> I think instead of inventing torsocks it would have been much better if
> there was a Tor connection library and applications could easily use it.
Preload (as in torsocks) was invented to hook the network system calls
for apps where there was no socks5 support. Expecting an app developer
to code
1) I attended WPES and the first day of CCS:
http://hatswitch.org/wpes2012/
http://www.sigsac.org/ccs/CCS2012/
There are a bunch of new Tor-related research papers:
- "Changing of the Guards: A Framework for Understanding and Improving
Entry Guard Selection in Tor"
http://freehaven.net/an
Hi all, I have two suggestions regarding the start-tor-browser script.
First, the tarballs should expand in to distinct directories.
Currently tor-browser-gnu-linux-i686-2.2.39-5-dev-en-US.tar.gz and
tor-browser-gnu-linux-x86_64-2.2.39-5-dev-en-US.tar.gz both expand to
tor-browser_en-US. This is
On Mon, 3 Dec 2012 12:04:33 +0100
Aaron Webster wrote:
> Hi all, I have two suggestions regarding the start-tor-browser script.
>
> First, the tarballs should expand in to distinct directories.
> Currently tor-browser-gnu-linux-i686-2.2.39-5-dev-en-US.tar.gz and
> tor-browser-gnu-linux-x86_64-2.
Dear All,
I would like to know, How can we know recently bandwidth observed of relays?
I try to find on torstatus.blutmagie.de and torstatus.all.de
both of them, give different information about recent write/read
bandwidth history. and also, both of them give information not actual
information
On 12/3/12 3:20 PM, Maimun Rizal wrote:
> I would like to know, How can we know recently bandwidth observed of
> relays?
> I try to find on torstatus.blutmagie.de and torstatus.all.de
>
> both of them, give different information about recent write/read
> bandwidth history.
In theory, those two si
Am 03.12.2012 15:20, schrieb Maimun Rizal:
>
> I would like to know, How can we know recently bandwidth observed of
> relays?
> I try to find on torstatus.blutmagie.de and torstatus.all.de
>
> both of them, give different information about recent write/read
> bandwidth history. and also, both of
grarpamp:
>> I think instead of inventing torsocks it would have been much
>> better if there was a Tor connection library and applications
>> could easily use it.
>
> Preload (as in torsocks) was invented to hook the network system
> calls for apps where there was no socks5 support. Expecting an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/02/2012 10:18 AM, t...@lists.grepular.com wrote:
> Standard MySQL replication should work over Tor without issue.
For what it's worth, I'm going to be trying MongoDB and CouchDB
replication over Tor in a couple of days.
- --
The Doctor [412/7
On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 20:58:10 +
adrelanos wrote:
> I think if a Tor library and instructions how to design a protocol
> and/or application Tor-safe from scratch would have been created in
> past, we wouldn't have this "protocol review" mess now.
Yeah, until somebody links with your Tor librar
> On the other hand the "protocol audit" mess is even worse.
This 'mess' doesn't seem to have anything to do with Tor,
nor is it Torproject's responsibility to do any such audit
on any app other than Tor itself, or by extension those it
maintains or chooses to partner with.
As said before, torsoc
11 matches
Mail list logo
