On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:06 PM, ed1vel1 wrote:
> I have been running a non exit relay for over a year. I have found that
> my ISP and/or blacklisting services seem to block my dynamic IP on some
> sites, and that this increases over time, after the IP is reset.
>
> I decided to try running the A
:New{HU-XP-x86}5120048!5120...@doink-b9c30a60.tor-node.info JOIN :#arXXn#
IRC.Mixtape.Net
The above lines were taken from a bot's communiication via IRC from an
executable that was foisted from a PDF exploit.
I have the full communication and obfuscated :#arXXn#.
--
Dave
Multi-AV Scanning T
On 5/16/2012 1:20 PM, Aaron Whiteman wrote:
I can no longer connect to the Tor Network. I used to be able to use it
perfectly well.
I would be very grateful for any help. I've spent several hours trying to deal
with this issue!
My ISP has either irrationally started to block Tor or there
The circuit building is definitely timing out. I'm no expert.
> Socks listener listening on port 50364
Is this correct? Shouldn't it be Socks listening on port 9050; control
listener on port 9051 - or does that matter?
> It appears that the SOCKS port is now random for the Tor Browser Bun
.iuii
Sent from my iPad
On May 18, 2012, at 11:38 AM, "David H. Lipman" wrote:
> :New{HU-XP-x86}5120048!5120...@doink-b9c30a60.tor-node.info JOIN :#arXXn#
>
> IRC.Mixtape.Net
>
>
> The above lines were taken from a bot's communiication via IRC from an
> executable that was foisted from a PD
So please ignore the previous message.
On topic: that does not look like a tor address at first glance, but I'd have
to look into it further. It looks like the address just randomly has tor in the
host name.
-Andrew
On May 18, 2012, at 11:38 AM, "David H. Lipman" wrote:
> :New{HU-XP-x86}
May I ask what ISP? Have you tried specifying bridges, or selecting the option
that says "My ISP blocks tor"?
-Andrew
On May 18, 2012, at 4:43 PM, Aaron Whiteman wrote:
> The circuit building is definitely timing out. I'm no expert.
>
>> Socks listener listening on port 50364
> Is this corre
From: "Andrew Lewis"
So please ignore the previous message.
On topic: that does not look like a tor address at first glance, but I'd
have to look into it
further. It looks like the address just randomly has tor in the host name.
I saved the PCAP.
--
Dave
Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://
Socks listener listening on port 50364
Is this correct? Shouldn't it be Socks listening on port 9050; control
listener on port 9051 - or does that matter?
It appears that the SOCKS port is now random for the Tor Browser Bundle.
Starting when? I'm using 2.2.35-11 & the only thing in my unedited
__
_||_
\ /
\/
,--,
:Example A : Loaded via start-tor-browser script without any changes, fresh
install of current TBB:
'--'
Tor v0.2.2.35 (git-[snip]). This is experimental software. Do not rely on it
for strong anonymity.
(Running on Linux i686)
Initialized libevent version 2
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 01:46:49AM -, m...@tormail.org wrote:
>
> () Example A/Notations/Questions and fact: The OpenSSL library is not loaded
> in Vidalia's Message
> Log.
Sounds like https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/4834
Looks like nobody's going to fix it anyti
On 5/18/2012 7:55 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
Socks listener listening on port 50364
Is this correct? Shouldn't it be Socks listening on port 9050; control
listener on port 9051 - or does that matter?
It appears that the SOCKS port is now random for the Tor Browser Bundle.
Starting when? I'm using 2
12 matches
Mail list logo
