On 11/3/12 4:09 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> I hope to test some clearnet 2 hop VPN service with double
> encryption to feel that part.
I thin that also one-hop works and that in general Tor is too restricted
given it's threat model.
Generally my feeling is that Tor should "evolve" into something more
fl
Hi,
Matthew Finkel wrote (03 Nov 2012 03:10:53 GMT) :
> On 11/02/2012 07:36 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>> If Robert wants someone to maintain it, I'd be happy to do so.
> I saw this thread earlier but didn't have a chance to reply. I was
> thinking about volunteering to patch it up and maintain
On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 22:10:36 -0600
Mason Mack wrote:
> Some of the mistakes I made are from following "canned solutions",
> which is reckless, but I'd rather make all of the mistakes I can
> before I actually come to need such important security measures as
> Tor. All in all, this setup will allo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello,
I wonder if someone knows more about the team that is behind Tormail.
I see a lot of people using this service and I would like to have an idea
about how much I could trust the Tormail admins to not read / expose my
communications.
Thank yo
intrigeri:
> Hi,
>
> Matthew Finkel wrote (03 Nov 2012 03:10:53 GMT) :
>> On 11/02/2012 07:36 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>
>>> If Robert wants someone to maintain it, I'd be happy to do so.
>
>> I saw this thread earlier but didn't have a chance to reply. I was
>> thinking about volunteering to
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> Can you give me a list of things that matter most to you in order of
> your priority? The bug list is mighty long...
inb4 incoming stream of Debian-centric patches: please be wary of
glibc differences:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?i
Matthew Finkel:
> On 11/02/2012 07:36 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>> Nick Mathewson:
>>> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:34 PM, adrelanos wrote:
Could you blog it please?
>>>
>>>
>>> I'd like to see more discussion from more people here first, and see
>>> whether somebody steps up to say, "
https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/blob/HEAD:/proposals/171-separate-streams.txt
says: IsolateSOCKSUser
https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-manual-dev.html.en
says: IsolateSOCKSAuth
Which one is correct?
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-ta
adrelanos wrote (03 Nov 2012 13:37:04 GMT) :
> Which one is correct?
$ echo "SOCKSPort 1 IsolateSOCKSUser" > /tmp/intrigeri/torrc
$ tor -f /tmp/intrigeri/torrc
[...]
[warn] Unrecognized SocksPort option '"IsolateSOCKSUser"'
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.
On 11/2/2012 10:29 PM, k e bera wrote:
I'm not sure why there would be leaks with ABP. Afaik it doesnt send
information. However it does update its blocklists which might be
language-specific, which splits the anonymity set (if i understand the
concept). Regarding use of ABP itself among non-To
Trust nobody with that data, including Tormail.
On Nov 3, 2012 4:10 AM, "HardKor" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hello,
>
> I wonder if someone knows more about the team that is behind Tormail.
>
> I see a lot of people using this service and I would like to have a
>> I hope to test some clearnet 2 hop VPN service with double
>> encryption to feel that part.
> I thin that also one-hop works
Since Tor would not be of benefit there, I must assume there is
confusion and ask people to... please get the definitions right:
HOP = An action you take, a river you m
> Trust nobody with that data, including Tormail.
Yes. Not Tormail, not Gmail, not Katz, not GMX, not any mail.
Your job is to encrypt your mail body and to use encrypted
end protocols. And hopefully to choose providers that use TLS
to talk to the providers of your correspondants so that the
non-b
>> Can you give me a list of things that matter most to you in order of
>> your priority? The bug list is mighty long...
>
> inb4 incoming stream of Debian-centric patches: please be wary of
> glibc differences:
And wary that Linux/GNU mod Debian is not the only OS that has
current users. The BSD'
Hello,
Sorry to bother you,
I have try to get the fingerprint ($ with 40 caracters) of the "Unamed"
nickname , with no success,
I think there is a way to calculate it, but i don't how to do that ?
Does someone know how to do that ?
Thank you,
Alex
_
Using Win TBB 2.2.39-5. Noticed a popup from Tor, saying a particular
port was being used by an application that could leak info. Besides
that SAME port #, that many pop ups repeatedly mentioned, noticed many
similar warnings in the Tor log.
Investigated several "warning" addresses in my FW
On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 21:05:38 +, lacorov affiliate amazon wrote:
...
> I have try to get the fingerprint ($ with 40 caracters) of the "Unamed"
> nickname , with no success,
> I think there is a way to calculate it, but i don't how to do that ?
There is no way to do that; otherwise all the hun
Follow up. Noticed that almost every address listed as a WARNING in Tor
log, as _possibly leaking my destination_, was the address of a relay
that was in process of or had just been closed - best I could tell.
For the last relay in the network map list, the addresses building, then
immediatel
> I have try to get the fingerprint ($ with 40 caracters) of the "Unamed"
> nickname , with no success,
> I think there is a way to calculate it, but i don't how to do that ?
>
> Does someone know how to do that ?
Hi Alex. I'm not entirely sure what you're trying to ask, but if
you're wondering h
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Matthew Finkel wrote:
> On 11/02/2012 07:36 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> > Nick Mathewson:
> >> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:34 PM, adrelanos wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Could you blog it please?
> >>
> >>
> >> I'd like to see more discussion from more people here first,
On 11/03/2012 08:38 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Matthew Finkel
> wrote:
>
>> On 11/02/2012 07:36 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>>> Nick Mathewson:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:34 PM, adrelanos wrote:
>
>
> Could you blog it please?
I'd li
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Matthew Finkel wrote:
> On 11/03/2012 08:38 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>
[...]
> > Okay, sounds like we've got some enthusiasm. Let's get started. I
> > volunteer to review commits and if people ask me to, and suggest that
> > asking me to review stuff for a whi
22 matches
Mail list logo
