess that could be an option useful to add to torsocks for that. As of now,
> with the current versio
Gerardo:
> I was referring to add the capability for the user to change the
> SocksPort in the "recommended proxy settings" (at least at the config
> editor), not in the "Use custom proxy setting", where is too clear it
> can be changed.
I don't know why you want to change it through the config ed
Hi,
Our crowdfunding campaign will run another 11 days, and I hope we can
(at least!) break 3000 Euro. The money will be split and equal shares
will be given to all torservers.net "partners" for Tor exit operation.
http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/tor-anti-censorship-and-anonymity-infrastructure
20 matches
Mail list logo
