On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:03:59PM +, adrelanos wrote:
> A new law proposing to make Tor and similar software illegal in US would
> be a damn hard hit against Tor. And the other remaining "free" countries
> can establish similar laws. No more "free" countries = no more Tor.
No more legal Tor,
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Ted Smith wrote:
> What did that commenter do? They don't say.
>
> Further, "get an idea" isn't "statistics".
Where did I talk about exit node statistics? I mentioned the
possibility of gathering .onion access statistics.
> No, but I'd rather say nothing than say
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 00:47:26 +, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
...
> are stupid? As I said, it detracts from the project's credibility.
> Anyone who installs Tor (or I2P, for that matter) and explores the
> hidden services,
Erm, how *do* you 'explore' hidden services? After all, they are
not indexed by
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Andreas Krey wrote:
> Erm, how *do* you 'explore' hidden services?
The Hidden Wiki [1] is (or are, there have been several alternates) a
good start. It used to be down quite often after some kids tried to
play in vigilantism on Tor network, but seems quite stable
Sorry for the rant.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012, at 23:47, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
> Anyone who installs Tor (or I2P, for that matter) and explores the
> hidden services, immediately sees the overwhelmingly illegal (mostly,
> since it depends on jurisdiction) content. Anyone who runs an exit
> node immediat
Eugen Leitl:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:03:59PM +, adrelanos wrote:
>
>> A new law proposing to make Tor and similar software illegal in US would
>> be a damn hard hit against Tor. And the other remaining "free" countries
>> can establish similar laws. No more "free" countries = no more Tor.
On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 09:54 +0300, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Ted Smith wrote:
> > What did that commenter do? They don't say.
> >
> > Further, "get an idea" isn't "statistics".
>
> Where did I talk about exit node statistics? I mentioned the
> possibility of gatherin
Ted Smith:
>> So far you didn't say anything useful or non-obvious, so why did you
>> post? You didn't like someone's written experience, so he is
>> automatically a troll or a false flag — fine, bring your own
>> references.
>
> I don't have to "bring my own references" to point out that the only
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012 07:23:46 -0400
grarpamp wrote:
> Tor cannot accept known 'illegal' money, therefore acknowledgement
> is moot. About the best Tor could do is be able to accept anonymous
> donations in the first place. Then publish a bitcoin address for
> donations from anyone. Then surely some
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 3:52 PM, wrote:
> This is a followup post on this issue which persists in Linux TBB 32bit,
> version 2.2.37-2.
>
> Any idea for the cause?
>
> What occurs when it doesn't list the library loading (is the library
> loading?) and why it's listed
> only on a TBB reload?
>
>
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Ted Smith wrote:
> How would you do that without facing the same problem as someone
> wiretapping their own exit node? Do you have a CP classifier? Are you
> going to load each .onion and manually verify if it contains CP? How are
> you going to aggregate that into
Maxim Kammerer:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Ted Smith wrote:
>> How would you do that without facing the same problem as someone
>> wiretapping their own exit node? Do you have a CP classifier? Are you
>> going to load each .onion and manually verify if it contains CP? How are
>> you going t
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 2:23 AM, adrelanos wrote:
> That wouldn't prove what Tor is used for most.
> .onion is only a part of Tor. 1% or 99%? Who can know that?
Now *that* can actually be measured at RV points, and I think should
be a part of Tor metrics. I suspect that the ratio is much closer t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Introduction:
There are not only technical attacks against the Tor network. Another
strong attack against Tor are legal attacks (i.e. attacking with laws,
not saying the attack is legal). The adversary tries to put Tor into
the worst light and tries
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 05:39:29PM +, adrelanos wrote:
Sorry for the delay but it is august.
> > I read these articles but at this time I don't think they will apply to my
> > situation because this is a "friendly" one.
>
> I don't understand.
I don't really need a captive portal becaus
15 matches
Mail list logo
