Re: [tor-talk] some common ground on the gatereloaded topic (fwd)

2011-03-05 Thread Damian Johnson
Those relays will accept exit traffic so, if you use a controller to manually build a circuit through them it should work just fine. -Damian On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 10:50 AM, John Case wrote: > > I never saw an explicit answer to the below, which I think would be valuable > for posterity .. list a

Re: [tor-talk] some common ground on the gatereloaded topic (fwd)

2011-03-05 Thread John Case
I never saw an explicit answer to the below, which I think would be valuable for posterity .. list archives, etc. See below: On Tue, 22 Feb 2011, Damian Johnson wrote: That is, if I do indeed have a bizarro use case, and can't talk about it, as we were arguing about, I can still use the "b

Re: [tor-talk] some common ground on the gatereloaded topic

2011-02-22 Thread John Case
Hello Damian, On Tue, 22 Feb 2011, Damian Johnson wrote: That is, if I do indeed have a bizarro use case, and can't talk about it, as we were arguing about, I can still use the "badexit" labeled nodes as I see fit, yes ? Or do you drop badexits out of the directory after some amount of time ?

Re: [tor-talk] some common ground on the gatereloaded topic

2011-02-22 Thread Damian Johnson
> That is, if I do indeed have a bizarro use case, and can't talk about it, as > we were arguing about, I can still use the "badexit" labeled nodes as I see > fit, yes ? Or do you drop badexits out of the directory after some amount > of time ? Yes, it just effects the defaults. As a client you c