On 5/6/12, Shane wrote:
> I hope this is the right list for this. I am trying to get setup to
> freenode and have irssi sasl'd over tor, but I can't seem to get this
> enabled with SSL. I've tried using torsocks and socat.
Does Freenode's hidden service support SSL? Does it support SSL on port 6
> Does Freenode's hidden service support SSL? Does it support SSL on port 6697?
>
Yes it does. 6697, 7000, 7070 that I know of ... These are my latest tries.
// /etc/tor/torrc
User tor
PIDFile /var/run/tor/tor.pid
Log notice syslog
DataDirectory /var/lib/tor/data
# tried these as well
#HiddenS
Of what use is a bridge working off an IP address of a provider located
in, say, the US, to a client in, say, Syria? Sorry for the elementary
question. - eli
--
gpg: 0xE498E90D
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torpro
On Fri, 04 May 2012, grarpamp wrote:
> If anyone would like to volunteer for this small project, here is an
> open invitation... :)
>
> What is msmtp?
> http://msmtp.sourceforge.net/
> http://wiki.mutt.org/?LightSMTPagents/Msmtp
I'm very interested in this, using msmtp and ssh-tunnel solutions
m
> and there is also a proposal with the changes to be
> made [1]. Unfortunately, the implementation of the proposal
> hasn't started yet.
Why doesn't the proposal suggest doing it in "seemingly" natural way,
i.e., to add the possibility to specify proxy for the transport. Why
does tor need to be a
On 06/05/12 08:19, Shane wrote:
>> Does Freenode's hidden service support SSL? Does it support SSL on port
>> 6697?
>>
>
> Yes it does. 6697, 7000, 7070 that I know of ... These are my latest tries.
There's no point in adding a layer of SSL over hidden services; the
connection is already encry
I am pretty sure this is not relevant,
But can someone tell me what the HttpProxy does in torrc? Will this
forward outgoing traffic through a proxy server if it is defined for an
exit relay on others traffic?
Matt
On Sunday, May 6, 2012, Veggie Monster wrote:
> > and there is also a proposal w
On 05/06/2012 03:52 AM, Mix+TB Test wrote:
> Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> A few Tor hackers (Sukhbir, tagnar, myself, etc) are working on a plugin
>> for Thunderbird that attempts to Torify it properly. The codename for
>> now is 'torbutton-birdy' and it is based largely on the seminal
>> an
> There's no point in adding a layer of SSL over hidden services; the
> connection is already encrypted end to end.
>
I thought it was more like proxy-to-proxy leaving a small in-the-clear
gaps on the ends.
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torpro
On 06/05/12 18:02, Shane wrote:
>> There's no point in adding a layer of SSL over hidden services; the
>> connection is already encrypted end to end.
>
> I thought it was more like proxy-to-proxy leaving a small in-the-clear
> gaps on the ends.
I guess so. There's a chance that the Tor daemon is
Shane wrote:
> I thought it was more like proxy-to-proxy leaving a small in-the-clear
> gaps on the ends.
No, it's end-to-proxy for the regular Internet (where exit nodes may be
able to see your traffic) and end-to-end for hidden services.
--
Simon Nicolussi,
http://www.sinic.name/
pgp7cNkI1N
> jaro...@dyne.org says:
> I'm very interested in this,
Hi :) I think the motivation is to make the use of SOCKS with msmtp
simple. Which generally means SOCKS being added to msmtp itself.
Certainly not only for Tor, but also for biz, edu, and gov firewalls
as well. Lots of good use cases there t
With this blog entry:
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/new-tor-browser-bundles-security-release
It claims 2.2.35-11 fixes a problem posted here:
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/firefox-security-bug-proxy-bypass-current-tbbs
With Tor Browser Bundle (2.2.35-11); suite=linux installed, I read whe
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 05:30:40AM -, m...@tormail.org wrote:
> With this blog entry:
>
> https://blog.torproject.org/blog/new-tor-browser-bundles-security-release
>
> It claims 2.2.35-11 fixes a problem posted here:
>
> https://blog.torproject.org/blog/firefox-security-bug-proxy-bypass-curr
14 matches
Mail list logo
