On 7/21/12, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 08:09:42AM +0200, machine wrote:
>> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/all.html
>>
>> but there hasn't been any update yet for The Tor Browser Bundle, which
>> has a Tor Browser version of 10.0.5.
>
> Yep. I believe TBB
Hi Jake,
> > Understanding is the key to security, not convenience. That being
> > said, TorBirdy is both convenient and great. I'm not sure that's
> > it's ready for primetime yet, but I do try to test and feed back
> > (using another nym ...) and definitely see the value.
> >
>
> Happy to help
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Robert Ransom wrote:
> * How long will you wait for the QA process before making this
> security-fix release available to users?
fwiw; I have not received an email from Erinn about tor-0.2.2.37-2,
which means our QA testers haven't heard about it either.
--
Runa
Den 19-07-2012 15:33, adrelanos skrev:
> grarpamp:
>>> Why don't we propose a clean solution for this time mess anyway?
>>
>> Is this that big of a deal? If a would be Tor user doesn't know
>> what time it is and/or can't set their clock manually, they've got
>> bigger issues to worry about.
>>
>>
Katya Titov:
> Hi Jake,
>
>>> Understanding is the key to security, not convenience. That being
>>> said, TorBirdy is both convenient and great. I'm not sure that's
>>> it's ready for primetime yet, but I do try to test and feed back
>>> (using another nym ...) and definitely see the value.
>>>
>>
Hello,
I happened to see some hidden service name resolution that torsocks was giving
as 127.0.69.0 which I never read about, so I telnetted to it and it's like
another entrance point to Tor, or at least my hidden services(?). I'm a little
confused. Can anyone clarify?
Followup question- is th
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Hansen Jay wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I happened to see some hidden service name resolution that torsocks was
> giving as 127.0.69.0 which I never read about, so I telnetted to it and it's
> like another entrance point to Tor, or at least my hidden services(?). I'm a
>
fyi
[ EU / Blocking / TOR ]
==
European Commission net neutrality consultation excludes TOR users
==
Brussels, 23 July 2012 -- The European Commission blocks TOR users'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
> It's a bit difficult to describe succinctly, but I'll try to relay
> my thoughts ...
>
> It's about the indications that you are actually using Tor.
Thank you for your feedback.
I'll write my follow-up answer directly to the trac entry.
-B
>From what I recall, some mapping of these addresses is
required fo make FTP work. I also remember FTP working
without that with the old tsocks, and not with torsocks. But
it's been so long that even I must consider my own memory
as rumor.
___
tor-talk ma
10 matches
Mail list logo
