[tor-talk] TBB 2.2.36-1 fails to include Firefox 13

2012-06-07 Thread ming
The blog: https://blog.torproject.org/blog/new-tor-browser-bundles-18 states: New Tor Browser Bundles The Tor Browser Bundles and other packages have all been updated to the latest Tor 0.2.2.36 stable version. https://www.torproject.org/download Tor Browser Bundle (2.2.36-1) Update Tor to 0.2

Re: [tor-talk] TBB 2.2.36-1 fails to include Firefox 13

2012-06-07 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 06:12:02AM -, m...@tormail.org wrote: > * Why was FF13 not included in this release? * Well, because it just came out, for one. Every new Firefox release these days includes a pile of new privacy disasters that Mike is scrambling to keep up with. You might like https:

[tor-talk] TOR Nodes

2012-06-07 Thread Maimun Rizal
Hi all, I would like to know, is there possibility to use just only one node in tor network? I just think about to use middle node is vpn. so the concept caller tor node - vpn server - tor node -- callee if there is possibility, how to configure it? I have try to use two node

Re: [tor-talk] TOR Nodes

2012-06-07 Thread tor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/06/12 11:38, Maimun Rizal wrote: > Hi all, I would like to know, is there possibility to use just only > one node in tor network? I just think about to use middle node is > vpn. so the concept > > caller tor node - vpn server - tor

[tor-talk] Repercussion from turning every Tor user into a hidden service?

2012-06-07 Thread proper
Would it stress the network too much, if everyone had a HiddenServicePort enabled? (For example, TBB or Tails were in the position to enable it for loads of users by default.) Would it improve the anonymity of people who really have hidden servers, if everyone had a hidden service running? Doe

Re: [tor-talk] Repercussion from turning every Tor user into a hidden service?

2012-06-07 Thread Matthew Kaufman
Great questions. And does hosting a hidden service exposé the machine to penetration attacks? Matt On Thursday, June 7, 2012, wrote: > Would it stress the network too much, if everyone had a HiddenServicePort > enabled? (For example, TBB or Tails were in the position to enable it for > loads of