[tor-talk] some common ground on the gatereloaded topic

2011-02-22 Thread John Case
Friends, It has occurred to me that while I do believe that slapping the badexit label on nodes like gatereloaded is both bad engineering and an unsustainable administrative model, it's NOT necessarily a loss of function. That is, if I do indeed have a bizarro use case, and can't talk about

[tor-talk] myproxy.dyndns.org instead of IP?

2011-02-22 Thread Wolfgang Schechinger
Dear experts, my question concerns the IP/fingerprint combination to pass to other users in order to reach the relay network: My IP is changed every day by my DSL provider. However, I have a dyndns.org web address. Does it work and does it make sense to pass the myproxy.dyndns.org / fingerp

Re: [tor-talk] myproxy.dyndns.org instead of IP?

2011-02-22 Thread cmeclax-sazri
On Tuesday 22 February 2011 05:32:51 Wolfgang Schechinger wrote: > Dear experts, > > my question concerns the IP/fingerprint combination to pass to other users > in order to reach the relay network: > > My IP is changed every day by my DSL provider. However, I have a dyndns.org > web address. I've

Re: [tor-talk] some common ground on the gatereloaded topic

2011-02-22 Thread Damian Johnson
> That is, if I do indeed have a bizarro use case, and can't talk about it, as > we were arguing about, I can still use the "badexit" labeled nodes as I see > fit, yes ? Or do you drop badexits out of the directory after some amount > of time ? Yes, it just effects the defaults. As a client you c

Re: [tor-talk] Is "gatereloaded" a Bad Exit?

2011-02-22 Thread thecarp
On 02/22/2011 01:52 AM, Scott Bennett wrote: > On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:17:45 -0500 "Aplin, Justin M" > wrote: >> Although I've been keeping out of this argument for the most part, and >> even though I'm leaning towards seeing things Mike's way, I just wanted >> to comment that I've actually

Re: [tor-talk] Is "gatereloaded" a Bad Exit?

2011-02-22 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 3:49 PM, thecarp wrote: > It is even possible that someone might run tor in lieu of encrypted > services, I know I went and made sure that the whole trick of getting > end-to-end encryption by having a node ON the target hosts worked for me. For that you need an exit polic

Re: [tor-talk] some common ground on the gatereloaded topic

2011-02-22 Thread John Case
Hello Damian, On Tue, 22 Feb 2011, Damian Johnson wrote: That is, if I do indeed have a bizarro use case, and can't talk about it, as we were arguing about, I can still use the "badexit" labeled nodes as I see fit, yes ? Or do you drop badexits out of the directory after some amount of time ?