On 3/9/11 11:58 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> Tor has currently has no facility for those users who are happy to
> have random third parties screw with their traffic to opt-into it, or
> those who would want to avoid it to opt out. This means that anything
> you to the traffic will have random inex
Hello tor-talk,
I work on the Tor packages, including the RPMs, but I don't know enough
about rpm-based systems to confidently fix this one:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/1134
Primarily I am worried about the upgrade scenario and changing groups in a way
that doesn't break previ
Hi,
On 10.03.2011 08:21, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote:
> Again, that's true only if you are damaging user's traffic and so your
> "filtering" doesn't break in any case:
> a) don't break user traffic
> b) don't break exit scanner traffic
> c) break "just some kind" of more noisy and malicious/agg
Thus spake Moritz Bartl (mor...@torservers.net):
> On 10.03.2011 08:21, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote:
> > Again, that's true only if you are damaging user's traffic and so your
> > "filtering" doesn't break in any case:
> > a) don't break user traffic
> > b) don't break exit scanner traffic
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/10/2011 09:16 AM, Erinn Clark wrote:
> I work on the Tor packages, including the RPMs, but I don't know
> enough about rpm-based systems to confidently fix this one:
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/1134
It's either looking too
Hey Marco!
* Marco Bonetti [2011:03:10 12:10 +0100]:
> > Primarily I am worried about the upgrade scenario and changing groups
> > in a way that doesn't break previous versions of the packages.
> Could you elaborate a bit on the issues?
> So far my understanding is that "--with-tor-group" shoul
On Mar 10, 2011, at 12:38 PM, Erinn Clark wrote:
Hey Marco!
* Marco Bonetti [2011:03:10 12:10 +0100]:
Primarily I am worried about the upgrade scenario and changing
groups
in a way that doesn't break previous versions of the packages.
Could you elaborate a bit on the issues?
So far my und
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/10/2011 12:38 PM, Erinn Clark wrote:
> Yes, you could just remove that. But do you need to change the group
> for all of the people who already have a _tor group created upon
> upgrade? Should you delete the group from existing systems
> altogeth
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 02:30:28PM -0500, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>
> See the discussion at
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/2325
Yeah, found this ticket right after my first mail. Was waiting to see how
the discussion ends over here before/whether considering dumping there its
r
scroo...@lavabit.com wrote:
About a year ago I began requiring any and all
Tor searches at Scroogle to use SSL. Using SSL is always
a good idea, but the main reason I did this is that the
SSL requirement discouraged script writers who didn't
know how to add this to their scripts. This policy
help
Just curious as to why Tor uses RSA-1024/AES-128, and not something like
RSA-2048/AES-256.
I suppose if keys are rotated enough, it doesn't matter much... is this
what's up with it?
--
F. Fox
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
h
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:40 PM, F. Fox wrote:
> Just curious as to why Tor uses RSA-1024/AES-128, and not something like
> RSA-2048/AES-256.
>
> I suppose if keys are rotated enough, it doesn't matter much... is this
> what's up with it?
I wrote a mail about this a few months ago:
http://archi
Hi,
On 10.03.2011 11:27, Jim wrote:
> Requiring SSL for Tor searches is all well and good, but it creates a
> problem that I haven't found a solution for: creating "bookmarks".
It's a great thing Scroogle uses POST by default. It still accepts GET
for both SSL and non-SSL, at least for me?
htt
When I run `portupgrade -a` on my server under FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE, I
have the next message of thesystem:
"---> Upgrading 'tor-devel-0.2.2.22.a' to 'tor-devel-0.2.2.22.a_2'
(security/tor-devel)
---> Building '/usr/ports/security/tor-devel'
===> Cleaning for tor-devel-0.2.2.22.a_2
===> License BS
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 19:56:26 +
Orionjur Tor-admin wrote:
> When I run `portupgrade -a` on my server under FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE, I
> have the next message of thesystem:
> "---> Upgrading 'tor-devel-0.2.2.22.a' to 'tor-devel-0.2.2.22.a_2'
> (security/tor-devel)
> ---> Building '/usr/ports/secur
Tor 0.2.2.23-alpha lets relays record their bandwidth history so when
they restart they don't lose their bandwidth capacity estimate. This
release also fixes a diverse set of user-facing bugs, ranging from
relays overrunning their rate limiting to clients falsely warning about
clock skew to bridge
It seems that the tor Doxygen isn't published anywhere? From this
http://www.bitchx.com/log/tor-o/tor-o-25-May-2010/tor-o-25-May-2010-00.php
it looks like it hasn't been kept up to date. Maybe that would be a
good first step? Getting the doxygen up to date and in a publicly
accessible place?
On
This is definitely not my area of expertise for Tor (which is why I
didn't say anything earlier), but when you iniitially raised this
thread my kneejerk reaction was to suggest exactly this. Now we
can wait for Roger or Nick to say why it's not the good idea it seems.
-Paul
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 a
Robert Ransom wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 19:56:26 +
> Orionjur Tor-admin wrote:
>
>> When I run `portupgrade -a` on my server under FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE, I
>> have the next message of thesystem:
>> "---> Upgrading 'tor-devel-0.2.2.22.a' to 'tor-devel-0.2.2.22.a_2'
>> (security/tor-devel)
>>
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 03:27:27 +
Orionjur Tor-admin wrote:
> Very thanks.
> After removing libevent-1.4.14b_2 it installs libevent-2.0.10 when
> running `portupgrade`.
> Does it need to me to downgrade libevent-2.0.10 to libevent-1.4.14b_2
> after upgrading tor-devel?
No. Just reinstall the
Moritz Bartl wrote:
On 10.03.2011 11:27, Jim wrote:
Requiring SSL for Tor searches is all well and good, but it creates a
problem that I haven't found a solution for: creating "bookmarks".
It's a great thing Scroogle uses POST by default. It still accepts GET
for both SSL and non-SSL, at lea
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:38 PM, casey dunham wrote:
> It seems that the tor Doxygen isn't published anywhere? From this
> http://www.bitchx.com/log/tor-o/tor-o-25-May-2010/tor-o-25-May-2010-00.php
>
> it looks like it hasn't been kept up to date. Maybe that would be a
> good first step? Getting t
22 matches
Mail list logo
